Advice Needed: Purchased Vintage Speedmaster

Posts
25
Likes
58
Hi Omega Forum Members,

Thank you in advance for taking the time to read through here and help in any way you can. I used to be a lurker on this forum and the Speedmaster is the watch that I kind of want to just walk off into the sunset with (or so I tell myself; along with the 20 other random entry-esque watches I have lol).

That being said, I would be very grateful with some advice on this watch I just picked up at a local auction that I frequent. Based on the research I've done and its attributes, I put it between 66-69? I am hoping it is a 105.012. I will put the details below along with the pictures I took.

Dial: Stepped, wide-T (or so I think), Applied Logo, Lume holds for a couple of seconds, not universally dirty.
Bezel: DON. Looks off-center, not sure if previous owner removed? Looks dirty around crystal as if it hasn't been touched.
Case: I can't seem to tell the difference between HF and CB lol. Has some nicks and gashes that are only apparent with Macro lens (pic below) but seems like it has never really be polished.
Caseback: Single step- I tried to carefully remove with my watch tools, but it did not want to budge so I did not want to take chance breaking anything or crystal. Has a couple of scratches like someone possibly tried previously.
Hands: Has the spear from the 105, not like the 145's.
Pushers: Missing one (can I buy a time-appropriate cap to just put on there lol?), looks like fat-necks? The one has indent on top. I can measure if anybody really wants.
Movement: Runs, Winds, but I only wound it one quarter turn just to check; didn't want to damage anything just in case.

So without further adieu, here are the pictures. It looks like it was either worn and loved, or sat in a drawer that got a lot of random scratching? I have ZERO history on it as I purchased it as-is from the auction. It looks in great condition when just glancing at it for the age when you see it with straps, etc below...
Thank you so much in advance!

First, Cell phone pics on straps:



Okay here are the regular pics from my actual Camera


Here are the pics with my Macro (Vintage AF 60mm Nikkor 2.8 for you camera peepz)

Gash here looks pretty bad, but if you look at regular pics and in person, you don't even really see it. The dent to its right stands out more.

Thank you again for your time, let me know what you think year-wise without me opening it. Watchmaker RGM isn't too far from me and maybe he'd do me a solid.

All the best!
Edited by a mod:
 
Posts
24,261
Likes
54,031
Looks like a nice pickup, but I think it's premature to ask for identification before you show the inside.
It doesn't appear to have 105.012 pushers or CB facet, so there's no particular reason to guess it's a 105.012 vs. 145.012, especially given the wide-T dial. You will need to open it up.
Edited by a mod:
 
Posts
25
Likes
58
Looks like a nice pickup, but I think it's premature to ask for identification before you show the inside.
It doesn't appear to have 105.012 pushers or CB facet, so there's no particular reason to guess it's a 105.012 vs. 145.012, especially given the wide-T dial. You will need to open it up.

Hi Dan, Thank you very much for the prompt reply to my post, it is much appreciated. I just went and measured the pushers and you may be correct, as they are 3.5mm by 5mm. To the selling comment: We all have to start somewhere in the watch-collecting world and I am not fortunate enough to play with the big boys in terms of price, and I am not trying to be clever to gain interest. I was simply coming as a novice.
Edited by a mod:
 
Posts
825
Likes
1,804
Well I don’t reckon Omega would buy it from you.

it’s pretty simple to open the back with a basic cheap case opener. You won’t know much of anything without getting it opened.
 
Posts
25
Likes
58
Well I don’t reckon Omega would buy it from you.

it’s pretty simple to open the back with a basic cheap case opener. You won’t know much of anything without getting it opened.

Thank you for the reply, it seems that the consensus is to try again to get the caseback open. I have a 3pronger and a 2pronger, both of which would not budge it. I will try to tape it up again tonight and see if I can get it open and see which year and movement. The seal is probably old as dirt and sticking like mud lol
 
Posts
24,261
Likes
54,031
I am assuming an AD or even Omega Store wouldn't want to do anything with it, or just low ball me anyway?

