Forums Latest Members
  1. patmoon89 Apr 21, 2016

    Posts
    83
    Likes
    108
    Still on the hunt for an as close to NOS 3572.50 but in the interim I've been running across a few 3592.50s.

    I think I know the main differences between them...gilt vs rhodium, tritium vs not but I'm not quite sure what people lean towards the 3572.50 more than the 3592.50. Any thoughts?

    I've been eyeing some of the "numbered" 3592.50s. I guess a 1000 were made for Germany and another for America. Then the rest of the batch weren't numbered at all.

    Should I grab the 3592.50 over the 3572.50? Long term value isn't too much of a concern...just wondering if I'm missing something. Thanks!
     
    fskywalker and Epsteel like this.
  2. lando Apr 21, 2016

    Posts
    649
    Likes
    1,179
    I prefer the 3592.50 myself. This is my daily wearer. I like it a lot! This one is engraved 345.0808 and not 3592.50:

    700_2570.jpg caseback+movement_small_(3101)_hidden_sn.jpg
     
    pianomankd, RMA, fskywalker and 2 others like this.
  3. abrod520 Apr 21, 2016

    Posts
    11,262
    Likes
    35,476
    The biggest difference IMO is that the 3592 is tritium, while the 3572 is luminova (mostly; some early 3572s may have tritium dials). The tritium lume generally ages to a more pleasing patina, and thus may appreciate in value better than a 3572. But your preferences are your own, and either watch is a great way to go, so it may just come down to price.
     
    fskywalker likes this.
  4. davy26 Limited comebackability is his main concern. Apr 21, 2016

    Posts
    833
    Likes
    1,768
    Agree that both are nice, but I think if you can have tritium that's got to be better for longer term improved aesthetics.
     
    fskywalker and Taddyangle like this.
  5. Taddyangle Convicted Invicta Wearer Apr 21, 2016

    Posts
    4,820
    Likes
    31,399
    Here is mine, it is a 3572.50 and with the tritium. As @abrod520 mentioned, early ones had tritium, but most are luminova. Certainly I prefer the former, but the good thing with speedys is you have so many options.

    upload_2016-4-21_10-40-44.png
     
    RMA, fskywalker, George.A and 3 others like this.
  6. sky21 Apr 21, 2016

    Posts
    1,187
    Likes
    1,854
    Take a look at this 3592.50 posted here in the sales forum, you probably won't find a nicer one.

    https://omegaforums.net/threads/199...ollo-xi-sapphire-case-back-3592-50-b-p.38845/
     
  7. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Apr 21, 2016

    Posts
    17,107
    Likes
    25,353
    If by options you mean subtle differences only noticeable to 1 in a million people on a watch that has not really changed at all since 1963. ;)
     
  8. Taddyangle Convicted Invicta Wearer Apr 21, 2016

    Posts
    4,820
    Likes
    31,399
    To us here they are major and noticeable. And I think 1 in 100 million :). Granted this message board is growing fast so could be 1 in 1 million soon. Huge changes in the 4 years I have been posting here.
     
    davy26 and Foo2rama like this.
  9. DLT222 Double D @ ΩF Staff Member Apr 21, 2016

    Posts
    5,175
    Likes
    4,555
    Yeah its mental to see how fast its coming on, in a good way!
     
    Taddyangle likes this.
  10. dennisthemenace Hey, he asked for it! Apr 21, 2016

    Posts
    2,828
    Likes
    4,461
    I sometimes wonder if some of the new members here actually own a watch, or are they just repeating what others have said many times before and are trying to impress us with their new found knowledge.
     
    ac106 likes this.
  11. patmoon89 Apr 21, 2016

    Posts
    83
    Likes
    108
    That would be such a senseless act. Impressing people on the forums just for the sake of it?

    Thanks for all the posts! The 3592.50 in the sales section are quite tempting. I like the patina associated with the tritium but more importantly...is it worth trading in my modern speedy? I gotta think...
     
  12. patmoon89 Apr 21, 2016

    Posts
    83
    Likes
    108
    [​IMG]
     
    RMA, fskywalker and sky21 like this.
  13. VillageIdiot Apr 21, 2016

    Posts
    112
    Likes
    76
    Personally, I don't think it matters as long as you get one with the yellow-gilded 863 movement (which typically also comes with the tritium dial). Those 3592.50s and (early) 3572.50s are basically identical except for the caseback text (and, apparently, in some cases, they are identical and indistinguishable, at least according to the "Moonwatch Only" book).
     
  14. yinzerniner Apr 22, 2016

    Posts
    1,869
    Likes
    1,394
    Another distinction b/w the 3592's and the early 3572's is the bracelet. The 3592s came with the nicely tapered 1479 bracelet, which had solid end links and smaller sized individual links, but a stamped friction clasp. The 3572s came with the 1498/1499 bracelet, which kept the nice tapered shape but had larger individual links for a more modern look, and the friction clasp was milled so it feels more solid.

    Also, 3572s were notorious parts bin specials - tritium vs superluminova dials, 863 vs 1863 movements, they were all mixed up for a bit. In general you'll find superluminova with 1863 and tritium with 863, which coincides nicely as the aged tritium will match the gilded movement while the white superluminova will match the rhodium counterpart. But all 3572s will have the lemania with the 18th jewel - I think the early 3592s will have the 17 jewel movement, which according to @Archer here shouldn't be too big of a deal but it's a difference nonetheless.
     
    fskywalker and robinhook like this.
  15. VillageIdiot Apr 22, 2016

    Posts
    112
    Likes
    76
    Yes, what yinzerniner said. :)
     
    fskywalker and SteveZ28 like this.
  16. WatchVaultNYC Apr 22, 2016

    Posts
    3,719
    Likes
    4,190
    gilt display movement matches with the tritium markers, so 3592.50!
     
    fskywalker likes this.
  17. ibis888 Apr 23, 2016

    Posts
    334
    Likes
    207
    I think the tritium patina and see through case back makes the 3592.50 my favorite 'modern' Speedmaster.

    And you can often find them in mint condition for substantially less than a new Speedmaster, even after adding in the cost of a good service.
     
    fskywalker likes this.
  18. immustard A condiment that loves to chive to thyme songs Apr 23, 2016

    Posts
    154
    Likes
    307
    I went for the 3592.50 over the 3572.50 as I like the tritium lume and the gold gilt movement, also if you can get a numbered one it's a bit more exclusive/special.
     
    fskywalker likes this.
  19. patmoon89 May 8, 2016

    Posts
    83
    Likes
    108
    So I'm in the process of finalizing a 3572.50 w/ papers in amazing condition from the forums for <3k. I was really wanting something new-ish.

    All of the excellent condition 3592.50 were >3k and would need servicing. I'm wondering now...is there any benefit to keeping the new 311.xxxxx speedy? Should I flip it and try to get a numbered 3592.50?

    Did i mess up? Maybe i should've just gotten a numbered 3592.50 and kept the new speedy? I feel like the rhodium plated speedy looks so nice, but the exclusivity/rarity of a numbered 3592.50 outweighs that?
     
    Edited May 8, 2016
    fskywalker likes this.
  20. patmoon89 May 8, 2016

    Posts
    83
    Likes
    108
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    RMA, fskywalker and robinhook like this.