Community Stories

Aqua Terra 1574/898 bracelet on 41mm Seamaster Diver (success!)

Annapolis
Posts
1,873
Likes
2,851
My 1574/898 arrived today, after a prolonged shipping delay. I was eager to see if this really works---and it does, and I'm quite thrilled with the result, as I love my 41mm ceramic diver, but dislike the non-tapering, chunky-clasp, and IMO way over-ornamented bracelet it came on. I just wanted a standard oyster-style bracelet, and I love the concealed clasps on the ATs.

Fitment is perfect at the lugs---the springbars snap in as they should, and everything looks just right on the back. There's a slight protrusion at the lug-ends (pictured below), but it's only noticeable, really, side-on, and even then it's not enough to bother me. The picture exaggerates the phenomenon, as I'm pulling the bracelet straight out. (Quite frankly, I've owned other brand watches that have such protrusions from the factory.) To me the, the pros far outweigh this one small con.

SO much happier with this combo than the original one! And if I ever change my mind, I'll swap the original back on---it's going in the safe for now.

EDIT: after wearing for an hour, one other observation. This bracelet makes the watch wear significantly lighter, which is a big plus; it does balance a little differently than the original combo, making the watch a little more top-heavy.

IMG_4224.webp IMG_4226.webp IMG_4227.webp
Edited:
 
Meme-Dweller
Posts
2,477
Likes
3,862
Looks good! That style of endlink protrusion basically makes it a white gold Daytona.
 
502 to right
Posts
1,145
Likes
1,193
This is my favorite bracelet for my 41mm SMP's. In fact, I'm writing this with this bracelet on my 2531.80. The minor protrusion is something I noticed as well. And within 5 minutes I never thought about it again (until I read threads like this). It is 100% not an issue in real life.

If you want to continue down the rabbit hole of style and comfort, you can add a Heritage 300 adjustable clasp to the bracelet.


IMG_8684.webp
 
502 to right
Posts
1,145
Likes
1,193
Did you need to use 1.5mm springbars? With my 2541.80 and 2531.80 I can use 1.8mm springbars. But for my 2220.80 I need to use 1.5mm springbars.

Here is my 2220.80 with the AT bracelet.

IMG_8688.webp
 
Annapolis
Posts
1,873
Likes
2,851
I just used whatever spring bars were on the factory bracelet as the 1574 I bought didn’t come with any, so I’m not sure.

Love that clasp, but for now prefer having the concealed one. Not “dive watchy,” but that doesn’t bother me at all.
 
502 to right
Posts
1,145
Likes
1,193
Annapolis Annapolis
I just used whatever spring bars were on the factory bracelet as the 1574 I bought didn’t come with any, so I’m not sure.

Love that clasp, but for now prefer having the concealed one. Not “dive watchy,” but that doesn’t bother me at all.
If you don't mind the lack of micro-adjustment it's a nice stealthy clasp.
 
Annapolis
Posts
1,873
Likes
2,851
Micro is always nice but I don’t miss it—the original dive clasp didn’t have it, and if it’s between that and thinness, I choose the latter every time.
 
502 to right
Posts
1,145
Likes
1,193
Annapolis Annapolis
Micro is always nice but I don’t miss it—the original dive clasp didn’t have it, and if it’s between that and thinness, I choose the latter every time.
I'm the opposite. I'll take thick + micro-adjustment vs. thin + no micro-adjustment. But the best is thin + micro adjustment, which is pretty much what the Heritage 300 clasp provides.
 
hen
Posts
3,074
Likes
9,138
That sure looks good, I would not mind the protrusion. No protrusion on the original Speedy bracelet either, but I dont know if it fits the ceramic
IMG_20230525_144645 (2).webp
.
 
502 to right
Posts
1,145
Likes
1,193
hen hen
That sure looks good, I would not mind the protrusion. No protrusion on the original Speedy bracelet either, but I dont know if it fits the ceramic
IMG_20230525_144645 (2).webp
.

It will fit the no wave ceramics of the mid-2010's. But not the current 42mm version. I also have this bracelet. My complaint is that the mid-links on the end links stick out too far. The AT bracelet end link mid-link has more curve down toward your arm. But if someone has a large wrist they probably wouldn't notice.
 
R
Posts
7
Likes
1
@502 to right --- good morning I hope this finds you well. I am in the process of also replacing the bracelet on my seamaster 41mm. However I noticed that @Annapolis used the 1574/898 AT bracelet and when I see the photo of your seamaster the bracelet has a different clasp than the 1574/898. Your clasp is diver style while the 1574/898 is a more dressier clasp. Would you mind sharing the bracelet model and serial number you have on your seamaster? I am struggling to find a 1574/898 in a good condition at a reasonable price so I want to make sure I consider all other possible OEM Omega bracelets that fits the 41mm. Any help you can provide will be greatly appreciated.
 
texasmade
Posts
2,656
Likes
2,977
R RalphB
@502 to right --- good morning I hope this finds you well. I am in the process of also replacing the bracelet on my seamaster 41mm. However I noticed that @Annapolis used the 1574/898 AT bracelet and when I see the photo of your seamaster the bracelet has a different clasp than the 1574/898. Your clasp is diver style while the 1574/898 is a more dressier clasp. Would you mind sharing the bracelet model and serial number you have on your seamaster? I am struggling to find a 1574/898 in a good condition at a reasonable price so I want to make sure I consider all other possible OEM Omega bracelets that fits the 41mm. Any help you can provide will be greatly appreciated.
I think he replaced the standard clasp on the 1574/898 with a different clasp. Here's a picture of my 1574/898 on my Seamaster. Bracelet should look like this.
https://omegaforums.net/threads/2254-bracelet-options.104108/ Speedy2254
Thread '2254 bracelet options' ·
My newly serviced 2254 is back in action but I have been wearing a DJ 41 in the meantime & the 20 to 16 mm taper of the Oyster bracelet makes the Speedy type bracelet of the 2254 look a bit...
Speedy2254 ·
 
R
Posts
7
Likes
1
texasmade texasmade
I think he replaced the standard clasp on the 1574/898 with a different clasp. Here's a picture of my 1574/898 on my Seamaster. Bracelet should look like this.
https://omegaforums.net/threads/2254-bracelet-options.104108/ Speedy2254
Thread '2254 bracelet options' ·
My newly serviced 2254 is back in action but I have been wearing a DJ 41 in the meantime & the 20 to 16 mm taper of the Oyster bracelet makes the Speedy type bracelet of the 2254 look a bit...
Speedy2254 ·
@texasmade - thanks for sharing, looks really nice, that is exactly what my goal is.
 
502 to right
Posts
1,145
Likes
1,193
R RalphB
@502 to right --- good morning I hope this finds you well. I am in the process of also replacing the bracelet on my seamaster 41mm. However I noticed that @Annapolis used the 1574/898 AT bracelet and when I see the photo of your seamaster the bracelet has a different clasp than the 1574/898. Your clasp is diver style while the 1574/898 is a more dressier clasp. Would you mind sharing the bracelet model and serial number you have on your seamaster? I am struggling to find a 1574/898 in a good condition at a reasonable price so I want to make sure I consider all other possible OEM Omega bracelets that fits the 41mm. Any help you can provide will be greatly appreciated.

See post #66 in the attached thread. The parts are the same for the 1574/898.

https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/adjustable-clasp-conversion-compilation.5396509/#replies
 
R
Posts
7
Likes
1
R RalphB
thank you so much
@502 to right --- good morning and sorry to bother you again. I read all the comments on the link you provided and see the 3 clasp options. However, since the 1574 898 tappers at approximately 17mm I could not conclude which clasp model number is the one you have. I really like how your 1574 898 bracelet looks with that clasp from looking at your photo. If you don't mind and when you have time can you please let me know the clasp model number?
 
R
Posts
7
Likes
1
I think I found it... please let me know if I am on the right track

Bracelet for 1st Gen 39mm Aqua Terra 1574/898 - Part No. 020ST1574898
Links to connect bracelet to clasp - Part No. 118ST1589 (you need 2)
Clasp for 2021 Omega 300 Heritage - Part No. 117STZ014058
 
502 to right
Posts
1,145
Likes
1,193
R RalphB
I think I found it... please let me know if I am on the right track

Bracelet for 1st Gen 39mm Aqua Terra 1574/898 - Part No. 020ST1574898
Links to connect bracelet to clasp - Part No. 118ST1589 (you need 2)
Clasp for 2021 Omega 300 Heritage - Part No. 117STZ014058
Correct
 
Sign up or log in to reply...

Similar threads

A

End Link Compatibility: 1574/898 Bracelet with 897 or 899 End Links?

Ahnkangsoo Modern Omega Watches
502 to right
502 to right
Posts
3
Views
607
Meme-Dweller

New 20mm OMEGA 1503/825 SMP Bond for 1120 1538 41mm Seamaster Professional Stainless Steel Bracelet

Meme-Dweller Watch Parts and Accessories For Sale
Meme-Dweller
Meme-Dweller
Posts
0
Views
4K
R

Uncle Seiko Omega bracelet on 41mm 8900 Aqua Terra?

Rice & Gravy Modern Omega Watches
Nactex
Nactex
Posts
5
Views
6K
stamsd

1171 Bracelet on a Modern 41mm Seamaster- Help Needed

stamsd Modern Omega Watches
oddboy
oddboy
Posts
4
Views
1K