55 year old watch accuracy ok? 752 166.5032

Posts
58
Likes
4
Not sure what to expect but does this seem reasonable?
Also not sure when it was last serviced which might help?
Any advice appreciated

 
Posts
21,039
Likes
48,063
I don't think you can expect much better for an unserviced watch. The lift angle should be 49˚, IIRC, which will change the amplitude a bit.
 
Posts
143
Likes
286
@uk_onega I think 12 s/day is all the way ok, nobody needs more accuracy in dayly life.

I just discovered the smartphone app to get the accuracy of my watches.
It was very surprising, as a few watches show really bad figures of 40 to 60 s/day, but these 60 years old cal 561/4 Omegas are surprisingly good, more acuracy than I need for dayly use. They were once cleaned by my local watchmaker but not specially adjusted.
Konrad
Edited:
 
Posts
143
Likes
286
And two underperformers both with cal 1001. (I have other cal 1001 that perform well.)
All watches lie for long unused in the drawer.
But my watchmaker will help to get better results...
Edited:
 
Posts
58
Likes
4
From my research it shows that it probably doesn't need a service then 😀
 
Posts
683
Likes
2,567
Not sure what to expect but does this seem reasonable?
Also not sure when it was last serviced which might help?
Any advice appreciated

Loooks reasonable as Dan mentioned. If you fix the lift angle to 49, you wil get around 250, which would still be reasonable based on my non-expert observations.
 
Posts
21,039
Likes
48,063
From my research it shows that it probably doesn't need a service then 😀
IMO, timekeeping is not a good way to determine whether the watch needs a service. If the lubrication has dried up, the watch may still keep decent time, but friction between moving parts will gradually damage the movement as it runs. Moreover, the timekeeping provides no information about other aspects of the movement, e.g. the auto-winding. If you plan to only use the watch on rare occasions, it may not be worth it to you to pay for a service. But if you plan to use it regularly, you might want to have it inspected by a watchmaker. If it was recently serviced, the watchmaker should be able to tell.
 
Posts
58
Likes
4
IMO, timekeeping is not a good way to determine whether the watch needs a service. If the lubrication has dried up, the watch may still keep decent time, but friction between moving parts will gradually damage the movement as it runs. Moreover, the timekeeping provides no information about other aspects of the movement, e.g. the auto-winding. If you plan to only use the watch on rare occasions, it may not be worth it to you to pay for a service. But if you plan to use it regularly, you might want to have it inspected by a watchmaker. If it was recently serviced, the watchmaker should be able to tell.
Thanks, here's some photos of the movement. Not sure if you could tell from these?

 
Posts
21,039
Likes
48,063
Nope, I can't tell. Please re-read my previous post.
 
Posts
58
Likes
4
You are missing a case back gasket.
Thanks, yes it came off with the watch back