Forums Latest Members
  1. KingAlfonse Jul 6, 2020

    Posts
    49
    Likes
    10
  2. aprax Jul 7, 2020

    Posts
    315
    Likes
    940
    It's definitely not a 166.022, looks more like a 166.001. To me, it looks good otherwise.
     
    KingAlfonse likes this.
  3. Bumper Jul 7, 2020

    Posts
    627
    Likes
    1,156
    166.022 is a Cosmic reference. Best to ask the seller to confirm if this is correct.

    upload_2020-7-7_15-25-40.png
    upload_2020-7-7_15-25-56.png
    upload_2020-7-7_15-26-15.png
     
    KingAlfonse likes this.
  4. KingAlfonse Jul 7, 2020

    Posts
    49
    Likes
    10
    Yeah I don’t know why he lists it as that, very odd. May just not know? Thanks all!
     
  5. janice&fred Jul 7, 2020

    Posts
    4,593
    Likes
    10,441
    Yea probably a simple mistake or typo. looks like a nice watch.
     
  6. wilderbeast Jul 7, 2020

    Posts
    896
    Likes
    4,308
    Are there any movement photos, or service history? I like the outside but it would be good to know what’s under the hood.
     
  7. KingAlfonse Jul 7, 2020

    Posts
    49
    Likes
    10
    Asked about movement but he said he doesn’t trust himself to open it. He’s got great feedback on reddit, though.
     
  8. wilderbeast Jul 7, 2020

    Posts
    896
    Likes
    4,308
    If you pull the trigger, factor in another $200-300 for service. And ask your watchmaker to send you some nice photos of the inside when done so you get the movement serial number (which will help give a rough production date). The model reference will be on the inside caseback, too.
     
  9. KingAlfonse Jul 7, 2020

    Posts
    49
    Likes
    10
    Got caught up with work and missed out on it. Thanks for all the insight and feedback, all.