Hi all! Like many others, I need some advice as I’m looking to not only purchase my first Omega, but my first watch ever. I’ve tried to do as much research as possible and read around this forum.

I’ve found two different watches that I’m interested in. I’d love to get a second opinion on the condition and price of each watch.

Omega Seamaster Automatic – 1956 – 35 mm – $516
My own thoughts: I think the watch is beautiful and the patina is very nice. The case has a decent amount of wear and tear. The crown should be original, but the bracelet has been changed. The back of the watch is engraved – which I don’t mind at all – but is it something I can use to negotiate the price?


Omega 2639-12 – 1952 – 36 mm – $610
My own thoughts: Also a beautiful watch. I’m really drawn by the sub-dial. Omega crown but the bracelet has been changed. The seller said the dial has been renovated, and I guess this is a big no no?

 

I would not buy the second one. Dial is renewed. Nice, but redone! About the first one, without being an expert, it looks like an honest piece. No idea about price!! Good luck with the hunt.

 

Number two is not original. I personally love inscriptions. Given it a unique feeling and some historic value. Others however, think it lowers the value. I would be in the market for number one. Also because at this side of the globe (the Netherlands) I don’t see that price.... ;(

 

I don't like the Seamaster font on the first watch, the 'coathanger' shaped S was much more common in the 1950s. I tend to see the more rounded S design appear on later rotary automatic pieces. The font also seems a bit too bold, compared to font on the rest of the watch, suggesting a redial.
If I'm not making much sense, this thread might help: https://omegaforums.net/threads/question-re-seamaster-font.68732/
Additionally, the number six numeral looks like it's been poorly reattached to the dial, and the top of the number 3 numeral looks broken.

 

Agree with speedb comments about the first one...

But if you wanted to choose btw the two I'd vote for the first one.

 

The dial on the first one is okay, but it has been cleaned and I wouldn’t be surprised if that leftover patina isn’t all that even/attractive in better lighting. That paired with the inscription on the case back is a pass for me.

Agreed with previous comments on the second.

I recommend being patient and looking for better examples.

 

Thanks for all the replies - much appreciated!

Ah very interesting about the Seamaster font! And I notice the numerals now when you pointed it out. Thank you!

I'll probably end up with your recommendation and hold off until I find something better.

 

1st one is a good one. I’d buy it but already own a 58.

avoid the 2nd. Just feels off.