Yup, that's definitely a choice

Posts
818
Likes
3,126
From today's Omega marketing email:
visuel-1a.png
 
Posts
2,890
Likes
11,948
A good looking watch, despite my first glance thinking it was being worn upside down on the right arm (the outside of the cuff link gave it away)
 
Posts
18,246
Likes
27,586
The picture is inverted.
 
Posts
10,896
Likes
53,912
Looks a lot better without the gold on the bezel like many of the modern constellations.
 
Posts
2,738
Likes
3,635
I still cant get past the bezel on these, but the rest is very well done.

taking another look at it, if they just removed the Roman numerals but kept the overall shape of the bezel, I might consider one.
 
Posts
1,605
Likes
6,483
I don't like the integrated bracelet on these. If they fixed that and the bezel I might be a player on one of these
 
Posts
992
Likes
1,798
I thought 4 in Roman numerals was IV and not IIII as displayed on this bezel. 😕
 
Posts
617
Likes
2,975
The Connies from the 50s and early 60s have so much more elegance than those... My honest opinion 🤔
 
Posts
2,573
Likes
3,800
I thought 4 in Roman numerals was IV and not IIII as displayed on this bezel. 😕
This Omega is from the late 40’s

Both these pocket watch dials (Rockford and Elgin)are pre 1930 I believe and have IIII instead of IV.
Edited: