I was just about to post "I think you posted the wrong pic that one is a cal 505 15,1xx" the one you just posted is a dogleg though - not a 14393 a cal 561 with a 19,6xx would put it around '62/'63 so could well fit into that transitional phase where arrow head dials were still around
Now that’s an early 14381. Note the dial has the full text. So question is if @1jansen ,s last one started life as a dogleg that has the wrong case back ? Anyone else got a late arrowhead dial?
You are a lucky man! A stunning stainless steel 14381-1 with arrowhead, aged original lume. In deed, special lume embossed in the arrowheads. Awesome!! Thanks for sharing.
Hello there, Mine is a 14393 -61 SC for cal 561 (not for 551). The caseback is surely correct for the arrowhead dial. If you are looking for a later version, I have another one. Ref. 14902/3 SC 62 in 18K YG Cal.561 Serial no.19,6xx,xxx with arrowheads as below. I would suppose this is the one mentioned by Desmond in reply to TexOmega re an uncommon version in arrowhead. Your views are welcome.
now that is interesting the serial and 'complete text' puts it around '62/'63 - so pretty late for an arrowhead dial nice watch -congratulations
what I meant was that the case is a dogleg (14902 / 168.005) but the case back is for a 14393 as arrowhead dials could be in either 14902 or 14393 - either could be correct (but not both together )
Please pardon me cuz English is not my mother tongue. So, the 2nd gold-capped Constellation is with matching case of 14393. Everything should be original. Thank you for the information.
I think you have my meaning the case back is wrong for the case but the dial could have originally started off with either (on the assumption that the case was a 14902 not a 168.005)
Congratulations nicolsson! Did you have the caeback opened? Is the ref 2852? Any pic of caseback & movement ? Thanks in advance.
[QUOTE="Peemacgee, post: 836810, member: 12739"[/QUOTE] I think a 14381 or 14393 with arrow head was posted recently -and that was considered uncommon. [/QUOTE] Just saw this thread. Here are my SS 14393 and 14381 with arrowhead markers, without the "Officially Certified" text. Both have serial nos. in the 18,xxx,xxx range. Didn't know they were considered uncommon. I had thought that it was more uncommon to see arrowhead Connies with date, i.e with the Cal 561...
@1jansen I try to open tomorrow...and after I will post here @Martinibianco I’m a new omega enthusiast but... with a lot time to explore this new world and I can assure you I NEVER saw an arrowhead data Connie out there!