Advice on Vintage Speedy Pre Moon?

Posts
11,627
Likes
37,363
Unfortunately, the I can't order one being from the states. Any solutions for me here?

You can, email [email protected] and they'll give you a form you can fill out and fax to them. Takes a little while (6-8 weeks) but it's doable.
 
Posts
1,235
Likes
3,845
You can, email [email protected] and they'll give you a form you can fill out and fax to them. Takes a little while (6-8 weeks) but it's doable.
Thanks, I shot them an email. I hope that goofy dial goes for bookoo bucks 👍
 
Posts
1,235
Likes
3,845
Little update on this guy - got my MWO book unpacked and have been flipping through it. I am thinking B3. Spaced T (1966/67-69) as the reference (p.94). I am still reading and looking through the distinct features though.


Also got the case back off and got some "new" numbers. I was pretty far off so I am not sure if we are still in the range on the cal. 321 for the case. (Haven't gotten that far in the book yet...)
Serial # 26,55X,XXX

 
Posts
1,235
Likes
3,845
is it me or does his "T" look a little too wide?
MWO states, "Spaced T's in T SWISS MADE T inscription (Ts between 32.0 and 31.8 seconds, left, and between 28.2 and 28.0 seconds, right)"

My left T's staff is just a hair to the left of the 31.8 (so in their parameter). My right T's staff is similarly a hair to the right of 28.2 (so in their parameter).

I am striking out with the extract. Any chance a nice non-US member would let me ship one to their house? I would obviously compensate you for shipping across the pond. It's a bummer I can't just order one myself.
 
Posts
17,533
Likes
26,534
MWO states, "Spaced T's in T SWISS MADE T inscription (Ts between 32.0 and 31.8 seconds, left, and between 28.2 and 28.0 seconds, right)"

My left T's staff is just a hair to the left of the 31.8 (so in their parameter). My right T's staff is similarly a hair to the right of 28.2 (so in their parameter).

I am striking out with the extract. Any chance a nice non-US member would let me ship one to their house? I would obviously compensate you for shipping across the pond. It's a bummer I can't just order one myself.
Call a US OB they will email you a form
To fill out and you can fax it back to them.
 
Posts
1,235
Likes
3,845
Call a US OB they will email you a form
To fill out and you can fax it back to them.
Not to sound incredibly dense, but do you have any suggestions for a decent one? Wyoming isn't known for their Omega Boutiques haha. This watch is definitely making read a little closer through my MWO book, thanks again @DLT222!

After running the serial number on Ilovemyspeedmaster (https://omegaforums.net/threads/speedmaster-production-dates-with-production-query-tool.59392/) I am only more curious.

Extract Prediction
1968, November

Moonwatch Only Tables
1967-68/69, ST145.012-67,-68, Caliber 321
1966-69, ST105.003-65,ST145.003, Caliber 321

 
Posts
17,533
Likes
26,534
Not to sound incredibly dense, but do you have any suggestions for a decent one? Wyoming isn't known for their Omega Boutiques haha. This watch is definitely making read a little closer through my MWO book, thanks again @DLT222!

After running the serial number on Ilovemyspeedmaster (https://omegaforums.net/threads/speedmaster-production-dates-with-production-query-tool.59392/) I am only more curious.

Extract Prediction
1968, November

Moonwatch Only Tables
1967-68/69, ST145.012-67,-68, Caliber 321
1966-69, ST105.003-65,ST145.003, Caliber 321
Costa Mesa, CA seems to have their shit together. Based on my and others interactions with them.
‭(714) 850-0558‬
 
Posts
1,235
Likes
3,845
Thanks @Foo2rama

I will go ahead and give them a call tomorrow. Now with the actual serial # I am starting to think I may have a replacement casebook? Guess I will find out soon enough. The extract is definitely worth it in my mind, even if the piece eventually gets sold. Thanks again
 
Posts
5,260
Likes
24,004
If I was a gambler I would put money this number is not from a 105.012

(Sorry)
 
Posts
5,260
Likes
24,004
Pretty sure the caseband is a 105.012-66HF.
 
Posts
1,235
Likes
3,845
Sorry
That's life my friend! I appreciate all the information.

This has been a bit of an adventure, I can see why @oddboy loves it so much. It was a pretty expensive adventure, but one I am sure I will repeat again (after loads more research).

Turns out not having the serial number pegged down until a month later really hampered any success on verification. So at the end of the day it looks like I have an incorrect case back, BUT still a really neat (and still valuable) watch.
 
Posts
11,627
Likes
37,363
The dial as discussed before is some version of a B3, but it has some differences which are curious but again, do not necessarily mean anything shady is going on.

Unfortunately the movement probably is not original. I believe the caseback is original to the watch, perhaps everything else is, but not the movement.
 
Posts
1,235
Likes
3,845
Interesting that they would put a movement that is only a couple years newer in it? I guess anything is possible.

The B3 on page 94 includes the date for the dial. I will look at MWO to see if I can find any case differences. What makes you think it is the wrong movement instead of the wrong case back? @abrod520
 
Posts
11,627
Likes
37,363
Interesting that they would put a movement that is only a couple years newer in it? I guess anything is possible.

The B3 on page 94 includes the date for the dial. I will look at MWO to see if I can find any case differences. What makes you think it is the wrong movement instead of the wrong case back? @abrod520

The case is a 105.012, with short pushers. The pushers on your watch are original, and were not added later at a service. As far as I know, they can't be fit to 145.012 cases either.

The movement is fairly late for a 145.012 as well, though it does fall into the proper range.

You have a very good-looking watch, and the original pushers are a huge plus for any 105.012, but I'm afraid the movement was most likely added after the watch was produced. It's not impossible that it was indeed produced by the factory ~2 years after most other 105.012-66 movements, and I do encourage you to seek an Extract to see if that might be the case, but I think that it'll either tell you it's a 145.012 (or, hopefully not, Seamaster) or they'll give you the "Information not available" runaround that might indicate it's not original.
 
Posts
9,217
Likes
24,048
Adam has some excellent point there. As a point of reference, my 145.012-68 is 26,554,xxx. Thats the end of the 321s except for a small batch in 27,320,xxxx.

Cal.861 started at 26,555,xxx I think. I'll find a thread with good info. (Update, https://omegaforums.net/threads/transition-to-the-transitional.47466/)

In any event, order an extract. If you submit it with case ref 105.012 and they say they don't have records, try again with case ref 145.012.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,770
Likes
7,705
Is that 3 in 30 observed in more wide spaced T's dials?

 
Posts
11,627
Likes
37,363
Is that 3 in 30 observed in more wide spaced T's dials?

Undoubtedly there's something strange about the dial, but I can't say with certainty that it's wrong. I do wonder if it had worn down in places and was touched up - but I do believe that whatever happened, it did indeed start life as a wide-T, long-index stepped dial. I don't think it's a service dial as I don't recall seeing or hearing of any stepped service dials.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

To @WYO_Watch, I don't know how much you paid for it, and I can't tell you what to do with it but if it were my watch I would lie in wait for a cheap 105.012 that has been festooned with service parts, and swap the movements.
 
Posts
206
Likes
737
I think something is off to the AML too. It looks different and the feets look wider.
 
Posts
206
Likes
737
But I find it hard to believe that a fake dial would look so good..