+/- 0 on Caliber 9906 while running chronograph continuously

Posts
4
Likes
1
I purchased my first speedy (2022 Speedy '57) about a week ago and it's been fantastic. Since I work with people with different timezone, having a 2nd time at a glance is important so I take the advantage of the minute/hour tracker of the subdial. Basically I started the chronograph at noon or midnight of the other timezone and let the chronograph runs continuously (Omega actually has an official video about this on their youtube channel on the caliber 9300 manual video).

One interesting thing I observed that the movement has been keeping absolutely perfect time at +/- 0s / day, basically no freaking error for the past 4 days that I've let the chronograph runs. I have not stopped the chrono yet, but prior to that I noticed that the watch runs about 1-2s slower after 2 days.

Anyone with technical knowledge can give some input on this?

Here is the video of mine:


 
Posts
21,698
Likes
49,207
You know, there are actually watches specifically made to show time in two different time zones. Chronographs are for measuring elapsed time. 馃榾

Regardless of what a YouTube video claims, the idea that you should remember to start the chronograph running at midnight in a different time zone is absurd. 馃お
 
Posts
5,259
Likes
48,438
Congratulations on your new Speedmaster!

Using your chronograph for a second time zone just makes your tool watch even toolier, which wouldn't be possible without the stacked hour and minute counters.

The Caliber 9300 is Chronometer certified, meaning the expected average timekeeping accuracy would be -4s/+6s per day. I am not aware of any timekeeping standard that is applied explicitly to the chronograph function on its own.

Edit:
Oops. I mis-read your post. Your watch actually has the 9906 manual wind movement, which is Metas certified. This means the expected average timekeeping accuracy would be -0s/+5s per day. Even if I had purchased this watch brand new from an Omega boutique or Authorized Dealer, I wouldn't worry a bit about a watch running one or two seconds slow per day. But that's just me. Others might want to have the watch regulated to achieve something in the 0/+5 range.
Edited:
 
Posts
4
Likes
1
You know, there are actually watches specifically made to show time in two different time zones. Chronographs are for measuring elapsed time. 馃榾

Regardless of what a YouTube video claims, the idea that you should remember to start the chronograph running at midnight in a different time zone is absurd. 馃お
I do have a Tudor blackbay GMT. The thing is I love wearing my speedy 57 as daily and having a second timezone at a glance is just too convenient haha. I only have to start the chrono once and have been running it since (not intended to run it forever, I will stop on days I wear my gmt).
 
Posts
4
Likes
1
Congratulations on your new Speedmaster!

Using your chronograph for a second time zone just makes your tool watch even toolier, which wouldn't be possible without the stacked hour and minute counters.

The Caliber 9300 is Chronometer certified, meaning the expected average timekeeping accuracy would be -4s/+6s per day. I am not aware of any timekeeping standard that is applied explicitly to the chronograph function on its own.

Edit:
Oops. I mis-read your post. Your watch actually has the 9906 manual wind movement, which is Metas certified. This means the expected average timekeeping accuracy would be -0s/+5s per day. Even if I had purchased this watch brand new from an Omega boutique or Authorized Dealer, I wouldn't worry a bit about a watch running one or two seconds slow per day. But that's just me. Others might want to have the watch regulated to achieve something in the 0/+5 range.
Thank you.

What I was trying to explain is:

  • When I let chrono running continuously: Accuracy has been absolutely perfect (-0s in the past 4 days).
  • When I dont run the chrono: -about 2s after 2 days

I just found it interesting that the accuracy is actually better when I let the chronograph runs so I am just trying to learn is there any particular reason why on the technical standpoint?
 
Posts
21,698
Likes
49,207
Thank you.

What I was trying to explain is:

  • When I let chrono running continuously: Accuracy has been absolutely perfect (-0s in the past 4 days).
  • When I dont run the chrono: -about 2s after 2 days

I just found it interesting that the accuracy is actually better when I let the chronograph runs so I am just trying to learn is there any particular reason why on the technical standpoint?
It just changed the timing a bit when you added the load, and under the specific conditions you measured, it ran faster and became more accurate. There's nothing fundamentally more accurate about it, it depends on the positions and other things.
 
