A Speedmaster 145.012 with a CB case; can't be right, can it?

Posts
1,537
Likes
6,709
Hi all,

As part of a larger parts trade, I have recently obtained this "145.012" case, which at first glance seems to be an older 105.012-66 case with the common higher 145.012 service pushers. So, I thought little of it at first.

Until I turned the case over and found a nicely sharp double beveled case back in a condition matching the case and bezel (being pretty good and sharp), which is strange as a double beveled case back matches neither a 145.012, nor a CB cased 105.012-66.

Subsequently, I had a closer look at the inside of the caseback, which is made by HF and stamped 145.012. The engraved rectangular shape could be hiding an earlier 105.012 designation.

Some research here revealed that there are more 'double reference' examples (1) out there (2), but neither is exactly like this one. Our member @ndgal also pointed out that some 145.012's came with a CB case and HF case back, as he writes on his insightful blog:

Observed on reference 105.012-66 CB, 145.012-67 SP2.

The manufacture of the Speedmaster Professional case by La Centrale Boites started around July of 1967.
This case differs from every Speedmaster Professional case that came before and after it.
Easily recognizable by the the distinctive ‘Flat-top’ lugs.
*Even though the 105.012-66 reference was replaced in 1968 by reference 145.012-67, the CB caseband was still used until late 1968 and several examples have been documented to have a caseback manufactured by Huguenin Frères stamped 145.012-67 SP2 married to the 105.012-66 CB caseband.

Whilst one would think this seals the deal, it's odd to see mine doesn't have an SP2 marking.

All this leaves me wondering; am I now holding onto one of these? Curious to find out whether there's more of these examples out there!
 
Posts
2,621
Likes
5,843
Mystery watch nr 2??

Let me check....be back in a few months!
😁
 
Posts
373
Likes
3,507
As an aside, the font of the numbers engraved on the caseback seem similar to those of a -69 I have.
My watch was delivered to Venezuela in 1971.

Cheers,
-GW


 
Posts
786
Likes
841
Nice find! Does yours have service press fit pushers or was it converted to threaded pushers?

I have a double stamped 145.012 / 105.012-66 CB caseback. It seems to have originally been a 105.012-66 CB caseback with a 145.012 engraving added later (appears factory). The orignal midcase is overpolished, but I suspect it is/was a 105.012-66 CB with threaded pushers. After digging around, there seems to be a quite a few of these wonky speedmasters with serials that would lead one to believe that they may be transitional verisons. It may also be the case that HQ had old service parts that they updated/adapted and used up.

I think both may be true.

The double step caseback is interesting. I found an odd one that I posted here: https://omegaforums.net/threads/odd-double-step-speedmaster-caseback-1x5012-68-sp.180648/

Another example and a watch that I now own: https://omegaforums.net/threads/requesting-help-with-a-speedmaster-321-105012-66-cb-question.54798/
Edited:
 
Posts
1,537
Likes
6,709
Nice find! Does yours have service press fit pushers or was it converted to threaded pushers?
Thank you! And honestly, it is fitted with threaded pushers and looking at how that has been done and knowing that a 145.-12-67 should have screw-in pushers either way, I suspect it to be 'original'. That, however, is not a fact, but simply adds to the mystery of this particular case.
 
Posts
1,537
Likes
6,709
As an aside, the font of the numbers engraved on the caseback seem similar to those of a -69 I have.
Great spot! I've got absolutely no idea where my case comes from, but do agree that the font and positioning looks very similar. Out of curiosity, does your extract simply state Venezuela? Or any more details like military, or exchange, etc.?
 
Posts
786
Likes
841
it is fitted with threaded pushers and looking at how that has been done and knowing that a 145.-12-67 should have screw-in pushers either way, I suspect it to be 'original'.
I agree. Enough seems to line up to support that conclusion.
 
Posts
1,577
Likes
10,278
Milling is obvious on the case back, engraving 145.012 seems professionally done... Nice work on it! Adding mystery on the mystery....
 
Posts
648
Likes
1,228
These engraving are a stock number from a local Venezuelan reseller, Salvador Cupello for what i remember
 
Posts
373
Likes
3,507
Great spot! I've got absolutely no idea where my case comes from, but do agree that the font and positioning looks very similar. Out of curiosity, does your extract simply state Venezuela? Or any more details like military, or exchange, etc.?
Hi @Aludic The extract just says Venezuela.
I was able to find the listing from when I bought it, see the note at the bottom.

Cheers,
-GW
 
Posts
1,537
Likes
6,709
Very interesting responses, thank you @G-Web ,@perenowell ,@befobe, @masteroftime and others! Now all that's left for me is to decide what to do with this case, I can either part it out and sell it, or try to source a matching 145.012 movement and dial... Not sure yet.
 
Posts
5,351
Likes
24,444
I have seen this before - I do not know the original source, but I have seen it before.

What is curious is that the removal or obliteration of the original 105012 reference is not consistent. Sometimes it is not removed at all.

All the ones I have seen have been double bevelled case backs. And normal size pushers.

I dont know if Omega did this, or distributors, or watchmakers.
 
Posts
1,828
Likes
3,567
Very interesting responses, thank you @G-Web ,@perenowell ,@befobe, @masteroftime and others! Now all that's left for me is to decide what to do with this case, I can either part it out and sell it, or try to source a matching 145.012 movement and dial... Not sure yet.
Hi Aludic,
i have this CB one with removed number and added 145.012 SP and a single bevel.

 
Posts
1,828
Likes
3,567
Another example from C24 with the original number still intact, movement nr 273254?? so very late for a 145.012. Double bevel caseback. Maybe a complete movement change and thus a new ref nr ?

edit ; correct link in message below



edit ; 2nd pic upload failed so here it is

Edited:
 
Posts
1,537
Likes
6,709
Another example from C24 with the original number still intact, movement nr 273254?? so very late for a 145.012. Double bevel caseback. Maybe a complete movement change and thus a new ref nr ?

www.chrono24.nl/omega/omega-speedmaster-moonwatch-chronograph-pre-moon-10501265--id40738179



edit ; 2nd pic upload failed so here it is

Unfortunately the link is a dead end for me, but it is an interesting specimen indeed. 2732xxxx would be very much an outlier in 321 Speedmasters. The highest serial I've ever seen on an EoA is 26554xxx (twice). So a very odd watch, to say the least.
 
Posts
1,537
Likes
6,709

Thank you! I’m not sure we’re going to learn much of this watch. It looks suspiciously franken or at least highly prepped to me. Highest 321 serial I’ve ever seen (by a mile), washed dial, and freshly polished, sitting on a later service bracelet. What might be interesting is that the caseback is indeed the double beveled version of a 105.012, but the pushers are 145.012. A swap of pushers could have been part of the large overhaul it’s had, but who knows…
 
Posts
1,828
Likes
3,567
A bit of a weirdo watch for sure.
MWO does mention a final batch of 1000 movements 27.320.000 - 27.320.999 cal 321 seen in a few 145.012 and for spare movements, but very rare.
Maybe they had Friday Afternoon Swap Parts back then at Omega like we now have Friday Afternoon Beers after work 😜.