McKnife
·Nobody actually ever said a thing about that around me.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
That's definitely an option. I wear a SMP on my left wrist and a Garmin Instinct 2 Solar on my right. Why not? A watch I love to look at on the left, one with all the great health tracking functions on the right.
Nobody actually ever said a thing about that around me.
I have heard of an option named „Whoop“ that does not have a display but tracks everything. As it is technically not a watch it might be suitable to keep wearing a nice watch. However, I am not aware of the details.
... I’m not a fan of Fitbit quality. All the Fitbits I’ve had crap out after like a year. But maybe Garmin or others. After trying the Fitbit thing a couple times nothing quite does it like a good old fashioned mechanical wristwatch.
I was just about to mention Whoop since it has no watch face and comes in neutral colors. It does all the usual fitness and sleep tracking, but could be worn on the opposite wrist without looking like as much of a weirdo.
Agreed, Fitbit stuff is junk and so is their software. Very annoying to use.

G-Shock or a Seiko diver are my go two pieces for the gym.
Perhaps you could elaborate on why you're considering an Apple Watch. Are you simply looking for something to track your gym workouts? And, if so, by gym workouts do you mean resistance training? More to the point, do you participate in any endurance training (running, cycling, swimming)? Are you looking for a watch that can provide a more holistic view of your health?
I've been an Apple Watch wearer since the original "Series 0" release and I love it. And I also love traditional watches (both mechanical and quartz). If it helps, here are some of my observations. I would be happy to elaborate if there are questions.
- No smart watch does that great a job of tracking resistance training. You're probably better off using a phone and an good set tracking app.
- For endurance training, the Apple Watch is as good as the best Garmins, and better in many ways that all the others (Polar, Suunto, Coros). (And yes, I have used all of the above.)
- For general health and fitness, nothing beats the Apple Watch.
- For general smart watch functionality and convenience - provided you're in the Apple eco-system (e.g. iPhone, Apple Music not Spotify, HomeKit, ...) - it's not even close. Apple Watch can be a game changer.
As to whether the Apple Watch replaces your traditional watch, that's really up to you. It hasn't for me simply because I love my traditional watches. My current routine:
- I work from home. During the day I'm almost always wearing a traditional watch. It's a nice spark to glance at my wrist and take a moment to admire the art and engineering that went into whatever is there. (Currently it's a 1950s Delbana Chronograph.)
- My Apple Watch Ultra tracks all my workouts. (I do race ultra-marathons and Ironman triathlons, so I have no problem justifying the Ultra over a standard Apple Watch.)
- I wear an older Apple Watch overnight as that tracks quite a bit of useful health data (resting heart rate, heart rate variability, sleep duration, repiratory rate, temperature).
- When traveling (which is not common for me), the Apple Watch is the only watch that travels with me. The convenience factor is way too great to pass up, and I don't have to worry about anything happening to a watch that would be much harder to replace.
- When running errands, it depends. If I'm taking my phone with me, I'll generally wear a traditional watch. But if I want to leave my phone at home, then it's usually the Apple Watch.
Maybe I should get one [...] or is it too dangerous hahaha
Look at it this way: If you end up wearing the Apple Watch full-time, that means you've found something you like even more than traditional wateches. There's nothing wrong with that.