- Posts
- 91
- Likes
- 317
N NyCSnEaK
This is by far the best size and bracelet, I’ve experienced on any Speedmaster. This reissue has stopped me from getting a Daytona. I really enjoy looking at this watch.
C creibDecided a 60th will be my next watch, question about the 2 versions.. What what you recommend, with or without the "trilogy ###" on the dial?
That’s a matter of personal preference! Mine goes without that trilogy being printed on the dial. It makes dial cluttered! But that’s me. You have to choose by yourself.
C creibDecided a 60th will be my next watch, question about the 2 versions.. What what you recommend, with or without the "trilogy ###" on the dial?
C creibDecided a 60th will be my next watch, question about the 2 versions.. What what you recommend, with or without the "trilogy ###" on the dial?
i have one en route, full provenance. i paid an amount i'm comfortable with because both fortunately (and unfortunately) the value of this watch has dropped quite drastically since 2017. I wonder why that is - omega's legacy product dilution strategy aside, I would've imagine a limited run of the faithfully recreated CK2915, aka the speedmaster that started it all would've gone up in value or held its value at the very least.
i'm not thinking resale, as I intend to keep this watch in my collection for a long time, but im a little dumbfounded as to why this is the case. Is it the unpopular fake patina? The larger than life clasp?
People probably see the Apollo 11 and Apollo 13 50th anniversary pieces as more "investable." They also have the new 3861, and Apollo program clout. The trilogy Speedmaster is a nice piece, but it will mostly appeal only to collectors interested in the story and origins of the Speedmaster.
i have one en route, full provenance. i paid an amount i'm comfortable with because both fortunately (and unfortunately) the value of this watch has dropped quite drastically since 2017. I wonder why that is - omega's legacy product dilution strategy aside, I would've imagine a limited run of the faithfully recreated CK2915, aka the speedmaster that started it all would've gone up in value or held its value at the very least.
i'm not thinking resale, as I intend to keep this watch in my collection for a long time, but im a little dumbfounded as to why this is the case. Is it the unpopular fake patina? The larger than life clasp?
i have one en route, full provenance. i paid an amount i'm comfortable with because both fortunately (and unfortunately) the value of this watch has dropped quite drastically since 2017. I wonder why that is - omega's legacy product dilution strategy aside, I would've imagine a limited run of the faithfully recreated CK2915, aka the speedmaster that started it all would've gone up in value or held its value at the very least.
i'm not thinking resale, as I intend to keep this watch in my collection for a long time, but im a little dumbfounded as to why this is the case. Is it the unpopular fake patina? The larger than life clasp?