An ownership review of the Omega Globemaster, or “The Idiot Button”

Longbow

Welcome to the Globemaster Club and to OmegaForums!
I’m not sure what the full Omega part numbers are for the dark blue strap and stainless steel deployant clasp, but these are the numbers that I found on those two parts respectively:-

Longbow

Since no one has put up a long(ish)-term ownership review of the Globemaster yet I thought I would have a go. It’s based on another post on OF in which I tried to highlight the main pros and cons of the GM with some additions here and there to fill a few gaps.

I won’t bore you with the story of its acquisition, nor the crazy antics that I have got up to with my GM (well perhaps one or two); rather I wanted to pull together some of the main observations, likes, dislikes and emotions that this watch have provoked. So, here are my thoughts on the Blue dial Omega Globemaster after (approximately) 18 month ownership.

Maybe I should start by saying a few words about size, weight and other dimensional stuff.

Considering a case diameter of 39mm, you would be forgiven for thinking that the Globemaster is a rather modest sized watch compared to Omega’s other offerings, but the dial represents a large part of that dimension (circa 30/31mm) with a feeling of a lot of open space between the inner tips of the hour markers, i.e. it looks bigger than it really is. From lug to lug it’s 46mm which is actually less than my latest acquisition, the ’57 LE Railmaster (48mm) although you wouldn’t believe it by just glancing at the two side-by-side.

The GM is not a lightweight. With a sapphire crystal and sapphire display back mounted on a steel bracelet you are looking at a max. weight of 162g; the watch head contributing 71g of that mass.

The mathematicians and accounts amongst you will have already figured out that the bracelet is a thumping 91g, which isn’t that surprising when you know that each removable link in the bracelet is at least 2g or more. Speaking of which, these things are worth a closer inspection.

They are not your ordinary oval, symmetrical affairs; almost every surface has a complex compound curve, they are truly miniature works of art, much like the rest of the watch. Everywhere you look on the GM there are subtle design features for you to discover and keep you fascinated in the months and years to come.

So, back to weight, the GM is heavy. If you are not a fan of heavier watches then the GM on steel is probably not for you. Perhaps you should be thinking about the OEM leather strap and deployant buckle combo…

….or looking more towards vintage Constellations, the one shown above far left comes in on the bracelet at a flyweight 80g!

A case thickness of 13mm is, in my opinion rather; well, thick, for any watch. I would have liked it to have been a little slimmer so that it would fit more easily under shirt cuffs with cuff-links.

It does fit but it’s tight.

Is the Globemaster a dress watch or a sports watch? It’s a question that seems to crop up quite often and I’m not sure that you can give a cut and dried answer. I think it does most things well but it works a little better with the more casual look; jeans and a polo shirt perhaps. It is a watch that encourages you to chill out, dump the suit and tie and go get a cool beer at the beach bar or hang out at the night club.

You might want to swap the leather strap for the bracelet before you go to the beach though.

On the subject of bracelets I must confess that I made the classic Noob mistake of buying my Globemaster on the leather strap first and later adding the stainless steel bracelet. This is an expensive way to acquire any watch. In my defence, I didn’t find the bracelet very comfortable initially. The strap by contrast was surprisingly comfy; better than any other I have tried. But I digress, so back to that steel bracelet.

If you put a GM with Steel bracelet on your wrist (where else?) and run your fingers over the watch head and bracelet you will have a smooth refined experience. The upper, outer edges of the bracelet and watch head are chamfered and polished. The bracelet is a precision piece of work with minimal gaps and tight tolerances; it’s a delight to look at and the feel matches the looks.

The only gap of note is where the bracelet meets the end links.

However, that high quality chamfered bracelet edge is not the one next to your skin. The lower edge of the bracelet is simple and sharp. It seemed to me to be razor sharp.

Why does Omega do this? It’s exactly the same issue on my new LE Railmaster, but it’s especially frustrating on the Globemaster because there is a chamfered polished edge on the underside of the watch head that suggests this feature could have been carried through into the bracelet, just like it has been done on the upper side, from watch head to bracelet.

Anyway, I finally got round to buying the bracelet and had those sharp edges knocked off with an almost imperceptibly small but beneficial extra radius added to the outer links.

Now the bracelet is super comfortable. Omega please note, I want to wear my watches on my wrist, not shave with them, so please dump the razor edge finish on future bracelets.

Remember the dress vs casual question? One point to note; if you have a habit of doing dumb-ass shit like me, such as putting your GM on a rock next to waves washing over a sandy beach …

…you are going to get lots of little sand corns in between those precision bracelet centre links, which will cause it to lock up in the most strange (unwearable) form. Still, easy enough to fix with 100m water resistance; just dunk it under the water, slosh it around a bit and leave it to dry off.

The “butterfly” clasp on the GM bracelet was the first that I had ever tried on an Omega, the others being sliding and/or fold-over types.

It seemed pretty fiddly initially but soon became second nature to operate. The quality of construction and finish is first class. I can remember thinking a month or so ago (while trying on the latest Rolex Sub) that the way it snapped shut was somehow more satisfying than on the Glidelock…which is already excellent. It’s also fairly low profile, well-formed and rather inconspicuous compared to other clasps, e.g. the latest ’57 Railmaster extension clasp.

The clasp can also act as a protector for the pretty caseback medallion

Since I thought the OEM Strap was so good I probably ought to say a few words on that topic. I don’t know if my particular model was a well-worn, broken in shop window display model or not but the strap was orders of magnitude better than any other new leather watch strap that I have tried. I can clearly recall my prevaricating and procrastination when asked if I wanted to buy the GM on its steel bracelet…

..but as soon as Peter (the sales guy in the OB) swapped it onto its leather strap I was hooked and I mean INSTANTLY!

In matters comfort and ease of use the strap plus deployant was everything that the bracelet wasn’t: lightweight, supple, comfortable, and easy to operate. So here’s a tip for you: OBs don’t like giving direct discounts (who does?), but they are a little more flexible when it comes to additional stuff purchased at the same time. So if you are going to by a regular Globemaster, buy it on the steel bracelet and haggle over additional strap(s) and deployant clasp.

Something to note about the OEM Omega leather deployant strap is that it is shaped to fit the watch head…

..and is not capable of being folded flat at the spring bar. If you try to do this you will just end up creasing the top of the strap as you can see in the next image.

So it is not ideal if you like to store your watches in those flat pouches.

Concerning colour there is something you should be aware of. The blue dial GM’s OEM strap looks black until you hit it with strong flash and see that it is in fact blue.

Under normal (read office) lighting conditions it mostly looks black but it will probably appear dark blue under natural sunlight. If you are one of those guys that likes to keep watch strap, belt and shoes reasonably colour matched then blue will eventually become a nuisance and you will consider swapping to some other colour…which is when the fun starts with the deployant, but I will come to that later.

If you trawl around OF for some of my earlier posts you will see that I have tried almost every conceivable strap and bracelet combination on my Globemaster. It’s been on the OEM blue leather strap, a light brown (non-Omega) one…

..a dark brown Omega one…

… the proper Omega deployant and a cheapy aftermarket depolyant (which was crap by the way).

Omega OEM strap changing is not per se particularly difficult, as their straps have handy cut-outs which ease spring bar tool access at the watch head. The same cannot be said for the strap end that fits into the deployant clasp. It’s a tight fit and I mean really tight fit between the strap and clasp, which of course looks great but is an absolute sod if you want to swap straps but only have one clasp. This is the moment when you turn the clasp over to see if there is an alternative way to improve spring bar access. It is also the point at which you discover ….THE IDIOT BUTTON.

That’s it, right there above the “E” of “Omega”.

There ought to be a hazard warning sign here instead of the Omega logo.

If you are stupid (like me) and chose engineering as your career, you are probably the sort of person that will find such buttons irresistible. You have already figured out that if you push on the thing, you can slide the cover plate out of the way to reveal the mechanism underneath with the hope of gaining better access to the spring bar from the rear.

What you need to know however, is that as you gently slide that plate to one side an impossibly small spring is going to fly out, at about Mach 3, bounce off your head and disappear into the furthest flung corner of your home/office etc. The spring is of course a vital part of the clasp release pusher mechanism which will not work without it. If you are lucky enough to recover this little bugger, you can look forward to a long night trying to re-fit it. You will make this mistake only once. Be warned…do not push the IDIOT BUTTON!

After such ordeals you will inevitably invest in a bag of spring bars and try “normal” straps. To this end my GM was forced to endure a Sinn 104 leather strap with a Citizen buckle, which was actually rather good, and even a non-Omega shark mesh bracelet..

..as well as a Rio Olympics NATO “swim lane” strap.

This is probably a good time to point out that the gap between the central body of the watch head and the spring bar is quite small.

The consequence of which is that not all straps / bracelets will fit. You can easily fit non-Omega thin NATOs to the GM,

..but the real Omega NATO straps are higher quality and a bit thicker which presents something of a challenge if you stick with the standard spring bars. The solution? Curved spring bars, which your Omega Boutique can supply.