Posts
5,259
Likes
48,438
Thank you.

What I was trying to explain is:

  • When I let chrono running continuously: Accuracy has been absolutely perfect (-0s in the past 4 days).
  • When I dont run the chrono: -about 2s after 2 days

I just found it interesting that the accuracy is actually better when I let the chronograph runs so I am just trying to learn is there any particular reason why on the technical standpoint?
Got it, thanks for the clarification

I have let some of my chronographs run for a day or two and noticed that their timekeeping is different compared to when the chronograph is not running. But sometimes the chronograph runs faster, and sometimes slower, depending on the watch. The only thing that would surprise me is if there was no difference at all (chrono vs no chrono). But I don't have a technical explanation that suggests running the chronograph would make a watch run consistently faster or consistently slower.
 
Posts
173
Likes
130
I'm surprised it slowed down as it's vertically clutched.
 
Posts
7
Likes
1
I purchased my first speedy (2022 Speedy '57) about a week ago and it's been fantastic. Since I work with people with different timezone, having a 2nd time at a glance is important so I take the advantage of the minute/hour tracker of the subdial. Basically I started the chronograph at noon or midnight of the other timezone and let the chronograph runs continuously (Omega actually has an official video about this on their youtube channel on the caliber 9300 manual video).

One interesting thing I observed that the movement has been keeping absolutely perfect time at +/- 0s / day, basically no freaking error for the past 4 days that I've let the chronograph runs. I have not stopped the chrono yet, but prior to that I noticed that the watch runs about 1-2s slower after 2 days.

Anyone with technical knowledge can give some input on this?

Here is the video of mine:


I've owned the spirate 9920 for about a year now. and did notice some differences compared to the twin barrel 8900 series and the 8800 single barrel series, Though an assumption. the twin barrel 9300 9900 series movements seem to have more torque. and seems to be more stable to friction flux caused by temperature, Another assumption was. with more torque. a slight beat error in the balance inertia bolts would cause more fluctuation of timing in each position,

From these prehistoric methods of observations. I feel the 9300 9900 movements are calibers that need more intense regulating. but when regulation is successful. they become more accurate and stable than the other metas movements,

With all that said. your specific movement may probably has a slight weight difference on a certain point on the balance wheel. and when torque to the balance differs. the slight off balance causes the balance to run slightly slower. causing the minus in your specic position,

There should be a position that runs fast too. so if you can find that position. rest the watch in that position to even out the minus.
 
Posts
5,276
Likes
24,355
I think it has more to do with how active you was before and after, also other positions the watch spent in those days which caused it being +/-0 compared to before.

This post also answers a watch' rate with or without the chrono running.

 
Posts
4
Likes
1
I think it has more to do with how active you was before and after, also other positions the watch spent in those days which caused it being +/-0 compared to before.

This post also answers a watch' rate with or without the chrono running.

I've owned the spirate 9920 for about a year now. and did notice some differences compared to the twin barrel 8900 series and the 8800 single barrel series, Though an assumption. the twin barrel 9300 9900 series movements seem to have more torque. and seems to be more stable to friction flux caused by temperature, Another assumption was. with more torque. a slight beat error in the balance inertia bolts would cause more fluctuation of timing in each position,

From these prehistoric methods of observations. I feel the 9300 9900 movements are calibers that need more intense regulating. but when regulation is successful. they become more accurate and stable than the other metas movements,

With all that said. your specific movement may probably has a slight weight difference on a certain point on the balance wheel. and when torque to the balance differs. the slight off balance causes the balance to run slightly slower. causing the minus in your specic position,

There should be a position that runs fast too. so if you can find that position. rest the watch in that position to even out the minus.
Thank you very informative read. I just want to have a better understanding on small things of the timepiece.