70s' style - a good example though?

Posts
7
Likes
1
Hey All,

If taken many people's advice and picked the model/style that I like and looked for what I believe is a good example. I've come to realise that the only way for me to get something that's the right size (35mm+, solid gold and good condition) is to pay through the nose at a dealer. I may sound impatient, but due my upcoming wedding, time is short!
This constellation fits all of my criteria, and I love it's 70s' style, but is it a top class pick, or a can you guys spot something that would put you off? (apart from the dealer price).
Any experienced views will be appreciated.

 
Posts
680
Likes
1,206
Personally, if spending that kind of sum on a solid gold Omega I would consider this from Dsio, for similar money....https://omegaforums.net/threads/14k-solid-gold-omega-seamaster-deluxe-pie-pan-oj-2849-urgent-sale-make-me-an-offer.178460/
 
Posts
1,800
Likes
3,682
Looks like ref 168.019. The photos suggest some wear on the bezel- but some of the dark sections may be due to light angle. The case is lightly refinished/rebrushed and edges are soft- which is common with 18k gold. I would say it is fair + example- I think it is overpriced by about 1000 pounds- if you are in a rush and love it and its serviced with documentation that helps- but I doubt you would come close to recouping this price if you wish to sell it down the line.

the 169.029 with the fluted bezel is more attractive IMO look at the C Case Constellation thread here to see examples
https://omegaforums.net/threads/the-c-cased-constellation-thread.72308/

edit: the OM on the dial indicates solid gold dial which adds some extra value
Edited:
 
Posts
20,545
Likes
47,364
This may sound harsh, but I see it as a mediocre example of a less desirable reference (day-date C-case). I get that you see it as a fun and quirky 70s watch, but it's not something to spend serious money on, IMO. I don't know the asking price, but from the comments above, I'm sensing it's a big number. If you want a c-case, buy a gold-capped or SS example, so if you get tired of the dated look, you won't take such a huge loss on resale. Save the big money for something classic and desirable.

If you're looking for a larger gold vintage watch, take a look at IWC. Omega isn't the best brand if you're looking for larger dress watches; there are a few larger references, but they are rare.

Alternatively, there are some vintage re-issues that would be a good option for you, although they are probably more expensive.
Edited:
 
Posts
11,430
Likes
20,002
I’d go further than saying the case has been lightly refinished, it’s been heavily refinished to the point where the facets ok the side of the case have been completely lost. Unless very cheap, ie around the value of the gold, I’d pass.
 
Posts
5,502
Likes
8,544
The C case is of course famously a 60s designed watch and splits the crowd in terms of desirability - even more so the day-date.

However, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and one of the high points of the C case design is the sharp mirror-finish facet running around the edge of the C on the case.

This watch is missing that essential facet and, whilst still a handsome enough deluxe version, with the gold dial, certainly shouldn’t be priced at a premium.
Plus the brushing on the case is not right.
At £3,500 I’d say it nearer £1500 overpriced ( but rents in London are expensive)
Edited:
 
Posts
1,080
Likes
534
In the 70s, an aficionado purchased a rolex day date and a connaisseur purchased an omega constellation calendar day.