2023 "Ashes" cricket Test Series England versus Australia

Posts
1,850
Likes
4,832
91 down is going to be a tough task.

Aussie’s 2-0 up me presumes…..
Fingers crossed!
 
Posts
1,555
Likes
3,651
Australia's morning and healthy first innings lead. Let's see what the rest of the day has in store.
 
Posts
1,555
Likes
3,651
Seems like when it works it's praised as brave / radical Bazball, and when it doesn't it's playing inappropriate shots for test cricket.
Commentators have to earn their money I guess. The England approach (Bazball) is work in progress as far as I am concerned and is definitely not the finished article. There will probably me as many success as failures and It may ultimately end in abject failure but its interesting and exciting to watch in the mean time.
 
Posts
16,675
Likes
47,182
😗
Started at 00:30 at work. Watched the Aussies finish their innings. Had a job to do and came back and England 4-35

Aussies in the driver's seat 😉
 
Posts
16,675
Likes
47,182
What the 🤬....Did they want Starc to put the ball in he's pocket before he saved himself from face planting...

Brilliant catch in my book and should have been out...
 
Posts
590
Likes
1,535
No way Starc caught that cleanly. Good decision from 3rd Umpire, and the correct one. Starc was taking the piss claiming it, imo.
 
Posts
1,555
Likes
3,651
What the 🤬....Did they want Starc to put the ball in he's pocket before he saved himself from face planting...

Brilliant catch in my book and should have been out...
No doubt I wouldn't be happy if it was the other way around but when I read the relevant law it seems pretty clear that the ball was grounded before Starc had control of his own movement.
I'm not expecting to affect the result if I'm honest. Stokes and Bairstow might make Aus nervous but Aus to win at a canter I think.
 
Posts
29,573
Likes
35,557
😗
Started at 00:30 at work. Watched the Aussies finish their innings. Had a job to do and came back and England 4-35

Aussies in the driver's seat 😉
Man I wish I worked for the government too lol
 
Posts
606
Likes
909
Well that Bairstow dismissal was a bit, er, unconventional / cheeky / brilliant / unsportsmanlike (delete as appropriate). Seems to have made this Lords crowd very vocal and un-Lords like.

Strangely looks like it might have wound up Broad and Stokes - could be a turning point to swing the match back in England's favour? Stokes' over to take him to a century was incredible. Fascinating match
 
Posts
274
Likes
459
After the Starc ‘drop’ I thought it was good to see the rules continue to be followed to the letter 😉

Stokes is unbelievable when he is firing.
 
Posts
606
Likes
909
After the Starc ‘drop’ I thought it was good to see the rules continue to be followed to the letter 😉

Stokes is unbelievable when he is firing.

Agree about the rules being followed. Difference seems to be that Duckett walked and it was the 3rd umpire who reversed it. This was the Aus team deliberately exploiting the rules to engineer a result. Both legal. One not necessarily in the spirit of the laws (depending on your POV).

Either way, it's made for an even more dramatic final day!
 
Posts
1,850
Likes
4,832
Agree about the rules being followed. Difference seems to be that Duckett walked and it was the 3rd umpire who reversed it. This was the Aus team deliberately exploiting the rules to engineer a result. Both legal. One not necessarily in the spirit of the laws (depending on your POV).

Either way, it's made for an even more dramatic final day!
Duckett came back though, and Stokes said, of the Bairstow dismissal that if the situation were reversed he have had to meditate on the Spirit of Cricket- I think that is a little hypocritical though- given he didn’t usher Duckett off…
Pleasingly the Australians didn’t complain about the Duckett reprieve
 
Posts
9,536
Likes
15,041
As a pal of mine noted today, a team that has been caught with sandpaper in their pockets as recently as 2018 might want to display a bit more moral fibre than this this Aussie shower have today. If the idea is to make the rest of the series more enticing to watch they have certainly done that but they have also incited scenes never before seen at Lords, namely confrontations in the long room and members suspended. To quote the Hollies stand at Edgbaston from the last test: "Same old Aussies always cheating" this does nothing to dispel that notion.

Australia would have won anyway as on paper and on the pitch they are the better team. Why stoop to such a questionable way to do so? Up until now it was a relatively good natured competition, I doubt it will continue so now.
 
Posts
606
Likes
909
At the end of the day there was only 40 odd runs between the teams. I do think Bairstow could have made a decent contribution to making up that deficit. Still think Australia are the better team over these 2 games but think it would've been closer without that controversial "stumping".
 
Posts
16,675
Likes
47,182
Ahh the rules 😗

Stay in your crease 😁
 
Posts
1,850
Likes
4,832
As a pal of mine noted today, a team that has been caught with sandpaper in their pockets as recently as 2018 might want to display a bit more moral fibre than this this Aussie shower have today. If the idea is to make the rest of the series more enticing to watch they have certainly done that but they have also incited scenes never before seen at Lords, namely confrontations in the long room and members suspended. To quote the Hollies stand at Edgbaston from the last test: "Same old Aussies always cheating" this does nothing to dispel that notion.

Australia would have won anyway as on paper and on the pitch they are the better team. Why stoop to such a questionable way to do so? Up until now it was a relatively good natured competition, I doubt it will continue so now.

interesting take, given a similar scenario unfolded recently when Robinson dismissed Grandhomme in similar circumstances a year ago and Stokes ‘moral fibre, spirit of cricket’ response was to allow the dismissal.
Let’s not also forget that the MCC has apologised for the Lords members appalling behaviour and that the dismissal was legal (ridiculous but legal) in the same way Ducketts dismissal was ridiculous but legal.
That latter dismissal seemed not to invoke any fury from the English members, nor invoke any moralising from Stokes.

I’m not sure how a cheating incident a decade ago for which 2 team members were banned for a year plays out in a scenario in which no cheating occurred yesterday

As a mate said to me yesterday when posed a similar question to yours, ‘That’s mint, Murray’s mint!’
 
Posts
9,536
Likes
15,041
interesting take, given a similar scenario unfolded recently when Robinson dismissed Grandhomme in similar circumstances a year ago and Stokes ‘moral fibre, spirit of cricket’ response was to allow the dismissal.
Let’s not also forget that the MCC has apologised for the Lords members appalling behaviour and that the dismissal was legal (ridiculous but legal) in the same way Ducketts dismissal was ridiculous but legal.I
That latter dismissal seemed not to invoke any fury from the English members, nor invoke any moralising from Stokes.

I’m not sure how a cheating incident a decade ago for which 2 team members were banned for a year plays out in a scenario in which no cheating occurred yesterday

As a mate said to me yesterday when posed a similar question to yours, ‘That’s mint, Murray’s mint!’

The 2 banned members from Sandpapergate were on the pitch today as you may or may not know. Apropos of nothing, does the word decade mean something else in Aus? is it like the US gallon, smaller than that accepted in the old country? Just checking! 😉