Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice Is this

Posts
8
Likes
0
Hi all,

I’m trying to educate myself on vintage watches, and in doing so this forum has been of great help.
Thanks a lot to the members for gathering such precious knowledge !

I’m writing this post because I came along an ad depicting an « original » dial (though I guess some dishonest sellers might argue that refinished is still original) yet it seems odd to me (and if it seems odd…). Especially the length of the minute markers varying ring some kind of red alert in my mind.

Add is here https://www.sometimespassion.com/en/page-d-articles/o-7

And below are a couple of pictures, if some you could enlighten me with your advice (just a precision : I’m not willing to buy that watch, just trying to find out if the dial has been refinished…)

Thanks
Olivier

 
Posts
6,646
Likes
10,262
I don’t see the varying minute haches.
It looks like a nice watch.
These ‘hidden crown’ Constellations often have their minute haches hard up against the pie pan edge.

Edit
€3,250 is a very high price for a gold capped 168.004.
 
Posts
8
Likes
0
Thanks !
Must be me then (to my eye for instance 27, 28 seem longer than 29 minute markers, and 32 and 33 seem longer than 31). Since some markers angles seem a bit off to me as well, could be the angle of the picture combined with the fact that they are right on the pie-pan edge that creates an effect leading me to this incorrect conclusion…
Feeling the same as you on the price, one of the reasons I’m not interested in buying it 😉
 
Posts
2,397
Likes
2,558
18 vs 19 and 21 vs 22 are the worst ones for me. But at that price, its a non starter for me anyway.
 
Posts
6,646
Likes
10,262
In some ways, I’m more perturbed by the angle of the minute haches between 7 & 8.

However, you have to look at the dial overall and it appears to be fine to me.

These painted .004 pie pans are always quite difficult to assess, compared to the sharp edged versions.

Here is my late version .004 to compare to.
The fonts are very much the same as the OP watch.
(there looks to be missing or faded text but it’s just the crystal / image artefacts)

(Apologies- I swapped the images as the other one was an .010 not a .004)
Edited:
 
Posts
2,278
Likes
3,118
The font we see here looks very authentic, the delicate serifs and the very slim cross hair is more important than the minute markers IMO. Cross hair is ecactly positioned
 
Posts
8
Likes
0
Thank you, instructive indeed ! I guess I might be becoming a bit too much skeptical and seeing redials everywhere now 😅😉
 
Posts
6,646
Likes
10,262
Thank you, instructive indeed ! I guess I might be becoming a bit too much skeptical and seeing redials everywhere now 😅😉
That is a healthy starting point - but once you’ve viewed a thousand dials you’ll get your eye in.
 
Posts
1,252
Likes
6,629
Yeah I do see what you mean, the minutes markers appear to not be perfectly aligned; I don't think they're necessarily not the same size/length, I think they're just aligned some further inwards (to my eye)



I'm not familiar with these vintage omega watches, at all, but what I generally do is go to google images and type in the watch + new old stock, so here I've just searched for "168.004 omega new old stock", this has yielded a few results, like here:https://parkersjewellers.co.uk/prod...glFtiu8FHB_bReOpZwL4er8ieovzi95G0cwUIx_VfPpEq
Also here:
https://www.chrono24.co.uk/omega/constellation-pie-pan-de-luxe-new-old-stock--id45293351.htm

Looks consistent that these are also having this same unaligned markers. So that's a positive! outside of doing something like this I think it can be hard to fully say for sure. I'd say it looks like not-a-redial, realistically though in my opinion it can be difficult to 100% say for sure with anything in the vintage space. There's a point though where, reprinting these things to such an accuracy basically means you need industrial tools, not eye-and-hand, so it's probably not a redial (the lines we're looking at are fractions of a milimeter) so I think you're fine! It does feel expensive for a gold plated watch as others have said, typically gold plated is less desirable than steel.

Overall though this is what I personally do to try and authenticate, and build a basis of evidence. Some vintage watches (particularly 50s or 40s and older) I think genuinely had quite a variance coming out of the factory (i.e. there are a huge amount of variants of the font style of the IWC vintage watches) and also some factory pieces at this time genuinely were not perfect either with tolerances, so I'd say don't get too picky with looking pixel-by-pixel on zoomed in photos. Even modern Rolexes have been noted to have significant dial printing issues once you zoom in. Good luck!
 
Posts
169
Likes
163
I think the dial is original, but the price is a bit steep.

Chris