Be careful if you decide to do the crazy shark-mesh thing. I think it looks great in a rebellious sort of way, but if the mesh links are on the thick side they are going to scrub on the watch head in the middle (where the spring bar to case gap is smallest).

Remember the controversial fluted bezel debate; “It’s a DateJust copy” vs “no, Omega were first” blah blah? Surprisingly I hardly notice the bezel anymore. I say surprisingly, because it was the feature that attracted me to the GM initially. It put on a most entertaining “light show” under the Omega Boutique spot lights. But this isn’t so noticeable under natural lighting and is completely overshadowed by the dial, which I will address below.

As an aside, the manufacturing process for the bezel is pretty interesting and you can see how Omega turns rather dull tungsten carbide into a sparkly jewel.

The case by comparison goes from dull to sparkly to subtle – nice!

And here are the case back bits’n’bobs for completeness.

That tungsten carbide bezel has proved to be very robust. Despite my best (worst?) efforts to mess up my GM, the bezel is still scratch-free….which is far more than can be said for the rest of the watch.

OK, now to the main selling point of the Globemaster – the dial design and colour.

I’m not a journalist or professional writer, so this is the point where I get hugely frustrated as I don’t have the poetry and eloquence to convey just how fabulous the blue Globemaster dial is.

Since I showed the case build up I suppose I ought to show how Omega transforms bare metal into the GMs Pièce De Résistance.

et voilà!

(I wish I had taken a better photo of this)

The dial will change apparent colour from one moment to the next depending on orientation and lighting conditions.

Sometimes it looks teal..

sometimes black

sometimes two dimensional (as above) then in the blink of an eye the three dimensional faceted “pie pan” reveals itself.

It can appear uniformly matt and then suddenly with a small rotation of the wrist you see the sunburst brushed surface sending two rays of light in opposite directions across the dial like a gamma ray pulsar.

18 months on and I am still surprised at the huge spectrum of emotions this watch dial triggers.

If this dial doesn’t make you smile then you are probably in need of a holiday in the sun.

The GM isn’t a Top Trumps bragging rights tool, rather a watch you have to own and experience to understand and if you find yourself in that fortunate club you will quickly forget any thoughts about loss of value or lack of double red this or precious metal that and simple smile whenever you have cause to glance down at your wrist to check the time; which will be more often than not.

Pricing and residual value is a bit of a moot point. Omega says the GM on a steel bracelet is worth 6300€ new. The grey market says otherwise. A good used one like mine can be had (in Germany) on Chrono24 for just 4200€ and unworn for 4500€, before you even start haggling. Will the price drop further? Probably, unless Omega artificially limits production numbers and starts hiking prices.

As before, you can find many photos of the GM dial here at OmegaForums, so go hunting and enjoy! The Globemaster is a visceral delight, whatever the specifications may or may not reveal.

FIN

Butik

Had the blue Globey before, then nothing, but this model was at the back of my had anyway, so got myself the white version now 😀

This is very NOT photogenic watch, perspective changes 180 degrees in real life. I have tried to show different colours at different light strengths & angles on below video, but still it's probably 25% of reality.

Duquephart

When I ordered the strap/clasp combo to go with my Globemaster on bracelet (as per your advice) the clasp was the same # but the strap was CUZ007465, which is what I came up with on the Omega site. I also ordered the correct springbars as they differ from the bracelet springbars. The strap does not fit the same as the one that comes on the watch. It's a "straight across" fit which does not conform as well to the case and hence leaves a more noticable gap which bothers me not at all. So ----- others taking your advice need to be aware that the aftermarket strap available is not the actual strap that comes with the starp version. Unless I'm missing something of course. The aftermarket strap is also not tan/calf on the inside ---- blue all around. Excellent thread and review by the way and much appreciated!

hen

Great review, I allways liked the Globemaster, after reading this I want it! You work for Omega marketing dont you! 😉

I tried to find a good review of the Mk 40, have you done one on yours? If not pretty please with sugar on top, could you do one?

Longbow

Ah, the Mk40 or Triple-Date; that was actually my first Omega and no I never did a review on it. What do you want to know about it? Maybe you should start a new thread and invite members to contribute their experiences.

hen

BTW is the cristal on the LE Railmaster saphire or hesalite?

Longbow

Since no one has put up a long(ish)-term ownership review of the Globemaster yet I thought I would have a go. It’s based on another post on OF in which I tried to highlight the main pros and cons of the GM with some additions here and there to fill a few gaps.

I won’t bore you with the story of its acquisition, nor the crazy antics that I have got up to with my GM (well perhaps one or two); rather I wanted to pull together some of the main observations, likes, dislikes and emotions that this watch have provoked. So, here are my thoughts on the Blue dial Omega Globemaster after (approximately) 18 month ownership.

