- Posts
- 2
- Likes
- 0
59684503 omega seamaster aqua terra
- Posts
- 3,172
- Likes
- 8,337
blufinz52
··Hears dead people, not watch rotors.
- Posts
- 337
- Likes
- 397
Lbreak
·the most accurate way to get this info is to order an Extract of Archive from Omega. It does cost quite a bit for a piece of paper though.
- Posts
- 2
- Likes
- 0
hildiw
·Hi Bought this second hand and was told it was 2006.i don't disbelieve the seller but am looking to clarify year of manufacture or any history on this. No pictogram cards are with watch. Any help would be much appreciated
Thanks ever so much
- Posts
- 5,298
- Likes
- 24,501
- Posts
- 9,171
- Likes
- 48,417
gbesq
·Are you sure that this watch is legitimate? The back of the bracelet on your Omega looks very different than mine. My looks like this:
Do you know what the model number is for the watch?
Do you know what the model number is for the watch?
Edited:
- Posts
- 2
- Likes
- 0
hildiw
·Are you sure that this watch is legitimate? The back of the bracelet on your Omega looks very different than mine. My looks like this:
Do you know what the model number is for the watch?
- Posts
- 9,171
- Likes
- 48,417
gbesq
·I’m skeptical with those photos. Ask the seller for the MODEL number, not just the serial. For example, on my Aqua Terra the model number is 231.10.39.21.03.001. The seller should be able to give you a model number. Once you have the model number, you can then search the model and see what shows up. Based on those photos, I'm inclined to think that the watch is not legitimate. A real Omega Aqua Terra is much more detailed. Here's an example of mine:
- Posts
- 28,053
- Likes
- 71,632
Archer
··Omega Qualified WatchmakerHmmm....something not adding up...
- Posts
- 2,496
- Likes
- 2,717
texasmade
·Are you sure that this watch is legitimate? The back of the bracelet on your Omega looks very different than mine. My looks like this:
Do you know what the model number is for the watch?
- Posts
- 332
- Likes
- 322
ErichKeane
·H hildiwForgot to take a picture of the catch but photo of the serial and face below. Any insights greatly appreciated before I buy it!
I'm MUCH more sure that the bracelet on that is not authentic though. The endlink fitup is terrible, the '889' imprint doesn't look like any of the Omegas I've seen, and I can't seem to find ANYTHING about an 889 bracelet endlink.
I wouldn't buy that unless I was REALLY sure. I'd suggest at minimum pulling the case back to look at the movement. I wouldn't be surprised to see a Seiko knock-off movement in that.
- Posts
- 247
- Likes
- 710
Kraal90
·That is at best a franken Quartz movement AT from the 1st generation.
- Posts
- 3,186
- Likes
- 6,361
ErichPryde
·Just to add: Markers and hands look like they were polished with a fairly gritty steel wool. The case back is all jacked, these fake case backs always have what look like nicks and gouges that have been polished out- my guess is it's just very cheap casting process.
Maybe the point is to make it look like it's "worn," but man. No good.
Maybe the point is to make it look like it's "worn," but man. No good.
- Posts
- 131
- Likes
- 152
Mute
·There's way too much that doesn't look right on this watch. Maybe it's just the quality of the photo, but does it look like there's no lume material on the minutes hand?
Similar threads
- Posts
- 1
- Views
- 448
- Posts
- 11
- Views
- 3K
- Posts
- 4
- Views
- 2K
- Posts
- 8
- Views
- 3K
- Posts
- 5
- Views
- 3K
