- Posts
- 9
- Likes
- 0
Asking your opinion on the dial.
- Posts
- 115
- Likes
- 60
mario linus
·It seems a redial
- Posts
- 1,531
- Likes
- 1,086
François Pépin
·The Omega script looks ok. The minute track seems uneven in crispness, and the Swiss made is weird, but could be because of the angle of the pic. I guess it is original but have indeed been heavily cleaned, which has removed the lume. No lume either on the hands.
- Posts
- 2,520
- Likes
- 17,820
airansun
·Two small observations:
The track in the seconds subdial is not centered.
The 12 is not centered on its hour marker.
The track in the seconds subdial is not centered.
The 12 is not centered on its hour marker.
- Posts
- 105
- Likes
- 212
about3blank
·Agree with @airansun ...except in that I don't think those are "small" observations when it comes to making a purchase decision 🤔
- Posts
- 1,531
- Likes
- 1,086
François Pépin
·Two things look OK to me: the Omega script and the subdial circles. I agree the crest looks off, but could partly be because of the pic, and it is partly things that can be found on dials of that period.
The lines of the subdial are too long compared to what I have seen in such dials. So maybe a redial after all. A partial one?
The lines of the subdial are too long compared to what I have seen in such dials. So maybe a redial after all. A partial one?
- Posts
- 4,963
- Likes
- 18,397
Shabbaz
·My gut feeling was saying redial. Did not like the swiss made...
- Posts
- 1,232
- Likes
- 5,682
Rochete
·I don't like the subdial.
- Posts
- 289
- Likes
- 504
Hamish02
·Interesting observations on the ‘12’ misalignment. I’ve always questioned my Seamaster about the same thing and I’ve also questioned the alignment of ‘omega’ and the logo. These look similar to the OP’s post and might suggest that this is legit and comes with the production of the time like @François Pépin mentioned. I’d suggest it’s the subdial that lets it down for reasons stated previously.
- Posts
- 3,413
- Likes
- 7,319
mac_omega
·dials vary
have you seen all the variations of that era?
have you seen all the variations of that era?
- Posts
- 1,414
- Likes
- 5,334
- Posts
- 289
- Likes
- 504
- Posts
- 9
- Likes
- 0
Rmanz
·Two things look OK to me: the Omega script and the subdial circles. I agree the crest looks off, but could partly be because of the pic, and it is partly things that can be found on dials of that period.
The lines of the subdial are too long compared to what I have seen in such dials. So maybe a redial after all. A partial one?
- Posts
- 1,531
- Likes
- 1,086
François Pépin
·Interesting observations on the ‘12’ misalignment. I’ve always questioned my Seamaster about the same thing and I’ve also questioned the alignment of ‘omega’ and the logo. These look similar to the OP’s post and might suggest that this is legit and comes with the production of the time like @François Pépin mentioned. I’d suggest it’s the subdial that lets it down for reasons stated previously.
To me, it is clear that this dial is original.
- Posts
- 1,531
- Likes
- 1,086
François Pépin
·R RmanzThank you all for your replies. I will stay away from it and wait for the next opportunity.
Maybe because you could ask to the seller a good front pic of the dial. Because to me it is still not clear.
- Posts
- 115
- Likes
- 60
mario linus
·Imho a redial for sure, ugly subdial, strange "swiss made", misalignements at 12 and 6
