seekingseaquest
·I was in the progress of posting all of my clean-dial “redials” - then I realized I have too many 

N ngintimeOkay, clearly I'm misphrasing this.
Is it possible that someone could have refinished that dial to that high a degree of quality? It seems like the community here either thinks that's impossible or is giving the seller the benefit of the doubt, and I can't tell which it is.
Some people call me naive. I always try to see the best in people. 😁
Saving this reply as I'm glad we're being open. 👍
I was going to post this excerpt of the rules for @Shabbaz
"You can of course openly discuss the item in question publicly , but not in the sales post . Such discussions are to be respectful and non-accusatory. Serious concerns should be directed in reports to staff."
I have also stuck my foot in my mouth over wrongly calling an original dial a redial.
Let’s say the dude isn’t a troll for the sake of argument. I often find myself amazed at the condition of 50-60-70 etc year old watches I see here, and not just in the sales section but in the WRUW. I could see in our cynical age someone used to seeing things that look their age could question many of these examples. Shoot I’ve done more damage to a watch in 5 years than many of these beauties but I’m an idiot and wore a nice movado changing motors. I don’t know why I did it I just always wore that watch. But yes things that look like they were in a sock draw for a lifetime exist, and it’s actually not even that rare. Look at pocket watch collections. I got a friend who has some from the 1800’s that look like they just came off the shelf. It’s good to question things to a degree, but yes, many times things are as they seem. Other times, not so much.