Often I see a watch and think it’s attractive, and then I see a picture of the back and it has a viewing window and suddenly I don’t like it anymore. For me there’s something crude about it. It’s too revealing. Like a mankini. I love the mechanics of watches, but somehow they should be left alone to get on with their job in privacy. A watch movement is not a creature in a zoo, there to be gawped at. I don’t want to look at the movement working. I know it’s working because the watch is telling me the time. I don’t need the manufacturer to prove to me I have a mechanical watch by allowing me to see it being all mechanical. It’s the same with those dreadful cars where half the bonnet (hood) is removed so you can see the rubber and chromium plated pipes. Put them away. Nobody’s interested in your flashy, noisy, gas guzzler. The first time I saw a Railmaster Co-axial with a display back I was so disappointed. I thought Omega had more class than to do that. Know what I mean?
Same- can’t stand them. It will turn me off of a watch quickly. There have been watches I have shopped that had a display back “upgrade” during the run and I have hunted down the older model specifically because it had a solid back.
Depends on the watch. I don’t care for them on tool or sports watches, but the movement on my JLC Master Ultra Thin Moon with its pink gold “JL” rotor is a work of art.
Given how good replicas are becoming, especially regarding the movement... I doubt it will be easy to tell anymore. I do not mind a display back if the watch comes like this from the factory. Most of the time it is not really interesting, hopefully, it is not visible when wearing it. Skeleton watches on the other hand... Now that is usually ugly. "upgraded" is a no go too. People are asking more money for it while it is something I do not want.
Nope, don't know what you mean and I couldn't disagree more. I love the display to the movement. Saying Omega lacks class because they put a display back on a watch is really a stretch. Seriously, what does class have to do with it?
I've got a couple because that is the only way that particular watch came. I never sit there looking at the movement. My first Omega (a PO) has a display back, and when I bought it I thought is was kind of cool, but that only lasted a day or so. I grab a watch, wind it (for the manuals) and strap it on without pausing to admire the movement.
Not really a fan of display backs, although I do have a few watches, three, that display the movement. Maybe if you don't have a second hand and aren't willing to wait a minute or two to find out if your timepiece is working... not a bad idea. Of the three I own, one has an alternative solid case back. Not a fan, but not a hater.
Only plain movements like Rolex. Most of others, not so much as it takes as much effort and cost to produce them that people might as well buy the original.
Not really since the watch is usually on your wrist and you're not forced to look at the movement. Of course, it also depends what movement is inside.
I have a few display backs. One thing I noticed is people who aren’t into watches seem to appreciate them quite a bit. I have a seiko I got on an amazon sale for 65 us. It’s nothing special but on a few occasions it caught a few peoples eyes and they asked me about it. Being that’s it’s inexpensive I don’t mind handing it over if they want to take a look. They are always amazed at seeing the movement. I tell them the little I know about it’s function. anyway it’s certainly not necessary and who wants to hand around an expensive watch but they certainly can be cool
Seems to me that if you're collecting watches, the movement is part of why, including aesthetic details like finishing. It's not unreasonable to take some pleasure and involvement in that by actually seeing the mechanism you value. Saying a display case isn't worthwhile because it doesn't have functional value is the slippery slope to cheap quartz watches being the "best", and nobody wants that. I have a few display backs but don't care that much about them. But I also wouldn't spend more for a watch with a beautifully finished movement without a window to admire it through .
Imagine being a young or new collector. Imagine buying a seiko 5 after saving up for it and being so excited to see the mechanical parts with the see through case back. You watch the balance wheel and rotor turn and it just looks so cool to you. Then some asshole comes by and tells you, "that's a shit movement, what a shame to display it" I really am disappointed in people more and more every day. Just because a Lange movement is gorgeous and a joy to look at for people with the means to see it, doesn't mean that someone else can't enjoy looking at their entry level watch movement. Gatekeeping at its worst. The reason to like or dislike a see through caseback can be design related, functionality loss, etc. To say that a watch with a simple movement which is targeted towards a person who is buying a watch at a lower price point shouldn't have its movement displayed because it's not a "luxury item" is asinine.
I like both types of watches, but doesn’t the solid metal cover under the caseback of a Speedy provide some of the extra antimagnetic protection of the watch? Has NASA ever certified a clear display caseback watch for space missions? Few of us will travel in space, but thought I’d ask the question.