Forums Latest Members
  1. MMMD unaffiliated curmudgeonly absurdist & polyologist Apr 1, 2015

    Posts
    4,642
    Likes
    31,005
    1957. The heyday of Ephrem Jobin.
    Captains with cal 133.8 and 71...
    [​IMG]

    ...Port Royals with cal 135...
    [​IMG]

    ...Cioccolatoni with cal 133.8.
    [​IMG]

    But none of these models appeared on the dust jacket of the lovely little book Zenith published that year.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Instead, it was something more colorful... these cloisonné "smoking watches" in solid gold:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Their movement is depicted only on the dust jacket, not within the book itself, and it is quite distinctive.
    [​IMG]

    The base plates are cut and arranged in the form of a monogram. The Zenith faithful may recognize the initials.
    [​IMG]

    I haven't seen a smoking watch yet, but they are on my list now... and the stogies are ready.
     
    jordn, Stewart H, khmt2 and 2 others like this.
  2. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Apr 1, 2015

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    Lovely post. Smokin' watches are one thing, but hats off, gents, and a moment of silence for all of the 18K bracelets that have been lost.....
     
    Georgieboy58 and MMMD like this.
  3. MMMD unaffiliated curmudgeonly absurdist & polyologist Apr 1, 2015

    Posts
    4,642
    Likes
    31,005
    Goodbye, yellow brick road. :(
     
    cristos71 likes this.
  4. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Apr 1, 2015

    Posts
    26,995
    Likes
    32,711
    I know man just thinking those thin gold bracelet must have stretched and disintegrated within no time flat.
     
  5. ELV web Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    2,668
    Likes
    24,651
    image.jpg One preserved here, although not a zenith :p
     
  6. Stewart H Honorary NJ Resident Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    3,070
    Likes
    3,510
    Pimps like to be a little more discrete these days.
     
  7. Tony C. Ωf Jury member Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    7,387
    Likes
    24,226
    Along the same lines, here's a nice illustration of how times have changed from 1970 until now…

    [​IMG]
     
    MMMD likes this.
  8. MMMD unaffiliated curmudgeonly absurdist & polyologist Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    4,642
    Likes
    31,005
    Tony, the comparison of that Steinemesque cover from 1970 with a modern-day SI swimsuit issue is misleading. Let's look at the evolution of Cheryl Tiegs in the 70's to give us an idea of the pace of change in that decade alone. You are giving short shrift to the Age of Disco...

    1975:
    [​IMG]

    1978 (not a cover, but in the pages of SI):
    [​IMG]
     
  9. Tony C. Ωf Jury member Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    7,387
    Likes
    24,226
    Ah, but you've missed a couple of crucial, albeit nuanced points. The women who graced those pages in the '70s had no silicone added, and likely weren't shaven to pre-pubecent levels!
     
  10. MMMD unaffiliated curmudgeonly absurdist & polyologist Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    4,642
    Likes
    31,005
    You are correct, sir. From my point of view, it was the best of times, it was the worst of times.
     
  11. Stewart H Honorary NJ Resident Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    3,070
    Likes
    3,510
    Does that make the 90's the happy medium of female topiary?
     
  12. MMMD unaffiliated curmudgeonly absurdist & polyologist Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    4,642
    Likes
    31,005
    You know, this thread started off in a pretty high-minded vein. But yes, that is true about the 90's. Finally, Brazil was no longer just the country of the future.
     
  13. Stewart H Honorary NJ Resident Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    3,070
    Likes
    3,510
    :)OF strikes again. Watches to smut in half a dozen posts.