1948 Seamaster - What's it worth?

Posts
8
Likes
13
Hello all,

I recently purchased this Omega Seamaster, and the former owner reached out, expressing a desire to buy it back.

I'm reluctant to sell it back because I really like the watch, but some other factors have come into play, and I'm considering it.

I told the owner that I might consider selling it back at the market price. However, after some online research, I couldn't find a price for it. So, I'm counting on the OF (Omega Forums) members for a ballpark valuation on this.

The serial number places the watch as being made in 1948, if I'm not mistaken. It has a solid 18kt gold case, "beefy" lugs, a 36mm width, and the 342 calibre movement is running and keeping time nicely (only -12 seconds per day). Although a service and a new gasket are recommended.



Thank you very much!
Edited:
 
Posts
8,617
Likes
71,225
My personal view, and I may or may not be in a minority, is that the right thing to do would be to offer it back to the seller for the price you paid.

It would be reasonable to recoup any postage charges on both the original sale and the resale and, if whilst it’s been in your ownership, any charges you incurred having it serviced or repaired.

Of course, if you decide to keep it because you like it, that’s also, arguably, reasonable.
 
Posts
5,521
Likes
9,436
Don't sell it back, but as a goodwill gesture you could offer to meet him somewhere i the middle between the purchase price and the 'market value'. How much did you pay them for it?
 
Posts
15,461
Likes
45,793
There’s lots of similar watches currently listed for sale on line. Perhaps suggest he might consider the prices asked for these similar watches. Then, if he still wants your watch more than anything he sees on line, he will be better able to make a reasonable offer for yours. Then, counter with a higher price that you’re comfortable with.
 
Posts
4,336
Likes
10,272
If it's a good friend or family member = sell it back
If you paid $100 = Don't sell it back 😉
 
Posts
3,401
Likes
13,196
12.7m serial and the word Seamaster on the dial point to early 50s, not 1948, but that’s not really relevant for pricing. Basically I agree with @Spruce here.
 
Posts
8
Likes
13
Thank you all for the input and enlightment.

After reading some of your replies, i quickly came to a conclusion and reached an agreement with the other person.

Respecting the other party's request, I will delete the photographs of the movement and caseback.
 
Posts
24,228
Likes
53,955
I don't know the story behind this, but I don't think you have any ethical responsibility to give a former owner a bargain price. If someone sells a watch and wants to buy it back later, market price is fair, but only if you want to sell it. Frankly, he might have to pay more than market price to pry it out of your hands, and that's fair too.

There are many watches I've sold that I regret selling, but it would be absurd for me to ask the owners to sell them back to me at their cost, if the price has risen in the meantime.

Incidentally, although the photos have been removed, the OP posted a gold 2657, which is a "jumbo" bumper Seamaster reference. I only got a quick look, but the dial looked nice overall, with some signs of age. It's quite a desirable watch.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,523
Likes
1,678
If this is my watch and unless the other party is a friend/family member, I won't sell it back to the seller. This is a desirable model and (assuming) you got it at an okay price, so what's the point of doing so, mate?
 
Posts
1,561
Likes
3,670
I think all the options you have been given above are reasonable and if you followed any of then there could be no real complaints from the original seller. However its your own conscience you have to live with so you should do whatever feels comfortable and right to yourself.
 
Posts
7,899
Likes
35,847
I'm with @Dan S here, he has approached you to buy it back not the other way around, so therefore if it was me I'd let him do the research and make me an offer. If it's a fair offer I'd consider it, otherwise....
 
Posts
3,401
Likes
13,196
Gotta revise my statement a little, my tired mind transformed “former owner” to “friend” or something along those lines yesterday night. That would make a big difference to me. If the person is very close to me and there hasn’t been too much time before the first transaction (not a decade) I’d be ok - or I’d insist - on the same amount, provided I’m interested in returning it.
If it’s a watch I bought from a random seller on eBay a few years back not so much.