Again! I'd like to know your opinions Omega Automatic Ref: 165.002 Cal. 552

Hnansen · Dec 30, 2018

hegner
Another question: hands have lume...indexes not...why do you say it's fine? Just wondering .

Neither the hands or indexes have lume. It's merely black paint, which is perfectly normal 😀

EDIT:
As Davidt wrote, it could be onyx as well. But I highly doubt it on a model like this.

hegner · Dec 30, 2018

Davidt
On the first watch you posted the hands don't have lume. It's onyx or black inlay.

Oh my God! I feel stupid...I guessed that was the status of a very old lume not onyx or black inlay. @Shabbaz posted his watch and I thought it as lume too...shame on me.

hegner · Dec 30, 2018

Hnansen
Neither the hands or indexes have lume. It's merely black paint, which is perfectly normal 😀

EDIT:
As Davidt wrote, it could be onyx as well. But I highly doubt it on a model like this.

You're right! Shame on me! Thank you!

Again! I'd like to know your opinions Omega Automatic Ref: 165.002 Cal. 552

Hnansen

hegner

hegner

Similar threads

Omega Ref.165.002 Cal. 552

Omega Automatic ref. 165.002 cal. 550 17J Stainless Steel

Omega Seamaster Automatic ref. 165.002 24j cal. 552 Stainless

Omega 30 T2 SC 700£ I’d like to know your opinion. Thank you