In my experience, ADs or Omega Stores don't really care to buy or sell vintage pieces except maybe to lowball you if you are trying to do a trade-in. That's probably not a viable approach.

Thank you for the reply, it seems that the consensus is to try again to get the caseback open. I have a 3pronger and a 2pronger, both of which would not budge it. I will try to tape it up again tonight and see if I can get it open and see which year and movement. The seal is probably old as dirt and sticking like mud lol

You don't want to scratch up the back. If it's really stuck, and you don't have all the right equipment to use (case holder, vise, press-style case opener), you might want to have an experienced watchmaker do it for you. Then just have him install the back hand-tight afterwards so you can take good photos at your leisure.
 
Posts
4,593
Likes
10,810
I have a 3pronger and a 2pronger, both of which would not budge it.

Yea at this point I think you better wait and get a pro to open it.
 
Posts
825
Likes
1,804
It sounds like there may be gremlin squatters inside holding it shut. If you do try again make sure it’s pitch dark in the room so you don’t scare them too much.
 
Posts
25
Likes
58
In my experience, ADs or Omega Stores don't really care to buy or sell vintage pieces except maybe to lowball you if you are trying to do a trade-in. That's probably not a viable approach.



You don't want to scratch up the back. If it's really stuck, and you don't have all the right equipment to use (case holder, vise, press-style case opener), you might want to have an experienced watchmaker do it for you. Then just have him install the back hand-tight afterwards so you can take good photos at your leisure.

Thanks again Dan, I appreciate you taking the time to help advise me with this! I will see what I can do and what kind of resources I have near me, especially with Corona..
 
Posts
25
Likes
58
It sounds like there may be gremlin squatters inside holding it shut. If you do try again make sure it’s pitch dark in the room so you don’t scare them too much.
Hahaha That was pretty good comical relief. They're working over-time (or "under 'time'" in this case, badum-tsss) 😁
 
Posts
25
Likes
58
105.012-66 HF or 145.012 👍
I appreciate the reply. The pushers almost give it away at the size for 145.012, but here's to hoping it's 105.012 - the anticipation is building for sure haha.
 
Posts
825
Likes
1,804
I guess the bigger question is what did you purchase it for and where was the auction? Did it “slip through the cracks”?
 
Posts
825
Likes
1,804
Yeah the Auction was a local one here on the East Coast, US. I have purchased other items from them and actually they had a Rolex Explorer Vintage ALBINO which is mythical that went for $12k but I didn't have the stomach to purchase it even though one sold at Christie's for an insane amount. This was about $4,400 all said and done after taxes and fees which were upwards of $700. More than I wanted to spend but I was assuming it was a 105.012 from seeing it only based on pics.
Well we all wait with baited breath to see what the Gremlins unleash once the case back is opened and it’s secrets revealed .
 
Posts
2,315
Likes
5,697
This is 145.012-67 in the 26.0XX.XXX serial range from the first or second quarter of 1968.
Looks like a nice all original example.
DM me, I have an original pusher for you.
 
Posts
391
Likes
336
This is 145.012-67 in the 26.0XX.XXX serial range from the first or second quarter of 1968.
Looks like a nice all original example.
DM me, I have an original pusher for you.
Now that's looking out for someone.
 
Posts
2,315
Likes
5,697
I will try to tape it up again tonight and see if I can get it open
I would strongly recommend against it.
You will most likely damage the caseback.
Take it to a watchmaker who has a table-mounted opener.
 
Posts
25
Likes
58
This is 145.012-67 in the 26.0XX.XXX serial range from the first or second quarter of 1968.
Looks like a nice all original example.
DM me, I have an original pusher for you.

Wow, your response is not only very accurate on the watch (I'll post after this reply), but makes me feel very welcome to this forum and all of you being quite a family.
 
Posts
1,206
Likes
5,036
Looks like a seriously nice piece for 4400! Nice purchase.