Advise on a C case Constellation I’m considering

Posts
4,558
Likes
11,606
MtV MtV
My apologies if my comment triggered frustration, but even though that wasn’t my intention I stand behind it in so far as I don’t consider it an exaggeration.

I owe you an apology. I misread your post as claiming you could get solid 18k WG watch with all the other stated parameters, which is not what you said. You said 18k bezel, not 18k watch. My mistake not yours. The private sales section on OF is indeed one of the best places to find good deal.
 
Posts
3,181
Likes
12,507
Ah, no worries - completely with you regarding not only an 18k WG but generally 18k whatever-gold examples. 😀
 
Posts
1,699
Likes
5,179
That's a pretty cool and expensive c-case. though it is white gold and a connie model with seemingly original parts.

just like to share my all original seamaster version day-date c-case, with metallic silver dial. it's a single piece case with special tool and full waterproof feature. note the tapered bracelet recently adapted by the newly released speedmaster 3861.


Edited:
 
Posts
324
Likes
451
MtV MtV
My apologies if my comment triggered frustration, but even though that wasn’t my intention I stand behind it in so far as I don’t consider it an exaggeration. I didn’t mean that this is a price you can pick these up for any day of the week, but if I may just point you to two examples that were sold here very recently:

https://omegaforums.net/threads/omega-constellation-c-case-ref-168-029-serviced-1-300.124274/

Serviced, WG bezel, brick bracelet, 1300$.

https://omegaforums.net/threads/fs-...rick-bracelet-nickel-grey-dial168-029.121876/

WH bezel, brick bracelet, equivalent of ~1000USD. Leaves 400$ for a service, which should be realistic.

Both examples aren’t perfect, but I like their condition and would absolutely wear them. Note that both have the grey dial, which personally I’d consider as more sought after than a regular white one.

These C Connies are beautiful pieces and I’m happy to have one in my collection, but they were produced in considerable numbers, so nice deals can be found with some patience. I’d say this is the right place for it. 😀

And if I may, a third example - this is mine. Also certainly not NOS, but I’d argue it’s in good nick, has a linen dial as a nice bonus and cost me ~1100$ serviced. Bought from a friendly member here.


That is a beauty, thanks for posting that - I agree these C Cases are stunning and your example with that dial and bezel is an excellent example of why these beat even Rolex in my opinion in terms of overall design (and of course movements)
 
Posts
16,251
Likes
44,727
....why these beat even Rolex in my opinion in terms of overall design (and of course movements)
Considering they have been beating the oyster to death for the last 60 years....
 
Posts
727
Likes
9,677
There are excellent examples of gold capped 168.017's out there! I found mine about this time last year...very little wear since 1968...

...still virtually unworn...

...as it's only been worn at home through the pandemic!

I posted many more pics on the C-Cased Constellation thread HERE

Happy hunting and good luck to the OP!
Edited:
 
Posts
613
Likes
10,919
Hi all,

Hope everyone is having a good Sunday. Wanted to circle back to this thread and show everyone what I ended up purchasing. I’m terrible at taking pictures, and only have my old iPhone to work with, so sorry for the poor shots. Definitely don’t do the dial justice. It is fantastic in the sun.

Anyway, ended up paying $1,100 for the gold capped example below. Came with receipts for a service ~6 months ago and a (hopefully) genuine gold plated Omega buckle. Keeping time at +4 second per day on my wrist per the Toolwatch app.

After sharing the first example with everyone, I realized that like 80% of these have the plating polished away on the tips of the lugs. This one seems to have escaped that fate fortunately, but does have a small nick on the lower right lug that looks to be from a sloppy strap change. Thanks for making me aware of the plating wear issue. This is my 2nd vintage piece (also have a 1948 Seamaster) and I’m very happy with it so far.
 
Posts
16,251
Likes
44,727
Hi all,

Hope everyone is having a good Sunday. Wanted to circle back to this thread and show everyone what I ended up purchasing. I’m terrible at taking pictures, and only have my old iPhone to work with, so sorry for the poor shots. Definitely don’t do the dial justice. It is fantastic in the sun.