Maybe I should start by saying a few words about size, weight and other dimensional stuff.

Considering a case diameter of 39mm, you would be forgiven for thinking that the Globemaster is a rather modest sized watch compared to Omega’s other offerings, but the dial represents a large part of that dimension (circa 30/31mm) with a feeling of a lot of open space between the inner tips of the hour markers, i.e. it looks bigger than it really is. From lug to lug it’s 46mm which is actually less than my latest acquisition, the ’57 LE Railmaster (48mm) although you wouldn’t believe it by just glancing at the two side-by-side.

The GM is not a lightweight. With a sapphire crystal and sapphire display back mounted on a steel bracelet you are looking at a max. weight of 162g; the watch head contributing 71g of that mass.

The mathematicians and accounts amongst you will have already figured out that the bracelet is a thumping 91g, which isn’t that surprising when you know that each removable link in the bracelet is at least 2g or more. Speaking of which, these things are worth a closer inspection.

They are not your ordinary oval, symmetrical affairs; almost every surface has a complex compound curve, they are truly miniature works of art, much like the rest of the watch. Everywhere you look on the GM there are subtle design features for you to discover and keep you fascinated in the months and years to come.

So, back to weight, the GM is heavy. If you are not a fan of heavier watches then the GM on steel is probably not for you. Perhaps you should be thinking about the OEM leather strap and deployant buckle combo…

….or looking more towards vintage Constellations, the one shown above far left comes in on the bracelet at a flyweight 80g!

A case thickness of 13mm is, in my opinion rather; well, thick, for any watch. I would have liked it to have been a little slimmer so that it would fit more easily under shirt cuffs with cuff-links.

It does fit but it’s tight.

Is the Globemaster a dress watch or a sports watch? It’s a question that seems to crop up quite often and I’m not sure that you can give a cut and dried answer. I think it does most things well but it works a little better with the more casual look; jeans and a polo shirt perhaps. It is a watch that encourages you to chill out, dump the suit and tie and go get a cool beer at the beach bar or hang out at the night club.

You might want to swap the leather strap for the bracelet before you go to the beach though.

On the subject of bracelets I must confess that I made the classic Noob mistake of buying my Globemaster on the leather strap first and later adding the stainless steel bracelet. This is an expensive way to acquire any watch. In my defence, I didn’t find the bracelet very comfortable initially. The strap by contrast was surprisingly comfy; better than any other I have tried. But I digress, so back to that steel bracelet.

If you put a GM with Steel bracelet on your wrist (where else?) and run your fingers over the watch head and bracelet you will have a smooth refined experience. The upper, outer edges of the bracelet and watch head are chamfered and polished. The bracelet is a precision piece of work with minimal gaps and tight tolerances; it’s a delight to look at and the feel matches the looks.

The only gap of note is where the bracelet meets the end links.

However, that high quality chamfered bracelet edge is not the one next to your skin. The lower edge of the bracelet is simple and sharp. It seemed to me to be razor sharp.

Why does Omega do this? It’s exactly the same issue on my new LE Railmaster, but it’s especially frustrating on the Globemaster because there is a chamfered polished edge on the underside of the watch head that suggests this feature could have been carried through into the bracelet, just like it has been done on the upper side, from watch head to bracelet.

Anyway, I finally got round to buying the bracelet and had those sharp edges knocked off with an almost imperceptibly small but beneficial extra radius added to the outer links.

Now the bracelet is super comfortable. Omega please note, I want to wear my watches on my wrist, not shave with them, so please dump the razor edge finish on future bracelets.

Remember the dress vs casual question? One point to note; if you have a habit of doing dumb-ass shit like me, such as putting your GM on a rock next to waves washing over a sandy beach …

…you are going to get lots of little sand corns in between those precision bracelet centre links, which will cause it to lock up in the most strange (unwearable) form. Still, easy enough to fix with 100m water resistance; just dunk it under the water, slosh it around a bit and leave it to dry off.

The “butterfly” clasp on the GM bracelet was the first that I had ever tried on an Omega, the others being sliding and/or fold-over types.

It seemed pretty fiddly initially but soon became second nature to operate. The quality of construction and finish is first class. I can remember thinking a month or so ago (while trying on the latest Rolex Sub) that the way it snapped shut was somehow more satisfying than on the Glidelock…which is already excellent. It’s also fairly low profile, well-formed and rather inconspicuous compared to other clasps, e.g. the latest ’57 Railmaster extension clasp.

