Forums Latest Members
  1. Leostaicalmo Jan 24, 2022

    Posts
    75
    Likes
    141
    Hello guys,

    I'm looking to buy this watch from Chrono 24, but I have a doubt concerning the caliber.
    The seller says that the watch is from 1954, but I though this type of dial was typical during the second world war.
    Could it be a rebuilt watch?
    Thanks as always for your precious comments,

    Leo

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Age ca.: 1954
    Case / Ref.: Stainless Steel Snap – Back Case, Ref. 2639-1, original Crown with Omega – Logo
    Dial: champaige and black original Dial (aged), arabic Numerals, steel luminous Hands, auxiliary Second
    Movement: gold – plated 17 Jewel Movement # 14.299.810, Cal. 265, Shock – Protection ” Incabloc “
    Condition: very nice original condition
    Origin: Switzerland
     
  2. ConElPueblo Jan 24, 2022

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    It is the correct dial, but the condition of dial, hands and case is hardly "very nice original condition". The dial has been cleaned, the hands are relumed and the case is quite polished. Crown is for a different reference.
     
    Dr No, bardamu, DaveK and 4 others like this.
  3. Dan S Jan 24, 2022

    Posts
    18,813
    Likes
    43,263
    The serial number suggests ~1951, not 1954.
     
    efauser likes this.
  4. skand Jan 24, 2022

    Posts
    516
    Likes
    7,256
    Someone tried to wash the shield, if it has not been properly protected it will turn black.
     
  5. Leostaicalmo Jan 24, 2022

    Posts
    75
    Likes
    141
    Thanks, I get your points, how can you say the crown is not correct?
     
  6. Leostaicalmo Jan 24, 2022

    Posts
    75
    Likes
    141
    What do you mean by shield?
     
  7. Dan S Jan 24, 2022

    Posts
    18,813
    Likes
    43,263
    It is an Omega crown, but not the correct crown for that particular watch from that year. You can tell from the shape of the crown and knowledge about the crowns that Omega used in various watches over time.
     
    konung39 and Leostaicalmo like this.
  8. Leostaicalmo Jan 24, 2022

    Posts
    75
    Likes
    141
    Actually, would you go more for this one? I dislike the way they relumed the hands... this one is from ca 1944, with cal. 30T2.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  9. ConElPueblo Jan 24, 2022

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    Despite the similar dials they are two quite different references. The 2639 is 36mm big while this one is about 32-33mm it would seem. I like the design though the case is quite polished.
     
  10. Leostaicalmo Jan 24, 2022

    Posts
    75
    Likes
    141
    Thanks, you are right, this one is 32,5 mm while the other is 36 mm. I like both of them, they have the same price, probably this last one has more history (and the original crown)... but this lum??? what do you think about it? Isn't it a punch in the face? ::facepalm2::
     
  11. nicks Jan 24, 2022

    Posts
    306
    Likes
    244
    “Punch in the face” for me, definitely. Wow, bad move…

    I guess you could see about replacing the hands, if the price is right.
     
    Leostaicalmo likes this.
  12. ConElPueblo Jan 24, 2022

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    Not the original crown either :)
     
    Dr No and Leostaicalmo like this.
  13. Leostaicalmo Jan 24, 2022

    Posts
    75
    Likes
    141
    Hahaha classic
     
  14. Leostaicalmo Jan 28, 2022

    Posts
    75
    Likes
    141
    Hello guys, I took it...
    I asked for a discount based on your observations, thanks a lot.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Vitezi likes this.
  15. Leostaicalmo Jan 28, 2022

    Posts
    75
    Likes
    141
    [​IMG]
     
    bardamu likes this.
  16. Vitezi Jan 28, 2022

    Posts
    3,098
    Likes
    13,457
    Looks good on the wrist! :thumbsup: