Forums Latest Members
  1. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Nov 15, 2017

    Posts
    5,127
    Likes
    7,835

    I was just about to post

    "I think you posted the wrong pic
    that one is a cal 505 15,1xx"

    the one you just posted is a dogleg though - not a 14393

    a cal 561 with a 19,6xx would put it around '62/'63 so could well fit into that transitional phase where arrow head dials were still around
     
    1jansen likes this.
  2. Noddyman Nov 15, 2017

    Posts
    1,116
    Likes
    1,771
    Glad you know what’s going on I am totally confused:)
     
    Peemacgee likes this.
  3. TexOmega Nov 15, 2017

    Posts
    7,265
    Likes
    54,178
    the formatting is not just right
     
  4. TexOmega Nov 15, 2017

    Posts
    7,265
    Likes
    54,178
    14381-1
    Serial 17,000,xxx

    Constellation.JPG DSC07722.JPG Screw Back.JPG


    DSC07725.JPG

    DSC07733.JPG
     
  5. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Nov 15, 2017

    Posts
    5,127
    Likes
    7,835
    :thumbsup:
    Now that’s an early 14381.
    Note the dial has the full text.
    So question is if @1jansen ,s last one started life as a dogleg that has the wrong case back ?

    Anyone else got a late arrowhead dial?
     
  6. noelekal Home For Wayward Watches Nov 15, 2017

    Posts
    5,472
    Likes
    38,142

    Sorry.

    Didn't see this query earlier.

    2852
     
  7. TexOmega Nov 15, 2017

    Posts
    7,265
    Likes
    54,178
    Desmond's comments to me:

    8B4311AC-2241-497D-A94F-F78F6310D775.jpeg

    EE3C16E7-3CAD-46F9-82E1-6EBEC37DF5E3.jpeg


    And the dial feet had not been cut off, and were in the correct locations.

    IMG_2662.JPG
     
    Edited Nov 15, 2017
    Peemacgee likes this.
  8. 1jansen Nov 16, 2017

    Posts
    324
    Likes
    633
  9. 1jansen Nov 16, 2017

    Posts
    324
    Likes
    633
    Hello there,
    Mine is a 14393 -61 SC for cal 561 (not for 551). The caseback is surely correct for the arrowhead dial.

    If you are looking for a later version, I have another one. Ref. 14902/3 SC 62 in 18K YG Cal.561 Serial no.19,6xx,xxx with arrowheads as below.
    I would suppose this is the one mentioned by Desmond in reply to TexOmega re an uncommon version in arrowhead. Your views are welcome.

    20160727_123547_A.jpg 20160727_123823_D.jpg
     
    TexOmega and Peemacgee like this.
  10. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Nov 16, 2017

    Posts
    5,127
    Likes
    7,835
    now that is interesting
    the serial and 'complete text' puts it around '62/'63 - so pretty late for an arrowhead dial
    nice watch -congratulations
     
    TexOmega likes this.
  11. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Nov 16, 2017

    Posts
    5,127
    Likes
    7,835
    what I meant was that the case is a dogleg (14902 / 168.005)
    but the case back is for a 14393
    as arrowhead dials could be in either 14902 or 14393 - either could be correct
    (but not both together ;))
     
  12. 1jansen Nov 16, 2017

    Posts
    324
    Likes
    633
    Please pardon me cuz English is not my mother tongue.
    So, the 2nd gold-capped Constellation is with matching case of 14393. Everything should be original.
    Thank you for the information.
     
  13. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Nov 16, 2017

    Posts
    5,127
    Likes
    7,835
    I think you have my meaning
    the case back is wrong for the case
    but the dial could have originally started off with either (on the assumption that the case was a 14902 not a 168.005)
     
    1jansen likes this.
  14. nicolsson Nov 29, 2017

    Posts
    253
    Likes
    198
    Fished And Just landed
     
    20171129_140446.jpg
    Edited Nov 29, 2017
  15. nicolsson Nov 29, 2017

    Posts
    253
    Likes
    198
    Thanks to all the forum's friends
     
  16. 1jansen Nov 29, 2017

    Posts
    324
    Likes
    633
    Congratulations nicolsson!
    Did you have the caeback opened? Is the ref 2852? Any pic of caseback & movement ?
    Thanks in advance.
     
  17. Martinibianco Nov 29, 2017

    Posts
    186
    Likes
    1,118
    [QUOTE="Peemacgee, post: 836810, member: 12739"[/QUOTE]

    I think a 14381 or 14393 with arrow head was posted recently -and that was considered uncommon.
    [/QUOTE]
    Just saw this thread. Here are my SS 14393 and 14381 with arrowhead markers, without the "Officially Certified" text. Both have serial nos. in the 18,xxx,xxx range. Didn't know they were considered uncommon. I had thought that it was more uncommon to see arrowhead Connies with date, i.e with the Cal 561...
     
    Constellations arrowhead 14393 & 14381.jpg
  18. nicolsson Nov 30, 2017

    Posts
    253
    Likes
    198
    @1jansen I try to open tomorrow...and after I will post here
    @Martinibianco I’m a new omega enthusiast but... with a lot time to explore this new world and I can assure you I NEVER saw an arrowhead data Connie out there!
     
    1jansen likes this.