The clasp can also act as a protector for the pretty caseback medallion

Since I thought the OEM Strap was so good I probably ought to say a few words on that topic. I don’t know if my particular model was a well-worn, broken in shop window display model or not but the strap was orders of magnitude better than any other new leather watch strap that I have tried. I can clearly recall my prevaricating and procrastination when asked if I wanted to buy the GM on its steel bracelet…

..but as soon as Peter (the sales guy in the OB) swapped it onto its leather strap I was hooked and I mean INSTANTLY!

In matters comfort and ease of use the strap plus deployant was everything that the bracelet wasn’t: lightweight, supple, comfortable, and easy to operate. So here’s a tip for you: OBs don’t like giving direct discounts (who does?), but they are a little more flexible when it comes to additional stuff purchased at the same time. So if you are going to by a regular Globemaster, buy it on the steel bracelet and haggle over additional strap(s) and deployant clasp.

Something to note about the OEM Omega leather deployant strap is that it is shaped to fit the watch head…

..and is not capable of being folded flat at the spring bar. If you try to do this you will just end up creasing the top of the strap as you can see in the next image.

So it is not ideal if you like to store your watches in those flat pouches.

Concerning colour there is something you should be aware of. The blue dial GM’s OEM strap looks black until you hit it with strong flash and see that it is in fact blue.

Under normal (read office) lighting conditions it mostly looks black but it will probably appear dark blue under natural sunlight. If you are one of those guys that likes to keep watch strap, belt and shoes reasonably colour matched then blue will eventually become a nuisance and you will consider swapping to some other colour…which is when the fun starts with the deployant, but I will come to that later.

If you trawl around OF for some of my earlier posts you will see that I have tried almost every conceivable strap and bracelet combination on my Globemaster. It’s been on the OEM blue leather strap, a light brown (non-Omega) one…

..a dark brown Omega one…

… the proper Omega deployant and a cheapy aftermarket depolyant (which was crap by the way).

Omega OEM strap changing is not per se particularly difficult, as their straps have handy cut-outs which ease spring bar tool access at the watch head. The same cannot be said for the strap end that fits into the deployant clasp. It’s a tight fit and I mean really tight fit between the strap and clasp, which of course looks great but is an absolute sod if you want to swap straps but only have one clasp. This is the moment when you turn the clasp over to see if there is an alternative way to improve spring bar access. It is also the point at which you discover ….THE IDIOT BUTTON.

That’s it, right there above the “E” of “Omega”.

There ought to be a hazard warning sign here instead of the Omega logo.

If you are stupid (like me) and chose engineering as your career, you are probably the sort of person that will find such buttons irresistible. You have already figured out that if you push on the thing, you can slide the cover plate out of the way to reveal the mechanism underneath with the hope of gaining better access to the spring bar from the rear.

What you need to know however, is that as you gently slide that plate to one side an impossibly small spring is going to fly out, at about Mach 3, bounce off your head and disappear into the furthest flung corner of your home/office etc. The spring is of course a vital part of the clasp release pusher mechanism which will not work without it. If you are lucky enough to recover this little bugger, you can look forward to a long night trying to re-fit it. You will make this mistake only once. Be warned…do not push the IDIOT BUTTON!

After such ordeals you will inevitably invest in a bag of spring bars and try “normal” straps. To this end my GM was forced to endure a Sinn 104 leather strap with a Citizen buckle, which was actually rather good, and even a non-Omega shark mesh bracelet..

..as well as a Rio Olympics NATO “swim lane” strap.

This is probably a good time to point out that the gap between the central body of the watch head and the spring bar is quite small.

The consequence of which is that not all straps / bracelets will fit. You can easily fit non-Omega thin NATOs to the GM,

..but the real Omega NATO straps are higher quality and a bit thicker which presents something of a challenge if you stick with the standard spring bars. The solution? Curved spring bars, which your Omega Boutique can supply.

Be careful if you decide to do the crazy shark-mesh thing. I think it looks great in a rebellious sort of way, but if the mesh links are on the thick side they are going to scrub on the watch head in the middle (where the spring bar to case gap is smallest).

Remember the controversial fluted bezel debate; “It’s a DateJust copy” vs “no, Omega were first” blah blah? Surprisingly I hardly notice the bezel anymore. I say surprisingly, because it was the feature that attracted me to the GM initially. It put on a most entertaining “light show” under the Omega Boutique spot lights. But this isn’t so noticeable under natural lighting and is completely overshadowed by the dial, which I will address below.

As an aside, the manufacturing process for the bezel is pretty interesting and you can see how Omega turns rather dull tungsten carbide into a sparkly jewel.

