sgrenald
路Google Executive Order 6102 which is a very prominent example.
In 1933 US citizens had to hand in privately held Gold to the Government because too much of the USD was printed and the currency was devaluated. in 1934, the gold standard was created which pegged the USD to Gold creating a backed currency.
Gold Standard was again rejected in 1971 because the government had to issue more USD than they could back with gold reserves. This led to the fiat standard which we still have today. Now look at the health of our current fiat currencies and ask yourself what would be a smart move from the government perspective. yeah, protecting the citizens from bad goods (that actually hold value). lets ban it
The US went OFF the gold standard in 1933, after almost 60 years. And while EO 6102 required people to hand in gold, what that meant in practical terms was to turn in your gold coins at the local bank and get paper money in exchange. The average person wouldn't have had more than a hundred bucks or so in gold at MOST. That would be the equivalent of about $1500 today. It also wasn't enforced in any meaningful way and there were lots of exceptions (e.g. numismatic coins). It's not like the FBI was doing house-to-house searches for gold hoarders. Any gold that was handed back to the banks was sent to the treasury where it was melted down. But today you can buy common date $20 gold double eagles for a little over the spot price of gold, which tells you how much is still out there.
In the 70s, they basically shut down the Bretton Woods system, because too many foreign nations were requesting payments in gold instead of dollars. https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/gold-convertibility-ends
While there are certain benefits to having a gold-backed currency, overall, it creates more problems than it solves in a modern economy.