168.029 Constellation - Re-dial?

Posts
295
Likes
620
I just saw (on Google images) 2 other examples that have the straight n, but most are the curved n. I have the date only reference from 1970, ref. 168.017, that has the curved n. The lume dots on the indices seem to have been removed on your example.
 
Posts
63
Likes
98
Thank you for your replys so far.

Also interesting this gold-caped model:



Any red flags here? Priced at 1670 GBP on ebay.
 
Posts
3,266
Likes
23,413
Later "transitional" examples of the caliber 751 C-cases introduced the new "Constellation" script lettering with a straight "n" as opposed to the previous curly "n". So that’s correct for a 70s 168.019/029.
 
Posts
63
Likes
98
Thank you very much @Aroxx

Any other thoughts about the condition of the two examples shown?
 
Posts
2,677
Likes
3,151
This is actually a better dial in terms of design, there is an improvement on the sides, a ring area

With this said, on the close up photo, that star looks like it might be dislodged
 
Posts
185
Likes
170
The dial appears original to me. When the serifs show up that crisply at high magnification it is diagnostic of an original dial. That being said, I think the price may be a bit high for that example. Of course, the value is whatever anyone is willing to pay for it.
 
Posts
63
Likes
98
The dial appears original to me. When the serifs show up that crisply at high magnification it is diagnostic of an original dial. That being said, I think the price may be a bit high for that example. Of course, the value is whatever anyone is willing to pay for it.

Thanks. Are you talking about the silver or gold dial?

Edit: sorry, my mistake, understood now
 
Posts
185
Likes
170
Thanks. Are you talking about the silver or gold dial?

The silver. I’m looking on my phone though, and I can’t really make it out the gold dial as well.
 
Posts
63
Likes
98
Any other thoughts or even red flags about the golden version?
 
Posts
13,489
Likes
31,801
Any other thoughts or even red flags about the golden version?

Laughable price, over polished case, nasty looking movement, very pitted case back.
 
Posts
63
Likes
98
Thank you so much. In this case, the silver dialed should be prefered, right? not considering the price, though.
 
Posts
2,583
Likes
3,869
With this said, on the close up photo, that star looks like it might be dislodged
It looks like the star is facet side down. Like the facets are keeping slight above the dial.

Shouldn’t the facets side be like this?
 
Posts
2,677
Likes
3,151
I'm under the assumption that all stars are symmetrical, you can turn them 72 degrees and not notice any change, that facets you see are from the photo shadows - but from the photo it looks elevated, maybe possibly mis-glued in place - that part is worrisome

Actually a second look, the shadow of the star appearing under the star, kinda proves the star isn't inserted, so it's best a pass, mainly out of fear that there is glue on the dial
 
Posts
3,266
Likes
23,413
It looks like the star is facet side down. Like the facets are keeping slight above the dial.

Shouldn’t the facets side be like this?
Agreed. It looks like the star was glued on upside down. It’s a shame as the rest of it looks quite nice.
 
Posts
35,643
Likes
39,895
These are watches I really prefer to buy at auction just because they tend to have very few bidders which results in quite low prices. I’ve bought a few for friends for literal peanuts as a result of that.