The case by comparison goes from dull to sparkly to subtle – nice!

And here are the case back bits’n’bobs for completeness.

That tungsten carbide bezel has proved to be very robust. Despite my best (worst?) efforts to mess up my GM, the bezel is still scratch-free….which is far more than can be said for the rest of the watch.

OK, now to the main selling point of the Globemaster – the dial design and colour.

I’m not a journalist or professional writer, so this is the point where I get hugely frustrated as I don’t have the poetry and eloquence to convey just how fabulous the blue Globemaster dial is.

Since I showed the case build up I suppose I ought to show how Omega transforms bare metal into the GMs Pièce De Résistance.

et voilà!

(I wish I had taken a better photo of this)

The dial will change apparent colour from one moment to the next depending on orientation and lighting conditions.

Sometimes it looks teal..

sometimes black

sometimes two dimensional (as above) then in the blink of an eye the three dimensional faceted “pie pan” reveals itself.

It can appear uniformly matt and then suddenly with a small rotation of the wrist you see the sunburst brushed surface sending two rays of light in opposite directions across the dial like a gamma ray pulsar.

18 months on and I am still surprised at the huge spectrum of emotions this watch dial triggers.

If this dial doesn’t make you smile then you are probably in need of a holiday in the sun.

The GM isn’t a Top Trumps bragging rights tool, rather a watch you have to own and experience to understand and if you find yourself in that fortunate club you will quickly forget any thoughts about loss of value or lack of double red this or precious metal that and simple smile whenever you have cause to glance down at your wrist to check the time; which will be more often than not.

Pricing and residual value is a bit of a moot point. Omega says the GM on a steel bracelet is worth 6300€ new. The grey market says otherwise. A good used one like mine can be had (in Germany) on Chrono24 for just 4200€ and unworn for 4500€, before you even start haggling. Will the price drop further? Probably, unless Omega artificially limits production numbers and starts hiking prices.

As before, you can find many photos of the GM dial here at OmegaForums, so go hunting and enjoy! The Globemaster is a visceral delight, whatever the specifications may or may not reveal.

FIN

Longbow

Since no one has put up a long(ish)-term ownership review of the Globemaster yet I thought I would have a go. It’s based on another post on OF in which I tried to highlight the main pros and cons of the GM with some additions here and there to fill a few gaps.

I won’t bore you with the story of its acquisition, nor the crazy antics that I have got up to with my GM (well perhaps one or two); rather I wanted to pull together some of the main observations, likes, dislikes and emotions that this watch have provoked. So, here are my thoughts on the Blue dial Omega Globemaster after (approximately) 18 month ownership.

Maybe I should start by saying a few words about size, weight and other dimensional stuff.

Considering a case diameter of 39mm, you would be forgiven for thinking that the Globemaster is a rather modest sized watch compared to Omega’s other offerings, but the dial represents a large part of that dimension (circa 30/31mm) with a feeling of a lot of open space between the inner tips of the hour markers, i.e. it looks bigger than it really is. From lug to lug it’s 46mm which is actually less than my latest acquisition, the ’57 LE Railmaster (48mm) although you wouldn’t believe it by just glancing at the two side-by-side.

The GM is not a lightweight. With a sapphire crystal and sapphire display back mounted on a steel bracelet you are looking at a max. weight of 162g; the watch head contributing 71g of that mass.

The mathematicians and accounts amongst you will have already figured out that the bracelet is a thumping 91g, which isn’t that surprising when you know that each removable link in the bracelet is at least 2g or more. Speaking of which, these things are worth a closer inspection.

They are not your ordinary oval, symmetrical affairs; almost every surface has a complex compound curve, they are truly miniature works of art, much like the rest of the watch. Everywhere you look on the GM there are subtle design features for you to discover and keep you fascinated in the months and years to come.

So, back to weight, the GM is heavy. If you are not a fan of heavier watches then the GM on steel is probably not for you. Perhaps you should be thinking about the OEM leather strap and deployant buckle combo…

….or looking more towards vintage Constellations, the one shown above far left comes in on the bracelet at a flyweight 80g!

A case thickness of 13mm is, in my opinion rather; well, thick, for any watch. I would have liked it to have been a little slimmer so that it would fit more easily under shirt cuffs with cuff-links.

It does fit but it’s tight.

Is the Globemaster a dress watch or a sports watch? It’s a question that seems to crop up quite often and I’m not sure that you can give a cut and dried answer. I think it does most things well but it works a little better with the more casual look; jeans and a polo shirt perhaps. It is a watch that encourages you to chill out, dump the suit and tie and go get a cool beer at the beach bar or hang out at the night club.

