arturo7
·That theater is amazing
Sorry, that is NOT "Art Deco". That is "Streamline". Art Deco is that other poster's pocket watch with the enamal and elaborite decoration.
If there is no elaborate decoration, especially nature themes, it is NOT ART DECO.
Ahem.
Very nice and that Patek Philippe watch is a beauty👍
That theater is amazing
Thats correct. Didn't imagine this theater can be that recognizable.
I showed the image to my son who has an interest in historical architecture and city planing which he studied at Berkeley. He recognized the theater which is in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico. The Teatro Yagüez is a neo-baroque theater designed by Francisco Maymón Palmer, and features some eclectic elements that are misconstrued by many as Art Deco. Built in 1909, it was completed well before the style or the term Art Deco existed.
Sorry, that is NOT "Art Deco". That is "Streamline". Art Deco is that other poster's pocket watch with the enamal and elaborite decoration.
If there is no elaborate decoration, especially nature themes, it is NOT ART DECO.
Ahem.
This appears to be art deco, I believe.
Have a look at @Syrte's thread on the "Egyptian" Longines - it has the same awesome numerals.
Hi, just checked out that thread, i can't believe i hadn't seen it yet. Alas, i don't think they are the exact same numerals. I can post a picture of another watch with the same numerals tomorrow. Thank you for the amazing comparison.
If there is no elaborate decoration, especially nature themes, it is NOT ART DECO.
Ahem.
Great info, thank you! Would love to hear anything else you might know about it. I was given very little from the seller, was just drawn to it for the reasons stated above. A few more macro pics of the dial below (I added the funky nato for a bit of cravat flair!)
Here is a Bulova Templan from 1929/1930. Not for the first time, I have to scratch my head, because it seems to combine some Art Deco-ness (dial, case shape) with callbacks to Art Nouveau (hands, scrollwork on case). I suppose a watch in this bracket (retailed for about $37.50 at the time) was intended as a commercial proposition rather than an aesthetic statement. I'm not sure whether to celebrate or deplore the red paint on the numerals, which were originally radium - quite effective, I'd say. Any views?
Disclosure - now, I don't want to fall foul of either the auction or copyright patrols, but this watch is being auctioned this afternoon, and I have made a fair use rip of the seller's photo. I have no connection.