GreekOmega
·Hi Omega Forum Members,
Thank you in advance for taking the time to read through here and help in any way you can. I used to be a lurker on this forum and the Speedmaster is the watch that I kind of want to just walk off into the sunset with (or so I tell myself; along with the 20 other random entry-esque watches I have lol).
That being said, I would be very grateful with some advice on this watch I just picked up at a local auction that I frequent. Based on the research I've done and its attributes, I put it between 66-69? I am hoping it is a 105.012. I will put the details below along with the pictures I took.
Dial: Stepped, wide-T (or so I think), Applied Logo, Lume holds for a couple of seconds, not universally dirty.
Bezel: DON. Looks off-center, not sure if previous owner removed? Looks dirty around crystal as if it hasn't been touched.
Case: I can't seem to tell the difference between HF and CB lol. Has some nicks and gashes that are only apparent with Macro lens (pic below) but seems like it has never really be polished.
Caseback: Single step- I tried to carefully remove with my watch tools, but it did not want to budge so I did not want to take chance breaking anything or crystal. Has a couple of scratches like someone possibly tried previously.
Hands: Has the spear from the 105, not like the 145's.
Pushers: Missing one (can I buy a time-appropriate cap to just put on there lol?), looks like fat-necks? The one has indent on top. I can measure if anybody really wants.
Movement: Runs, Winds, but I only wound it one quarter turn just to check; didn't want to damage anything just in case.
So without further adieu, here are the pictures. It looks like it was either worn and loved, or sat in a drawer that got a lot of random scratching? I have ZERO history on it as I purchased it as-is from the auction. It looks in great condition when just glancing at it for the age when you see it with straps, etc below...
Thank you so much in advance!
First, Cell phone pics on straps:
Okay here are the regular pics from my actual Camera
Here are the pics with my Macro (Vintage AF 60mm Nikkor 2.8 for you camera peepz)
Gash here looks pretty bad, but if you look at regular pics and in person, you don't even really see it. The dent to its right stands out more.
Thank you again for your time, let me know what you think year-wise without me opening it. Watchmaker RGM isn't too far from me and maybe he'd do me a solid.
All the best!
Thank you in advance for taking the time to read through here and help in any way you can. I used to be a lurker on this forum and the Speedmaster is the watch that I kind of want to just walk off into the sunset with (or so I tell myself; along with the 20 other random entry-esque watches I have lol).
That being said, I would be very grateful with some advice on this watch I just picked up at a local auction that I frequent. Based on the research I've done and its attributes, I put it between 66-69? I am hoping it is a 105.012. I will put the details below along with the pictures I took.
Dial: Stepped, wide-T (or so I think), Applied Logo, Lume holds for a couple of seconds, not universally dirty.
Bezel: DON. Looks off-center, not sure if previous owner removed? Looks dirty around crystal as if it hasn't been touched.
Case: I can't seem to tell the difference between HF and CB lol. Has some nicks and gashes that are only apparent with Macro lens (pic below) but seems like it has never really be polished.
Caseback: Single step- I tried to carefully remove with my watch tools, but it did not want to budge so I did not want to take chance breaking anything or crystal. Has a couple of scratches like someone possibly tried previously.
Hands: Has the spear from the 105, not like the 145's.
Pushers: Missing one (can I buy a time-appropriate cap to just put on there lol?), looks like fat-necks? The one has indent on top. I can measure if anybody really wants.
Movement: Runs, Winds, but I only wound it one quarter turn just to check; didn't want to damage anything just in case.
So without further adieu, here are the pictures. It looks like it was either worn and loved, or sat in a drawer that got a lot of random scratching? I have ZERO history on it as I purchased it as-is from the auction. It looks in great condition when just glancing at it for the age when you see it with straps, etc below...
Thank you so much in advance!
First, Cell phone pics on straps:
Okay here are the regular pics from my actual Camera
Here are the pics with my Macro (Vintage AF 60mm Nikkor 2.8 for you camera peepz)
Gash here looks pretty bad, but if you look at regular pics and in person, you don't even really see it. The dent to its right stands out more.
Thank you again for your time, let me know what you think year-wise without me opening it. Watchmaker RGM isn't too far from me and maybe he'd do me a solid.
All the best!
Edited by a mod:















