168.005 crown help

Posts
17
Likes
57
Hey everyone, trying to figure out how to use Crown-glass-gasket-list, I looked up the crown for a constellation model 168.005 and looks like its saying 42055 crown. I know the correct crown is suppose to be 10 sided but 42055 isn't the 10 sided crown, am I reading it wrong? Thanks!
 
Posts
214
Likes
162
Hey everyone, trying to figure out how to use Crown-glass-gasket-list, I looked up the crown for a constellation model 168.005 and looks like its saying 42055 crown. I know the correct crown is suppose to be 10 sided but 42055 isn't the 10 sided crown, am I reading it wrong? Thanks!
This may be a replacement crown that omega would use as I don’t believe the decagonal crown is manufactured any longer.

eBay has the ten sided crowns available although gold toned are a bit harder to find than stainless
 
Posts
24,233
Likes
53,967
That is probably a later correct service crown for that reference.
 
Posts
17
Likes
57
That is probably a later correct service crown for that reference.
Would it impact the value alot if its a service crown?
 
Posts
24,233
Likes
53,967
Would it impact the value alot if its a service crown?
What crown is currently on the watch?
 
Posts
17
Likes
57
What crown is currently on the watch?

Just hypothetical, I don’t have a 168.005 but I know that the right crown is 10 sided and wanted to cross reference with the list but was confused when the part number wasn’t the 10 sided crown. If the watch was replaced with a service crown, would that technically be considered the correct crown or how big of an impact would that affect the value because it’s not the original crown?
 
Posts
63
Likes
38
It would be considered a "correct" service crown, but not the "correct" original crown. For a dog leg the decagonal crown would be a big appeal for me as it matches sharp angles of the case style. It would affect value.
 
Posts
6,304
Likes
9,741
It does have an affect on value but only minimal.
The condition of the watch (case/dial) is much more important.
Although not readily available, correct crowns can be found and collectors know that - hence the minimal affect on value.

On the plus side, the replacement crowns, although aesthetically less pleasing on the eye, are much, much easier to use.
 
Posts
1,978
Likes
2,137
It does have an affect on value but only minimal.
The condition of the watch (case/dial) is much more important.
Although not readily available, correct crowns can be found and collectors know that - hence the minimal affect on value.

On the plus side, the replacement crowns, although aesthetically less pleasing on the eye, are much, much easier to use.

That last sentence is VERY much the truth 😁 I swapped my 168.005 to the right decagonal-crown, and every time I have to wind it, I regret swapping the crown. That said, I re-affirm my decision every time I look at it.
 
Posts
29,666
Likes
76,821
Just hypothetical, I don’t have a 168.005 but I know that the right crown is 10 sided and wanted to cross reference with the list but was confused when the part number wasn’t the 10 sided crown. If the watch was replaced with a service crown, would that technically be considered the correct crown or how big of an impact would that affect the value because it’s not the original crown?
The crown you list is the correct service crown specfied by Omega - just verified that on the Omega Extranet.

It would be the crown I would order from Omega if someone was more concerned about water resistance than they were about having the original crown. Different people will value that sort of thing differently, so it may or may not have an impact on value depending on who is buying the watch, and how careful (and how much risk) they want to be with it.
 
Posts
2,162
Likes
1,350
Might be able to find one on eBay. Or maybe a parts supplier has, but after a certain date. Omega gold platted crowns.

Previous were gold capped or gold filled. Even if listed as New Old Stock on eBay. 99% will be plated
 
Posts
13,308
Likes
18,419
On the plus side, the replacement crowns, although aesthetically less pleasing on the eye, are much, much easier to use.
My watch came with a scalloped crown.


I believe that it’s contemporary to the watch, but I really don’t care. It’s so much easier to wind.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
24,233
Likes
53,967
My watch came with a scalloped crown.


I believe that it’s contemporary to the watch, but I really don’t care. It’s so much easier to wind.
gatorcpa
I like the thin scalloped crowns.
 
Posts
6,304
Likes
9,741
My watch came with a scalloped crown.


I believe that it’s contemporary to the watch, but I really don’t care. It’s so much easier to wind.
gatorcpa
Yep, the early doglegs ‘suffered’ from the same ‘affliction’ as the 14381s/14393s in that there are enough that turn up with the thin scalloped crown to suggest they were supplied with them.

And I’ll bet they are much easier to use than the decagonal crowns.
 
Posts
214
Likes
162
Yep, the early doglegs ‘suffered’ from the same ‘affliction’ as the 14381s/14393s in that there are enough that turn up with the thin scalloped crown to suggest they were supplied with them.

And I’ll bet they are much easier to use than the decagonal crowns.
I’d agree with this and I think those two references are universally accepted to have the scalloped crowns. My 14393 has it, and I prefer it to the decagonal crowns on my 14902 and 168.006
 
Posts
6,304
Likes
9,741
I’d agree with this and I think those two references are universally accepted to have the scalloped crowns. My 14393 has it, and I prefer it to the decagonal crowns on my 14902 and 168.006
For those who haven’t seen it, @ConElPueblo
Created an interesting thread on the topic.