Annapolis
·Hi again,
After posting the earlier thread (thank you!) I was contacted by a fellow OFer with a different-lug-style cal 89 that appears to be in very good shape and original to my eyes, but I'd love to have input from the hivemind here. He sent an abundance of pictures--I'm only posting a fraction--and I'm wondering if anyone has feedback or opinions about originality and condition.
The one meaningful photo category missing here is an inside-caseback shot: he explained that he cannot open the watch himself to obtain that. (Presumably, the movement shot was taken at last service.)
To my eyes, the dial text appears to align with the "1954 till at least 1960 all signed 'Swiss'" text that @NT931 posted in the earlier thread.
The watch about $500 less than the other one--2600 USD.
And in the interest of etiquette, I should explain: he knows I'm posting this. And this is not a surrogate sales post: I will not share his username here or in PM. (If he wants to reply, of course, that's up to him.)
After posting the earlier thread (thank you!) I was contacted by a fellow OFer with a different-lug-style cal 89 that appears to be in very good shape and original to my eyes, but I'd love to have input from the hivemind here. He sent an abundance of pictures--I'm only posting a fraction--and I'm wondering if anyone has feedback or opinions about originality and condition.
The one meaningful photo category missing here is an inside-caseback shot: he explained that he cannot open the watch himself to obtain that. (Presumably, the movement shot was taken at last service.)
To my eyes, the dial text appears to align with the "1954 till at least 1960 all signed 'Swiss'" text that @NT931 posted in the earlier thread.
The watch about $500 less than the other one--2600 USD.
And in the interest of etiquette, I should explain: he knows I'm posting this. And this is not a surrogate sales post: I will not share his username here or in PM. (If he wants to reply, of course, that's up to him.)