1990s SeaMaster Lume backing Degradation

Posts
12
Likes
1
Hey new to the forum. Just wondering if the lume on this 1999 SeaMaster looks as it should? The lume backing at 12 looks a bit degraded in terms of being uneven. No issues with how it works but a few particles seem to have come off. Looking at other photos online it doesn’t seem that unusual but thought I’d check here. Thanks
Edited:
 
Posts
12,058
Likes
20,947
Yeah they often go like that, especially from the 90’s which can be approaching 30 years old
 
Posts
12
Likes
1
Yeah they often go like that, especially from the 90’s which can be approaching 30 years old

thanks David, is it the glue breaking down over time or something? They seem to have almost sunken into the wave pattern
 
Posts
9,957
Likes
15,636
I can't see any issue there at all personally, it looks fine to me, but dials from this era can develop issues if there has been a slight water ingress issue at some point ie fogging or similar. SL lume only really degrades due to outside influnences, if left alone it is very stable indeed. The lume backing as you call it is just a white paint plot, the lume is just the green stripe and that looks pristine, it probably looked exactly like that on day one.

I thought that model had gone before the SL lume came along in 1997 but I could be mistaken as I am not basing it on anything concrete. Is that actually a 2532.80 or is it another model with a dial or bezel swap? That configuration certainly didn't make it into the 2000s. It was replaced by the 2255.80 electric blue model I think.
Edited:
 
Posts
12
Likes
1
I can't see any issue there at all personally, it looks fine to me, but dials from this era can develop issues if there has been a slight water ingress issue at some point ie fogging or similar. SL lume only really degrades due to outside influnences, if left alone it is very stable indeed. The lume backing as you call it is just a white paint plot, the lume is just the green stripe and that looks pristine, it probably looked exactly like that on day one.

I thought that model had gone before the SL lume came along in 1997. Is that actually a 2532.80 or is it another model with a dial or bezel swap? That configuration certainly didn't make it into the 2000s
 
Posts
9,957
Likes
15,636
Thanks very much Padders. It doesn’t really bother me but as I only just got it was wondering if there was an issue. Bought from a reputable source and checked with a local shop who said it was “definitely” authentic but thought I’d ask. Thanks again

Oh it's probably fine, I am just curious. If you had the cards it would be easy to check the exact PIC code but otherwise it's not as easy as all you have to go on is the case number. I don't see anything that suggests it isn't all 100% legit, just it seems a bit late for that config.

There are other 2532s on C24 with SL dials so it is likely a legit combo, maybe it ran on later than I thought.
 
Posts
12
Likes
1
I can't see any issue there at all personally, it looks fine to me, but dials from this era can develop issues if there has been a slight water ingress issue at some point ie fogging or similar. SL lume only really degrades due to outside influnences, if left alone it is very stable indeed. The lume backing as you call it is just a white paint plot, the lume is just the green stripe and that looks pristine, it probably looked exactly like that on day one.

I thought that model had gone before the SL lume came along in 1997 but I could be mistaken as I am not basing it on anything concrete. Is that actually a 2532.80 or is it another model with a dial or bezel swap? That configuration certainly didn't make it into the 2000s. It was replaced by the 2255.80 electric blue model I think.

Thanks very much Padders. It doesn’t really bother me but as I only just got it was wondering if there was an issue. Bought from a reputable source and checked with a local shop who said it was “definitely” authentic but thought I’d ask.

it’s a 60s serial number so 1999. It’s meant to be a 2532.80 but haven’t opened it up
 
Posts
12
Likes
1
Oh it's probably fine, I am just curious. If you had the cards it would be easy to check the exact PIC code but otherwise it's not as easy as all you have to go on is the case number. I don't see anything that suggests it isn't all 100% legit, just it seems a bit late for that config.

Thanks, here are the papers, came with these and swing tag
 
Posts
9,957
Likes
15,636
Thanks very much Padders. It doesn’t really bother me but as I only just got it was wondering if there was an issue. Bought from a reputable source and checked with a local shop who said it was “definitely” authentic but thought I’d ask.

it’s a 60s serial number so 1999. It’s meant to be a 2532.80 but haven’t opened it up

Great, that shows it was indeed a legit 2532.80. The serial numbers don't work quite as neatly as that. A 60s serial can mean anywhere from around 1997 to 2000 or so on an auto SMP and it varies between models, the quartz models at the same time are in the high 50s for instance, and speedmasters in the 77m range.
 
Posts
12
Likes
1
Great, that shows it was indeed a legit 2532.80. The serial numbers don't work quite as neatly as that. A 60s serial can mean anywhere from around 1997 to 2000 or so on an auto SMP and it varies between models, the quartz models at the same time are in the high 50s for instance, and speedmasters in the 77m range.
Ah thanks that’s great to know! Really appreciate all your help. Thanks very much
 
Posts
12
Likes
1
Great, that shows it was indeed a legit 2532.80. The serial numbers don't work quite as neatly as that. A 60s serial can mean anywhere from around 1997 to 2000 or so on an auto SMP and it varies between models, the quartz models at the same time are in the high 50s for instance, and speedmasters in the 77m range.

hey had a watchmaker open it up and take photos when doing a pressure test, I didn’t hear anything back from then to say there was an issue but assuming the movement looks authentic? Serial number matches. Thanks very much
 
Posts
9,957
Likes
15,636
Looks fine, just like every other 1120.