You might want to swap the leather strap for the bracelet before you go to the beach though.

On the subject of bracelets I must confess that I made the classic Noob mistake of buying my Globemaster on the leather strap first and later adding the stainless steel bracelet. This is an expensive way to acquire any watch. In my defence, I didn’t find the bracelet very comfortable initially. The strap by contrast was surprisingly comfy; better than any other I have tried. But I digress, so back to that steel bracelet.

If you put a GM with Steel bracelet on your wrist (where else?) and run your fingers over the watch head and bracelet you will have a smooth refined experience. The upper, outer edges of the bracelet and watch head are chamfered and polished. The bracelet is a precision piece of work with minimal gaps and tight tolerances; it’s a delight to look at and the feel matches the looks.

The only gap of note is where the bracelet meets the end links.

However, that high quality chamfered bracelet edge is not the one next to your skin. The lower edge of the bracelet is simple and sharp. It seemed to me to be razor sharp.

Why does Omega do this? It’s exactly the same issue on my new LE Railmaster, but it’s especially frustrating on the Globemaster because there is a chamfered polished edge on the underside of the watch head that suggests this feature could have been carried through into the bracelet, just like it has been done on the upper side, from watch head to bracelet.

Anyway, I finally got round to buying the bracelet and had those sharp edges knocked off with an almost imperceptibly small but beneficial extra radius added to the outer links.

Now the bracelet is super comfortable. Omega please note, I want to wear my watches on my wrist, not shave with them, so please dump the razor edge finish on future bracelets.

Remember the dress vs casual question? One point to note; if you have a habit of doing dumb-ass shit like me, such as putting your GM on a rock next to waves washing over a sandy beach …

…you are going to get lots of little sand corns in between those precision bracelet centre links, which will cause it to lock up in the most strange (unwearable) form. Still, easy enough to fix with 100m water resistance; just dunk it under the water, slosh it around a bit and leave it to dry off.

The “butterfly” clasp on the GM bracelet was the first that I had ever tried on an Omega, the others being sliding and/or fold-over types.

It seemed pretty fiddly initially but soon became second nature to operate. The quality of construction and finish is first class. I can remember thinking a month or so ago (while trying on the latest Rolex Sub) that the way it snapped shut was somehow more satisfying than on the Glidelock…which is already excellent. It’s also fairly low profile, well-formed and rather inconspicuous compared to other clasps, e.g. the latest ’57 Railmaster extension clasp.

The clasp can also act as a protector for the pretty caseback medallion

Since I thought the OEM Strap was so good I probably ought to say a few words on that topic. I don’t know if my particular model was a well-worn, broken in shop window display model or not but the strap was orders of magnitude better than any other new leather watch strap that I have tried. I can clearly recall my prevaricating and procrastination when asked if I wanted to buy the GM on its steel bracelet…

..but as soon as Peter (the sales guy in the OB) swapped it onto its leather strap I was hooked and I mean INSTANTLY!

In matters comfort and ease of use the strap plus deployant was everything that the bracelet wasn’t: lightweight, supple, comfortable, and easy to operate. So here’s a tip for you: OBs don’t like giving direct discounts (who does?), but they are a little more flexible when it comes to additional stuff purchased at the same time. So if you are going to by a regular Globemaster, buy it on the steel bracelet and haggle over additional strap(s) and deployant clasp.

Something to note about the OEM Omega leather deployant strap is that it is shaped to fit the watch head…

..and is not capable of being folded flat at the spring bar. If you try to do this you will just end up creasing the top of the strap as you can see in the next image.

So it is not ideal if you like to store your watches in those flat pouches.

Concerning colour there is something you should be aware of. The blue dial GM’s OEM strap looks black until you hit it with strong flash and see that it is in fact blue.

Under normal (read office) lighting conditions it mostly looks black but it will probably appear dark blue under natural sunlight. If you are one of those guys that likes to keep watch strap, belt and shoes reasonably colour matched then blue will eventually become a nuisance and you will consider swapping to some other colour…which is when the fun starts with the deployant, but I will come to that later.

If you trawl around OF for some of my earlier posts you will see that I have tried almost every conceivable strap and bracelet combination on my Globemaster. It’s been on the OEM blue leather strap, a light brown (non-Omega) one…

..a dark brown Omega one…

… the proper Omega deployant and a cheapy aftermarket depolyant (which was crap by the way).