Anyway, ended up paying $1,100 for the gold capped example below. Came with receipts for a service ~6 months ago and a (hopefully) genuine gold plated Omega buckle. Keeping time at +4 second per day on my wrist per the Toolwatch app.

After sharing the first example with everyone, I realized that like 80% of these have the plating polished away on the tips of the lugs. This one seems to have escaped that fate fortunately, but does have a small nick on the lower right lug that looks to be from a sloppy strap change. Thanks for making me aware of the plating wear issue. This is my 2nd vintage piece (also have a 1948 Seamaster) and I’m very happy with it so far.
Congrats man! I have seen gold plated bracelets for these if that kind of bling appeals, but these look great on leather or particularly suede
 
Posts
324
Likes
451
Considering they have been beating the oyster to death for the last 60 years....
@JwRosenthal interesting statement. Probably a subject for another thread - but I’m very interested why you think that’s the case. Better movements, dial design? The pie pan connies are a very different aesthetic to the rolex oyster which is less dressy. Anyway not disputing your opinion just like to read your take on it
 
Posts
16,251
Likes
44,727
@JwRosenthal interesting statement. Probably a subject for another thread - but I’m very interested why you think that’s the case. Better movements, dial design? The pie pan connies are a very different aesthetic to the rolex oyster which is less dressy. Anyway not disputing your opinion just like to read your take on it
Just in my opinion- Rolex has been pumping out different versions of the same design for the last 60+ years. Yes, they are all different in some way- and obviously it hasn’t hurt their sales in any way. But it just gets boring. I own 4 Rolex’s and love them all, they are all different- slightly, and for different purposes, but all variations on the theme. The Celinni line is about the only original product I can think of that they make.
Omega on the other hand is constantly reinventing design. Yes, they too have staples in their catalog that seldom change if at all (Speedmaster comes to mind) but if you were to lay out every distinct model (or revisions of a previous model) that Omega has produced in the last 60 years, next to ever model Rolex has made in the last 60 years- there is far more diversity and a clear desire to stay fresh and on the cutting edge of design (esthetic- not just engineering) in the Omega catalog.
 
Posts
324
Likes
451
Just in my opinion- Rolex has been pumping out different versions of the same design for the last 60+ years. Yes, they are all different in some way- and obviously it hasn’t hurt their sales in any way. But it just gets boring. I own 4 Rolex’s and love them all, they are all different- slightly, and for different purposes, but all variations on the theme. The Celinni line is about the only original product I can think of that they make.
Omega on the other hand is constantly reinventing design. Yes, they too have staples in their catalog that seldom change if at all (Speedmaster comes to mind) but if you were to lay out every distinct model (or revisions of a previous model) that Omega has produced in the last 60 years, next to ever model Rolex has made in the last 60 years- there is far more diversity and a clear desire to stay fresh and on the cutting edge of design (esthetic- not just engineering) in the Omega catalog.

Thanks for the reply - appreciate you taking the time. At the risk of hijacking the thread - I agree completely with what you've written. I have nothing against Rolex - I think a simple Oyster Perpetual is hard to beat as a piece of understated classic watch design - but for the past half century it seems they have been making incremental improvements to a select stable of watches. Whereas the willingness of Omega over the same period to embrace new directions and experiment is pretty remarkable. And at the same time pursuing engineering excellence. I read an excerpt from 'A Journey Through Time' that mentioned the feat of 100,000 consecutive 561 movements receiving chronometer status from the observatory tests. I have a C Case Connie that falls within that serial number range - so engineering excellence, combined with a new design. And even with C Case prices pushing up, as you've mentioned, they are still far better value compared to Rolex's similar offerings from that period.
 
Posts
16,251
Likes
44,727
Not off topic at all. The C-cased Connie is an example of spectacular design that captures the zeitgeist of the late 60’s. Space-age, sporty yet elegant, appealed to both hip youth and the stylish well established - truly a modern piece for a modern era.