I've used them on 168.005/167.005 and 14381/14393 Constellations. They look especially good on the latter, IMO.
Interestingly, the lug width on my 14381 is under 18mm, and I don't know if I want to file down the endlinks. I'll ponder that a bit.
14381/14393 Constellations. They look especially good on the latter, IMO.
Funny, same here for my two 14381s and I figured it might have been just a coincidence. However, if you make the endlinks fit, they do sit just great:
I haven’t - never done that. But I’m not surprised there are small differences between different bracelets of the same reference. Also, have you measured the actual width of the lugs on your watch? Might be bent slightly out of shape.
Just to revisit this question, I have a 1035/30 that originally came on a SM600 (136.011). This came from the original owner, the watch originally came with this bracelet and it fit very well.
I assumed the 630’s would also fit but didn’t have a pair to compare to until now. As you would expect (E.g. with the No.6 vs 506 Endlinks) the 630’s appear to be a straight continuation of the 30’s and although it’s not listed on the bracelet charts, I’m confident both the 30’s and the 630’s will fit SM600 refs 135.011 and 136.011