man winding
·That is really interesting. I'm curious about how the bracelet on the new Ed White differs from that on the A11 50th. I guess I had assumed they were pretty much the same other than the 19mm v. 20mm.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
That is really interesting. I'm curious about how the bracelet on the new Ed White differs from that on the A11 50th. I guess I had assumed they were pretty much the same other than the 19mm v. 20mm.
Me too. I’ll be able to compare tomorrow afternoon when mine arrives!
It was literally one of those "shut up and take my money" moments. I might have also said something along the lines of "oh and this is so perfect this could be my end game, bye" (which they did not like that much).
Congratulations - I’m sure you’re going to love it when it arrives!
I’ve measured them both to try to work this out and the only difference that I can see is the width, as you pointed out. It just feels even better (speaking as someone who often wears the A11 largely because the bracelet is so good). Being slightly thinner I guess the bracelet is also slightly lighter.
Thanks for this perspective. Would you be able to measure the width of the middle link on both the A11 and the 321?
I’m very interested to know if they are the exact same width, as it would mean endlinks that can fit the A11 could also fit the 321.
so it can be done. Just depends on your OB. I think the case he could have a guaranteed sale, and not have to faff around calling a load of punters that didn’t want may have helped.
Or maybe I just got lucky....
How is the accuracy of it? anybody test this out. just curious.
I somehow missed the release (absolutely no idea how) so called my OB in the summer to get on the list. I was told 12-18 month wait at that time and turned out to be more like 7 or 8.
I know the OB well and had some purchase history at the time but by no means VIP.
I don’t time my watches if I’m honest, but I have this and it’s between 1-2 seconds a day out. Pretty impressive really.
I wonder if they’ve addressed some of the failures on the 321 or if the new ones suffer from broken chronograph bridges and column wheels that shed teeth like the vintage ones did, given they said they copied the original it sounds like there wasn’t a desire to improve upon it really.
Good question. Do you think these problems with the vintage ones were down to the design (which I guess is the same) or tooling/materials (which may have improved)?
I wonder if they’ve addressed some of the failures on the 321 or if the new ones suffer from broken chronograph bridges and column wheels that shed teeth like the vintage ones did, given they said they copied the original it sounds like there wasn’t a desire to improve upon it really.
With the age of the "classic" 321 movements, is it possible over the years they have been serviced by non Omega shops where adjustment, non OEM parts, assembly or torque specifications of screws not being used etc could cause failures? Also while the original outward appearances sizes are copies based on the original I would suspect where applicable modern materials with stronger resistance to fatigue would have been used. I also say this as almost all the vintage 321s I see on the market have scratched up movements and the screws show signs of tooling damage. These have been around since the 60s and for a good portion of that time were not as coveted as they are now so I'm sure many found service at the local mall.
In other news, the local OB mentioned they see a good number more Silver Snoopy models then ss321s coming in.
My money is still on at the prediction, at end of this references life the total count circulating will be inline with a "limited edition" run.
I wonder if they’ve addressed some of the failures on the 321 or if the new ones suffer from broken chronograph bridges and column wheels that shed teeth like the vintage ones did, given they said they copied the original it sounds like there wasn’t a desire to improve upon it really