Any T17 Omega's out there?

Posts
413
Likes
4,423
Good point . A CK3635 Marine Standard in from my point of view good condition. Running accurate.

I like the dial, and yes, I think so too it is a radial because of the sunburst finish, but well done

Because of the Serial 91xxx it should be from the early 40s
 
Posts
1
Likes
5
Great watches in the thread so far! I’d like to share my recent acquisition, a CK976 T17 tank, since I didn’t yet see one in the thread. I just love the boxy case design combined with the delicate art deco dial and bright blue hands. The case seems to be unpolished and the dial is very clean for its age.

Edited:
 
Posts
143
Likes
225
Another one. This time with a painted black sector dial and a tonneau case. Was it a womens watch? Lug width is 12mm...
 
Posts
1,314
Likes
3,647
Another one. This time with a painted black sector dial and a tonneau case. Was it a womens watch? Lug width is 12mm...
T17 were definitely men’s watches. But with a 12mm lug width, are you sure it is a T17?
Very nice watch!
 
Posts
143
Likes
225
T17 were definitely men’s watches. But with a 12mm lug width, are you sure it is a T17?
Very nice watch!
Good question.
I opened it up and it is indeed a t17.
I think the case could not be any smaller for this calibre
 
Posts
2,409
Likes
3,846
*sigh* eventually I should go down the rabbit hole and see if I can find replacements for the missing T17 parts.
 
Posts
1,314
Likes
3,647
Good question.
I opened it up and it is indeed a t17.
I think the case could not be any smaller for this calibre
It doesn’t look like a 12mm lug width. Is 12mm the size at lugs or at buckle side of the strap?
 
Posts
143
Likes
225
*sigh* eventually I should go down the rabbit hole and see if I can find replacements for the missing T17 parts.
What parts do you need? I have movement for parts.
 
Posts
143
Likes
225
It doesn’t look like a 12mm lug width. Is 12mm the size at lugs or at buckle side of the strap?
I am pretty sure it is 12mm in between the lugs.
 
Posts
237
Likes
742
Aquired recently, but didn't find the exact Ref# of this watch, any suggestion from experts?
 
Posts
5,334
Likes
9,070
Your number is inside the case back. There is no "reference" . That's all there is.
 
Posts
1,314
Likes
3,647
Aquired recently, but didn't find the exact Ref# of this watch, any suggestion from experts?
Superb watch and in an amazing condition. Congratulations!
My best guess is ref CK3628, here in a 1940 catalog (ref OJ for the gold version, but it existed also in staybrite steel - ref ck) :
23120502032419182118313812.jpg


Mine says hello :
23120502032519182118313813.jpg
 
Posts
237
Likes
742
Superb watch and in an amazing condition. Congratulations!
My best guess is ref CK3628, here in a 1940 catalog (ref OJ for the gold version, but it existed also in staybrite steel - ref ck) :
23120502032419182118313812.jpg


Mine says hello :
23120502032519182118313813.jpg

Thanks for the great information, and your watch is gorgeous!