E2B
·So, after owning a 2531.80 that I've always quoted as "pre-bond" I'd like to know some details.
What I was always explicitly stated is the following:
1. the 2531.80, which is one of the two quintessential original "bond omega" watches (the actual one for the first film being the quartz ref: 2541.80) was released as an omega watch before the 1995 release of goldeneye. There was a 300m model in this exact trim before the movie - nothing special was done to make one for the them.
2. What is based on inference but is logical is that more of these were sold after the film release than before.
3. The wild rumor mill portion that I can't find a solid ref for is that the reason for the switch from the traditional bond "rolex" is that rolex refused to lock into a licensing agreement for the bond films and as a result the set designer picked an omega.
4. There is a a way to date early smp 300m's that were before this era - there are few notable differences as indicated in the post below. But the question is if there is a cut-off for this and if it aligns with a change in production numbers.
As an owner of an early SMP 300m, I'd love to start a discussion on these details to gain some understanding on these early 300m's. Let me know!
Useful links I've found:
- Interesting thread with a 49m serial with cal 1120 and a 54M serial with 1109 sold at the end of 93. https://omegaforums.net/threads/1109-vs-1120.70360/
- More details and pics of some of these early special parts: https://omegaforums.net/threads/seamaster-300-bond-ref-2531-80-first-batch.91127/
Edited: to clean up - see post #3 for more details.
What I was always explicitly stated is the following:
1. the 2531.80, which is one of the two quintessential original "bond omega" watches (the actual one for the first film being the quartz ref: 2541.80) was released as an omega watch before the 1995 release of goldeneye. There was a 300m model in this exact trim before the movie - nothing special was done to make one for the them.
2. What is based on inference but is logical is that more of these were sold after the film release than before.
3. The wild rumor mill portion that I can't find a solid ref for is that the reason for the switch from the traditional bond "rolex" is that rolex refused to lock into a licensing agreement for the bond films and as a result the set designer picked an omega.
4. There is a a way to date early smp 300m's that were before this era - there are few notable differences as indicated in the post below. But the question is if there is a cut-off for this and if it aligns with a change in production numbers.
As an owner of an early SMP 300m, I'd love to start a discussion on these details to gain some understanding on these early 300m's. Let me know!
Useful links I've found:
- Interesting thread with a 49m serial with cal 1120 and a 54M serial with 1109 sold at the end of 93. https://omegaforums.net/threads/1109-vs-1120.70360/
- More details and pics of some of these early special parts: https://omegaforums.net/threads/seamaster-300-bond-ref-2531-80-first-batch.91127/
Edited: to clean up - see post #3 for more details.
Edited: