Availability of 321 even lower than we think it is?

Posts
62
Likes
134
That is really interesting. I'm curious about how the bracelet on the new Ed White differs from that on the A11 50th. I guess I had assumed they were pretty much the same other than the 19mm v. 20mm.
I’ve measured them both to try to work this out and the only difference that I can see is the width, as you pointed out. It just feels even better (speaking as someone who often wears the A11 largely because the bracelet is so good). Being slightly thinner I guess the bracelet is also slightly lighter.
 
Posts
62
Likes
134
Me too. I’ll be able to compare tomorrow afternoon when mine arrives!
Congratulations - I’m sure you’re going to love it when it arrives!
 
Posts
62
Likes
134
It was literally one of those "shut up and take my money" moments. I might have also said something along the lines of "oh and this is so perfect this could be my end game, bye" (which they did not like that much).
Pretty sure that’s exactly what I’d have done in normal circumstances but fortunately I was at home (lockdown here in the UK) so nobody heard everything I must have been saying.

Very glad to hear you’re enjoying yours!
 
Posts
2,889
Likes
11,948
Congratulations - I’m sure you’re going to love it when it arrives!
We shall be able to compare notes tomorrow. I’ll post a photo and some thoughts. 👍
 
Posts
63
Likes
63
I’ve measured them both to try to work this out and the only difference that I can see is the width, as you pointed out. It just feels even better (speaking as someone who often wears the A11 largely because the bracelet is so good). Being slightly thinner I guess the bracelet is also slightly lighter.

Thanks for this perspective. Would you be able to measure the width of the middle link on both the A11 and the 321?

I’m very interested to know if they are the exact same width, as it would mean endlinks that can fit the A11 could also fit the 321.
 
Posts
62
Likes
134
Thanks for this perspective. Would you be able to measure the width of the middle link on both the A11 and the 321?

I’m very interested to know if they are the exact same width, as it would mean endlinks that can fit the A11 could also fit the 321.
I was about to reply but @stevec14 beat me to it, on the other 321 thread. The middle links are the same. Just the outer links are narrower. Sounds like good news?
 
Posts
227
Likes
628
I’d like to hear from people who have received their steel Speedy 321. When did you express interest/put your deposit down for the watch? Do you have a lot of purchase history with the OB/AD? I put my deposit down at the OB the day after the watch was announced. I’ve been contacting the OB every couple of months with the polite response of “We haven’t heard anything from corporate about when we’ll be getting your watch. Hope to have good news soon.”
 
Posts
2,889
Likes
11,948
For me, I’m in the U.K. so no deposit was required. I know the OB quite well and had my name down in July/ august last year. As I was getting twitchy about going grey (they don’t trade trade at a huge premium here) I decided to see how my meteoric rise up the list was going - this was in mid February.

initially, the manager (who is new I think) said he couldn’t find me on the list. I asked if he could check again as had spoken to one of his guys and gave him the date and the sales person via the email I had received.

he apologised and said I had moved up to a decent place, but that he would try and allocate me one as soon as possible. I responded with a thank you. And a cheeky ‘I’m ready to go when you get one in’.

2 weeks later I got a call. I’ve bought 2 watches and about a grands worth of bracelets/straps over the years - so not vip level by any means! I used to work just round the corner however, and used to pop in a couple of times a week, look at the watches and shoot the breeze a bit (not for a year now due to Covid however)

sometimes a gentle prod to work out where you are and to show you are serious can work the oracle. I had a similar experience with a Harrods Tudor a few years ago when I got one after about 2 months.

so it can be done. Just depends on your OB. I think the case he could have a guaranteed sale, and not have to faff around calling a load of punters that didn’t want may have helped.

Or maybe I just got lucky....
 
Posts
3,998
Likes
9,018
so it can be done. Just depends on your OB. I think the case he could have a guaranteed sale, and not have to faff around calling a load of punters that didn’t want may have helped.

Or maybe I just got lucky....

3rd to sign up the day of release at a fairly large OB in the U.S.; placed a full deposit; did everything over the phone

I had no history with this OB, and had only purchased one modern Omega but in a Japan AD (Tokyo 2020); the OB salesperson did ask me to send photos of my Tokyo 2020 receipt, and of my vintage Omega pieces, in order to “better establish my file” -> I was happy to oblige these oddities in that it felt the salesperson was attempting a genuine attempt to determine I was a serious buyer for personal use. Touched bases with the OB every few months.

I ultimately waited 356 days before I got the call.
 
