A new Aquisition (Speedmaster)

Posts
5,258
Likes
23,997
Recently I acquired this watch from a gentleman from USA who bought this speedmaster from a local jeweler.

I would not call him a Speedmaster collector like some of us, rather an vintage watch enthusiast. Unfortunately he fell out of love with the watch and returned it to the jeweler who offered him a little over half what he paid. It is one of the situations I was hoping to help people prevent when I made the site www.speedmaster101.com

I bought the watch, for what we all considered a fair price, and now we can learn, and I can have some fun by restoring it, gently. It can be more interesting to go through a watch with issues, rather than a perfect one with nothing to learn from.

Although part of the collapse of the attraction in this watch must have been the excessive price, now that has been addressed, albeit painfully for the seller, its still a good watch. Now the seller can move on in his watch journey, without the constant reminder of overpaying (and perhaps being oversold by a dealer).

This watch, by chance, has all the right characteristics that allows it to be traded at a price higher than its worth. I would go so far to say it is the perfect dealer watch, as it ticks the right originality boxes and its quality issues are hidden to novice buyers.



The first step is to identify it.

Dial is long indices, Applied Metal Logo and stepped.
Pushers are standard size
Asymmetric case.

So we can see if it is original specification it is a 145.012 or a Transitional 145.022-68....



We can see its a Transitional.

The interesting thing about this watch is that it photographs better than it is in real life.



The bezel looks better in this photo than in real life. There is a dent at 75/80 but that isn't the issue, its the general decay that looks more of a snowstorm than it does here in the photo.

The dial, however is fabulous - except for one issue. There is a dark mark on the once o'clock marker, and that is the only thing i can find to fault it. By my grading, that stops it being an "Excellent" dial, but it is a "Very Good+"


Here we can see the dial, which is flawless, except for the marker. Any other marks you might see are on the (original Vintage) crystal:



The next issue on this watch is the case. It has been polished, so that the outlines are no longer stock.

Subsequently it has acquired some damage, one of which is unsightly and irreparable. A sharp ding right in the middle of the case band:




That little ding is deep - too deep to polish out and lasering would require an entire case refinish. So its here to stay.

The photo below clearly shows the loss of definition along the lugs, from the previous polish. As I mentioned, this doesn't look as bad in photos as it does in real life. This is the first time I have had this where a watch doesn't look as good in real life, at least where no deception is intended.



If we flip it over we see the case back has some cross hatching polish - why? Sometimes I see this when an engraving has been removed, but this doesn't look deep, and I cant see any vestiges of engraving - perhaps just carelessness.




The movement is ok - its not excellent, as we see several screw heads damaged.




While we are looking at the above photo, we can see the crown looks a bit off to me, and may not be correct - I will replace it with the correct crown, and one of the pushers is dirty and the other clean - I would rather have two matching pushers, so that's on the list.

So here are the issues that downgrade this watch, in order of value influence:

The case: This case is actually terrible. Deep damage, previous polish, change of outlines. Cross hitch damage to back

The bezel: A snowstorm, dry looking and not nice.

It is my intention to restore this in the following way.

Polish the case back. We have to be super-careful not to lose the definition of the hippocampus or the circumference of the flat.

replace the pushers and crown.

Things I am NOT going to do:

try to remove the dark patch on one o'clock
Polish the mid case.

It will be a while until I can get this to Simon, but when he does it I will post an update.
 
Posts
20,146
Likes
46,801
It appears to be quite a wearable watch at the right price.
 
Posts
5,258
Likes
23,997
It appears to be quite a wearable watch at the right price.

absolutely. In fact my favourite kind as I can wear it around tough environments and not worry about the case and bezel
 
Posts
914
Likes
1,757
Very kind of you to help the owner to come to a satisfactory deal.
I wouldn`t mind that ding or the spot on the one o`clock marker, good signs of living, but the case side and bevel are not to my liking.
 
Posts
6,609
Likes
21,381
These assessments are always enjoyable and you’re kind to be so transparent with your evaluative process.
 
Posts
5,258
Likes
23,997
For comparisons here is one sold recently for comparison on OF for CHF7500

Everything about this one is better I think - maybe the dial on mine is more attractive to me, but an infinitesimal and arbitrary judgement.

Certainly I can safely say the value is much higher, with the bezel being so much better and the case being clean.

Which is what this hobby is all about. I must say this one deservedly sold quickly - with the right combination of attraction price and condition.



dsc_4261-jpeg.1723401
 
Posts
664
Likes
1,383
Really informative as always, thanks. Would be keen to know the overall rating that you would bestow on your watch in its current state.

Also, I’m always curious about the impact of a poor DON bezel on an assessment - I have a couple of 145.022 69s, one of which has a poor DON bezel. While the bezel certainly detracts from the appearance of the watch, could it be argued that a poor DON is preferable to a very good replacement DNN? Picture below is of the 145.022 in question (I think it looks better in person).
 
Posts
20,146
Likes
46,801
If you have a GOOD watch with a POOR bezel, just start with the value of a GOOD watch and subtract the difference in value of the bezel. There is an active market for loose bezels, so that's an easy adjustment to make.
 
Posts
664
Likes
1,383
If you have a GOOD watch with a POOR bezel, just start with the value of a GOOD watch and subtract the difference in value of the bezel. There is an active market for loose bezels, so that's an easy adjustment to make.
Thanks Dan, I can definitely see the logic in that approach - also when it comes to vintage watches it highlights the role of donor watches in improving the desirability of a watch by replacing tired parts.
 
Posts
20,146
Likes
46,801
I think you always need to be flexible and make adjustments to any price guide. In this case, the bezel is probably the easiest adjustment to make because bezels are frequently sold loose. Other things are much harder, e.g. how much to deduct for a polished case or minor lume loss.
 
Posts
88
Likes
775
Great write up as usual. Learned a lot from watching your Youtube videos this week. Thanks for sharing your knowledge!
 
Posts
1,430
Likes
2,936
For comparison again... here's a transitional that I picked up in auction a few years ago that I considered in excellent condition with box and papers. Probably has dropped in value, but, you just don't find many time capsules these days.
 
Posts
4,929
Likes
17,205
For comparison again... here's a transitional that I picked up in auction a few years ago that I considered in excellent condition with box and papers. Probably has dropped in value, but, you just don't find many time capsules these days.

Don't get better than yours.

Hard to capture the dark dial but here's my recent capture.

 
Posts
1,430
Likes
2,936
Don't get better than yours.

Hard to capture the dark dial but here's my recent capture.

It’s a beauty, and you perfectly captured a gorgeous dial and patina. Enjoy and wear it well.
 
Posts
4,929
Likes
17,205
It’s a beauty, and you perfectly captured a gorgeous dial and patina...

I don't know, I think they look better in person. 😁
 
Posts
86
Likes
85
Thank you for this write up and wonderful photos. It's interesting that the case does not look so bad in the photos, but is actually much worse in person. If it were not for that one side-angle photo you posted that shows the rounding and loss of definition on the inner lugs, I would think it had been polished, but not terrible overall. Mental note made for future purchases.
 
Posts
5,084
Likes
45,699
Thanks for the inside view of your thinking and process, looking forward to your future report(s)!
 
Posts
746
Likes
6,438
Great analysis. I completely missed the polished inner lugs. Probably because I'm so focused on the dial and bezel. Good to know for future purchases.
 
Posts
142
Likes
307
Thank you for another informative and insightful post William; always a pleasure!

I too think an average Transitional makes an above-average daily wearer. The previous owner of mine sent it to Swatch for service and it came back over polished, less lumed, and newly handed. Unfortunately, the gentleman proceeded to misplace the original parts.

Still looks quite presentable on wrist, though not as presentable as your example.