Zuckerberg bought Rolex SA ... Is this for real?

Posts
7,682
Likes
14,206
If it's on the internet it has to be true. So I guess he did.
 
Posts
1,790
Likes
2,002
Hey, don't be too hard on him, he's not the only one with a corona-cut.
It actually looks better now than usual, IMO.
Only guy on the planet to benefit from no hairdresser. Every time I see him in the news, I just stare at his bad hair.

Forgive my shallowness.
 
Posts
10,765
Likes
52,868
So if I own a few shares of Facebook do I now own Rolex? Cause I don’t own a Rolex.
 
Posts
3,785
Likes
20,205
Hey! No fair! I had dibs and you all know it!
 
Posts
1,206
Likes
5,036
Unless I am missing something, I don't think Zuckerberg uses Twitter so...
 
Posts
1,484
Likes
8,113
Nope, he’s burnt too badly* with Oculus Rift.
(Too badly = spare change, I guess)

Zuck will not buy hardware again.
 
Posts
16,863
Likes
47,901
Zuckerberg buying Rolex would be cool.

but

 
Posts
2,011
Likes
3,396
AFAIK Zuckerberg famously doesn’t wear watches, hence the satirical article
 
Posts
4,114
Likes
16,324
Can’t buy the watch, buy the brand 👍 I like 😁
 
Posts
8,097
Likes
28,526
I wish he would buy Hodinkee, so that some the disgust could be consolidated. 😁
 
Posts
2,675
Likes
7,487
"The Balance Cock Bugle" is satire.

I mean, have a look at the name!
... and a fun read!

While community opposition has begun to mount against Zuckerberg’s further restriction of product flow, he remains cryptic, “The future exists in China, which is exactly why we’ll relocate our headquarters for operations in Beijing where we’ll quadruple production. This is not to say they’ll become more widely available… we don’t even know what Rolex is yet. How big it can get, how far it can go. A million Submariners isn’t cool, you know what’s cool? A billion Submariners.”
 
Posts
253
Likes
444
Didn’t he mentioned “Why not buy a Rolex” to his management team after finishing annual profit & loss meeting?