Omega OEM strap changing is not per se particularly difficult, as their straps have handy cut-outs which ease spring bar tool access at the watch head. The same cannot be said for the strap end that fits into the deployant clasp. It’s a tight fit and I mean really tight fit between the strap and clasp, which of course looks great but is an absolute sod if you want to swap straps but only have one clasp. This is the moment when you turn the clasp over to see if there is an alternative way to improve spring bar access. It is also the point at which you discover ….THE IDIOT BUTTON.

That’s it, right there above the “E” of “Omega”.

There ought to be a hazard warning sign here instead of the Omega logo.

If you are stupid (like me) and chose engineering as your career, you are probably the sort of person that will find such buttons irresistible. You have already figured out that if you push on the thing, you can slide the cover plate out of the way to reveal the mechanism underneath with the hope of gaining better access to the spring bar from the rear.

What you need to know however, is that as you gently slide that plate to one side an impossibly small spring is going to fly out, at about Mach 3, bounce off your head and disappear into the furthest flung corner of your home/office etc. The spring is of course a vital part of the clasp release pusher mechanism which will not work without it. If you are lucky enough to recover this little bugger, you can look forward to a long night trying to re-fit it. You will make this mistake only once. Be warned…do not push the IDIOT BUTTON!

After such ordeals you will inevitably invest in a bag of spring bars and try “normal” straps. To this end my GM was forced to endure a Sinn 104 leather strap with a Citizen buckle, which was actually rather good, and even a non-Omega shark mesh bracelet..

..as well as a Rio Olympics NATO “swim lane” strap.

This is probably a good time to point out that the gap between the central body of the watch head and the spring bar is quite small.

The consequence of which is that not all straps / bracelets will fit. You can easily fit non-Omega thin NATOs to the GM,

..but the real Omega NATO straps are higher quality and a bit thicker which presents something of a challenge if you stick with the standard spring bars. The solution? Curved spring bars, which your Omega Boutique can supply.

Be careful if you decide to do the crazy shark-mesh thing. I think it looks great in a rebellious sort of way, but if the mesh links are on the thick side they are going to scrub on the watch head in the middle (where the spring bar to case gap is smallest).

Remember the controversial fluted bezel debate; “It’s a DateJust copy” vs “no, Omega were first” blah blah? Surprisingly I hardly notice the bezel anymore. I say surprisingly, because it was the feature that attracted me to the GM initially. It put on a most entertaining “light show” under the Omega Boutique spot lights. But this isn’t so noticeable under natural lighting and is completely overshadowed by the dial, which I will address below.

As an aside, the manufacturing process for the bezel is pretty interesting and you can see how Omega turns rather dull tungsten carbide into a sparkly jewel.

The case by comparison goes from dull to sparkly to subtle – nice!

And here are the case back bits’n’bobs for completeness.

That tungsten carbide bezel has proved to be very robust. Despite my best (worst?) efforts to mess up my GM, the bezel is still scratch-free….which is far more than can be said for the rest of the watch.

OK, now to the main selling point of the Globemaster – the dial design and colour.

I’m not a journalist or professional writer, so this is the point where I get hugely frustrated as I don’t have the poetry and eloquence to convey just how fabulous the blue Globemaster dial is.

Since I showed the case build up I suppose I ought to show how Omega transforms bare metal into the GMs Pièce De Résistance.

et voilà!

(I wish I had taken a better photo of this)

The dial will change apparent colour from one moment to the next depending on orientation and lighting conditions.

Sometimes it looks teal..

sometimes black

sometimes two dimensional (as above) then in the blink of an eye the three dimensional faceted “pie pan” reveals itself.

It can appear uniformly matt and then suddenly with a small rotation of the wrist you see the sunburst brushed surface sending two rays of light in opposite directions across the dial like a gamma ray pulsar.

18 months on and I am still surprised at the huge spectrum of emotions this watch dial triggers.

If this dial doesn’t make you smile then you are probably in need of a holiday in the sun.

The GM isn’t a Top Trumps bragging rights tool, rather a watch you have to own and experience to understand and if you find yourself in that fortunate club you will quickly forget any thoughts about loss of value or lack of double red this or precious metal that and simple smile whenever you have cause to glance down at your wrist to check the time; which will be more often than not.

Pricing and residual value is a bit of a moot point. Omega says the GM on a steel bracelet is worth 6300€ new. The grey market says otherwise. A good used one like mine can be had (in Germany) on Chrono24 for just 4200€ and unworn for 4500€, before you even start haggling. Will the price drop further? Probably, unless Omega artificially limits production numbers and starts hiking prices.

As before, you can find many photos of the GM dial here at OmegaForums, so go hunting and enjoy! The Globemaster is a visceral delight, whatever the specifications may or may not reveal.

FIN