Posts
2,889
Likes
11,948
How is the accuracy of it? anybody test this out. just curious.
I don’t time my watches if I’m honest, but I have this and it’s between 1-2 seconds a day out. Pretty impressive really.
 
Posts
62
Likes
134
I somehow missed the release (absolutely no idea how) so called my OB in the summer to get on the list. I was told 12-18 month wait at that time and turned out to be more like 7 or 8.

I know the OB well and had some purchase history at the time but by no means VIP.
 
Posts
2,889
Likes
11,948
I somehow missed the release (absolutely no idea how) so called my OB in the summer to get on the list. I was told 12-18 month wait at that time and turned out to be more like 7 or 8.

I know the OB well and had some purchase history at the time but by no means VIP.
Pretty much mirrors my experience mate. 👍
 
Posts
62
Likes
134
I don’t time my watches if I’m honest, but I have this and it’s between 1-2 seconds a day out. Pretty impressive really.
Same with mine. Certainly holds its own next to the new Master Chronometer movements!
 
Posts
34,272
Likes
38,892
I wonder if they’ve addressed some of the failures on the 321 or if the new ones suffer from broken chronograph bridges and column wheels that shed teeth like the vintage ones did, given they said they copied the original it sounds like there wasn’t a desire to improve upon it really.

Edited:
 
Posts
62
Likes
134
I wonder if they’ve addressed some of the failures on the 321 or if the new ones suffer from broken chronograph bridges and column wheels that shed teeth like the vintage ones did, given they said they copied the original it sounds like there wasn’t a desire to improve upon it really.

Good question. Do you think these problems with the vintage ones were down to the design (which I guess is the same) or tooling/materials (which may have improved)?
 
Posts
34,272
Likes
38,892
Good question. Do you think these problems with the vintage ones were down to the design (which I guess is the same) or tooling/materials (which may have improved)?
When they went to the 861 they used a much larger and more substantial chronograph bridge, I’ve had one and seen other ones snapped in the sample location approximately and the 861 I’ve not seen any broken examples of posted anywhere though a watchmaker would be better to ask. I’ve not personally had any with broken column wheels but I’ve seen a few of them around both in eBay listings and people asking for help on the forum, they replaced this too with a stronger cam mechanism in the 861.
 
Posts
15
Likes
14
I wonder if they’ve addressed some of the failures on the 321 or if the new ones suffer from broken chronograph bridges and column wheels that shed teeth like the vintage ones did, given they said they copied the original it sounds like there wasn’t a desire to improve upon it really.

With the age of the "classic" 321 movements, is it possible over the years they have been serviced by non Omega shops where adjustment, non OEM parts, assembly or torque specifications of screws not being used etc could cause failures? Also while the original outward appearances sizes are copies based on the original I would suspect where applicable modern materials with stronger resistance to fatigue would have been used. I also say this as almost all the vintage 321s I see on the market have scratched up movements and the screws show signs of tooling damage. These have been around since the 60s and for a good portion of that time were not as coveted as they are now so I'm sure many found service at the local mall.

In other news, the local OB mentioned they see a good number more Silver Snoopy models then ss321s coming in.

My money is still on at the prediction, at end of this references life the total count circulating will be inline with a "limited edition" run.
 
Posts
34,272
Likes
38,892
With the age of the "classic" 321 movements, is it possible over the years they have been serviced by non Omega shops where adjustment, non OEM parts, assembly or torque specifications of screws not being used etc could cause failures? Also while the original outward appearances sizes are copies based on the original I would suspect where applicable modern materials with stronger resistance to fatigue would have been used. I also say this as almost all the vintage 321s I see on the market have scratched up movements and the screws show signs of tooling damage. These have been around since the 60s and for a good portion of that time were not as coveted as they are now so I'm sure many found service at the local mall.

In other news, the local OB mentioned they see a good number more Silver Snoopy models then ss321s coming in.

My money is still on at the prediction, at end of this references life the total count circulating will be inline with a "limited edition" run.
The chronograph bridges snapping, column wheel teeth snapping off, hour sub-register creep etc are the issues I’m referring to, several issues were addressed with the 861 (more robust chronograph bridge and replacing the column wheel) but this appears to be a back to original design 321 again.
 
Posts
7,177
Likes
23,253
I wonder if they’ve addressed some of the failures on the 321 or if the new ones suffer from broken chronograph bridges and column wheels that shed teeth like the vintage ones did, given they said they copied the original it sounds like there wasn’t a desire to improve upon it really

The question I would have is, how frequent a problem are these issues with this caliber? Do watchmakers see this commonly?