168.005 pie-pan dial with upside down star

Posts
1,130
Likes
2,218
Did any fellows see any other example? This dial is 100% original untouched.

 
Posts
13,310
Likes
18,424
This dial is 100% original untouched.
You sure about that?

Original, possibly. Untouched? Not likely.

A skilled jeweler should be able to fix it, just as an unskilled one made it that way.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
521
Likes
789
I agree with @gatorcpa as you can see quite plainly that the applied Omega logo, applied Omega text, and the star have been worked separately from the indices.
 
Posts
365
Likes
453
This dial raises some questions. The Omega logo and the star looks blued. Why?
The font seems to be correct but - I get the feeling that the font size is to small? (tiny difference, and I checked other pieces).
Look at my comparison with my 168.005. Please note that the OPs picture has much lower resolution. (I have enhanced OP,s pic).

Note that i don´t say it´s uncorrect, other than the obvious remarks pointed out by gatorpca


 
Posts
1,325
Likes
1,870
This dial raises some questions. The Omega logo and the star looks blued. Why?
The font seems to be correct but - I get the feeling that the font size is to small? (tiny difference, and I checked other pieces).
Look at my comparison with my 168.005. Please note that the OPs picture has much lower resolution. (I have enhanced OP,s pic).

Note that i don´t say it´s uncorrect, other than the obvious remarks pointed out by gatorpca


But Are you sure the star on your watch is correct?
 
Posts
1,567
Likes
2,677
The font sizes might seem weird because the star sizes are different. If you look at the dial furniture, it's quite clear that this is the case. At first,168.005s on the internet seem to have small or large sizes, without any immediately discernible pattern. Constellation step dials and no-step dials seem to have small and large stars, so that didn't turn out anything useful. But later, I realized that the vertical spacing between the Applied Metal Logos (AML) and the Applied Brand Names (ABN) is consistently smaller on the big star dials, and larger for the small star dials. I don't know why, but the pattern seems to hold on all the google images that turn up.
 
Posts
2,251
Likes
15,687
Do you know why the star and logo are ”blued”?
 
Posts
1,130
Likes
2,218
Markers, logo, star, date window are made from solid white gold. That "blueish" color is because of natural oxidation, I can clean them to bright white gold but decided to keep their color of time.
 
Posts
6,307
Likes
9,750
Markers, logo, star, date window are made from solid white gold. That "blueish" color is because of natural oxidation, I can clean them to bright white gold but decided to keep their color of time.

IIRC the 'silver' markers on most Connies are rhodium plated rather than white gold (other than some special arrowhead markers perhaps)
This doesn't preclude tarnishing of course.
Tarnished stars have been seen before and the fact that the date window is tarnished would make sense as it is closest to the most common point of moisture ingress.

There is something sterile about the dial - it certainly is very clean but the paint work is incredibly flat.
It is a late dial as it has painted indices rather than onyx inserts. (so last quarter/end of the 60s onwards)
Did it come with a watch or separately? (i.e. could it be a service dial?)

The dial certainly didn't leave Omega with the star upside down - unless it was a quality control reject and kept by someone.

Great photos by the way
 
Posts
324
Likes
639
Do you know why the star and logo are ”blued”?

Markers, logo, star, date window are made from solid white gold. That "blueish" color is because of natural oxidation, I can clean them to bright white gold but decided to keep their color of time.

Hi hejsam,
I have similar example of an Arabic index NOS dail with index blued (see "11" index in the photo below), due to oxidation. I have to agree with No Mercy in this respect. I also left it as it is.
 
Posts
324
Likes
639
IIRC the 'silver' markers on most Connies are rhodium plated rather than white gold (other than some special arrowhead markers perhaps)

The dial certainly didn't leave Omega with the star upside down - unless it was a quality control reject and kept by someone.

Great photos by the way

Hi Peemacgee Well said!
I would guess it is a quality control problem. Either it was rejected and somehow kept by someone without the knowledge of the factory. Or, unlikely, it left the factory and then held off by the service unit when it came to the known by the service centre. (IMHO).
 
Posts
10,442
Likes
16,328
The blueing (particularly on the AML) could be an effect from heat when brazing. This is either a factory cockup or an excellent quality redial where the dial furniture was removed then reapplied, but wth the star there was a d'oh moment. Note on the rear the feet of the applied logo, text and star are ground brighter than the indices suggesting recent work possibly. Either way it raises questions and I wouldn't be rushing to buy it. A brave and competent watchmaker may be able to remove and reattach the star correctly.
 
Posts
1,130
Likes
2,218
The blueing (particularly on the AML) could be an effect from heat when brazing. This is either a factory cockup or an excellent quality redial where the dial furniture was removed then reapplied, but wth the star there was a d'oh moment. Note on the rear the feet of the applied logo, text and star are ground brighter than the indices suggesting recent work possibly. Either way it raises questions and I wouldn't be rushing to buy it. A brave and competent watchmaker may be able to remove and reattach the star correctly.
Dial furniture is riveted not brazed. On the rear, indices are blacker here and brighter there, it is because of the lighting and angle.
 
Posts
13,310
Likes
18,424
Looks to me like some of the dial elements were removed, possibly for a stripping of the original lacquer and replacement with a modern synthetic version.



A blow-up of a blow-up. The star and date window surround seems to be a different color of gold, or heavily tarnished, while the hour markers maintained their original rhodium plating.

The whole effect is very strange to the eye, at least from these photos.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
2,640
Likes
3,093
Honestly, it looks great - and thanks for the opportunity to see the oxidation up close, when you see it on low res online photos, one(me) thinks it's corrosion etc. instead

In your watch, all the stars align, the upside down star and the black Omega logo, it just has a perfect vibe

If it was on auction, I think it would fetch more than a regular one 😁
 
Posts
1,130
Likes
2,218
Looks to me like some of the dial elements were removed, possibly for a stripping of the original lacquer and replacement with a modern synthetic version.
Im sure there is original lacquer. As you see in pictures below: the steps are still flat & sharp, not as gloss as the re-lacquer dial. 1 more thing the scripts on my dial are still on top of original lacquer while the re-lacquer dial have glossy lacquer on top of scripts:
 
Posts
1,130
Likes
2,218
It is a late dial as it has painted indices rather than onyx inserts. (so last quarter/end of the 60s onwards)
Did it come with a watch or separately? (i.e. could it be a service dial?)
Great photos by the way
This dial is from this 168.005, which is correct to my knowledge: