Are watches meant to be worn?

Posts
2,483
Likes
4,633
But it is a funny phrase to use in the context of any sort of collecting. Almost every object has a nominal purpose, but the nature of collecting is generally to possess objects beyond the level of simple utility.

Very true.
 
Posts
2,721
Likes
11,989
I feel like a lot of the “watches are meant to be worn” scorn goes to the investment types who buy watch protector sticker kits and are afraid of scratches on new watches.
 
Posts
2,750
Likes
4,794
I think it puts it more into perspective if we compare watch collecting to coin collecting. You're not going to use those rare and valuable coins in every day trading just to get some satisfaction out of it. Watches or many other collecting hobbies aren't any different.
A good comparison.
 
Posts
121
Likes
207
This debate always comes to one point only. To "worn" is not the same at all for every one. Some have Excel to keep track of their watches' rotation. Some thinks they are the only true watch lovers because they put on a Patek to build a brick wall. On the other side to put a watch once a year at their wedding is stated has "worn".

Infinite debate. No end.
 
Posts
2,750
Likes
4,794
But it is a funny phrase to use in the context of any sort of collecting. Almost every object has a nominal purpose, but the nature of collecting is generally to possess objects beyond the level of simple utility.
Agreed.
 
Posts
5,268
Likes
8,969
Short answer to your question: Yes.

Incl. my MilSub on an old green NATO strap. That Combo has never attracted unwanted attention . And I wear it a lot. So, ...
 
Posts
12,894
Likes
51,575
Not the OP, but other people will often say "watches are meant to be worn" as a way to mock collectors.
I agree Dan. I once got some pretty nasty pushback for referring to OF as a “collectors forum”. Personally, I’m not adding to my collection these days. I’m also not wearing as many as regularly as I used to. I enjoy visiting with some of my dressier pieces though. Frankly, when I think of my collection in utilitarian terms, I quickly realize that’s not the dammed point for me.
 
Posts
146
Likes
506
I personally appreciate those unworn watches because it will allow them to be available later after I scratch and dent mine up and want a shiny new looking version in 10 years 😁
 
Posts
4,912
Likes
17,123
I once got some pretty nasty pushback for referring to OF as a “collectors forum”.

This could be it's own thread.

Even though I don't technically consider myself a watch collector, I agree that the OF is a collector's forum (that is also open to and encouraging of neophytes to participate in and learn.)

I think you are using the word collector not as a person who simply gathers items and catalogs them before storing them in a case, but instead as a person who learns as much as they can about the heritage, production nuances and attempts to procure the finest example possible of each watch.

While I might not consider myself a collector, I share the same passions about heritage and desire for the finest example, etc... For example, looking to buy a "collector's example" of a watch.

What then is the difference? In my mind, a collector has a goal. Some people might think of a collector as anyone who wants to acquire as many watches as possible without discrimination. Other people may think a collector has a refined set of requirements that focuses on a subset.

Here again, I am similar to a collector because I tend to focus on a subset, which are space watches. So why am I not a collector? For me, another element of a collector is being an expert in their field. That's a main reason why the OF is a collector's forum, because it has knowledgeable people. I don't have that same depth of knowledge.

But maybe a person doesn't need to be an expert, but can just have a passing interest. What makes them a collector could be they simply have more than one copy of an item. How many watches does it take. Do three watches make you a collector? What about twelve? Most non-watch wearing people would consider someone with twelve watches a watch collector.

Another element of a collector is that a collection is seldom complete. A collector generally will be missing some elusive example that keeps their collection from being complete. There's a element of needing to continue to add more.

Maybe I am a collector to some, even though that's not how I think of myself. Tensions might rise when we all likely have our own subtle differences on what it means to be a collector.

This is a bit of a rambling, early morning (for me) thought exercise with my coffee. It's a fun thing to discuss with like minded individuals. Maybe we need a group for collectors anonymous.
 
Posts
337
Likes
355
I chipped a piece off my speedy 3750 lug yesterday. I'm still sad about it. Never should have worn the dang thing (I'm kidding, but not totally)
 
Posts
4,544
Likes
11,573
Embrace it @pdxleaf, you're a collector of space watches. From what I have seen on these forums, you have a damn nice collection!
 
Posts
4,912
Likes
17,123
Embrace it @pdxleaf, you're a collector of space watches. From what I have seen on these forums, you have a damn nice collection!

Takes one to know one.