Seeing that profound of a spatial gap in the Railmaster, and SMP 300 pictured above, I'm curious why Omega chose an 8800 movement range instead of the 8900 for those collections?
My 8900 Globemaster's exterior dimensions are under 13mm in height, and at 39mm in width. Diminutive compared to the current-gen 42mm Seamaster 300M. Granted, the SMP has increased water resistance.
If only only we could choose between movements when buying a watch while keeping the exterior design, akin to picking between powertrain options on a car
I'd favor the 8900, with its twin-barrel power reserve, and most importantly, its
silent rotor.
Click to expand...