Azveld
·this pre-moon has a lot of flaws, but its case has not experienced too much pollution, and above all its mechanism is clean.
1) the bezel is a 2004 model. It is not difficult to find a DNN
2) the crown comes from a Mark II. there too no difficulty in finding the right model
3) same for the original hesalite glass
4) hands ... the subject begins to become more complex.
all hands have been very roughly repainted. still parts to change.
the second hand must obviously be changed.
some of the tritium in the minute and hour hands has fallen off.
do we have to relume?
5) and finally the thorny subject, the dial. what to do ?
the indexes have suffered a lot, there are traces of tools which damaged the black paint.
Should we leave its traces of life or have it repainted (and by whom)?
when I see this kind of work, I want to apply the Sharia of collector by throwing a stone at the bad guy who mistreated it
.
1) the bezel is a 2004 model. It is not difficult to find a DNN
2) the crown comes from a Mark II. there too no difficulty in finding the right model
3) same for the original hesalite glass
4) hands ... the subject begins to become more complex.
all hands have been very roughly repainted. still parts to change.
the second hand must obviously be changed.
some of the tritium in the minute and hour hands has fallen off.
do we have to relume?
5) and finally the thorny subject, the dial. what to do ?
the indexes have suffered a lot, there are traces of tools which damaged the black paint.
Should we leave its traces of life or have it repainted (and by whom)?
when I see this kind of work, I want to apply the Sharia of collector by throwing a stone at the bad guy who mistreated it

.




