A bone to pick with Christie's...

Posts
8,246
Likes
29,135
Christie's has an auction coming up, and included is the Patek described (and linked to) below, with a rather eye-watering estimate. What rubs me the wrong way, though, is that they don't even include an image of the movement!

Yes, of course they will presumably send one if you ask, but FFS, if they think it's worth at least a half a million CHF, surely they could show the frigigin' movement. 馃ぁ



https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-6507204?ldp_breadcrumb=back
 
Posts
16,305
Likes
45,025
They had the back off too. Seems a rather glaring omission. But if you are paying half million for a watch you don鈥檛 need a movement, nor do you really care about time鈥he meetings don鈥檛 start without you.
 
Posts
24,798
Likes
55,079
I suspect that with people keeping records and tracking sales to identify frankens, auction houses would like to minimize the information they put into the public domain.
 
Posts
2,465
Likes
7,071
These high-end auction sites are terrible when describing their lots. Few pictures, and those that are provided don't show the real condition of the watch (look at the picture below: it looks like a rendering than a real watch)*. Poor and vague descriptions of condition. For this they want 26% premium from the buyer!?!?!?
eBay is a better market than these places.



* not saying it is a rendering, but a real watch doesn't look like this.
 
Posts
16,305
Likes
45,025
Let鈥檚 not forget the indirect Amazon $19.95 soft-tent lighting that has become a thing (think eBay store). The white on white on white bouncing around shows you nothing of value and can hide many sins.

I remember when the big auction house catalogues were the gold standard for beautiful documentary photography.
 
Posts
7,057
Likes
13,017
Auction houses often have a good idea what high-end bidders will bid for certain pieces. Just look at the 2017 auction item that went $450,312,500 !