From today's Omega marketing email:

 

A good looking watch, despite my first glance thinking it was being worn upside down on the right arm (the outside of the cuff link gave it away)

 

I still cant get past the bezel on these, but the rest is very well done.

 

No, No, No, that is just not for me at all, no definitely not.

 

The picture is inverted.

 

That guy needs longer sleeves.

 

Looks a lot better without the gold on the bezel like many of the modern constellations.

 

taking another look at it, if they just removed the Roman numerals but kept the overall shape of the bezel, I might consider one.

 

Do not want.

 

Would not be my first choice with a tuxedo.

 

No, you're just looking at it the wrong way.

 

I don't like the integrated bracelet on these. If they fixed that and the bezel I might be a player on one of these

 

I thought 4 in Roman numerals was IV and not IIII as displayed on this bezel.

 

The Connies from the 50s and early 60s have so much more elegance than those... My honest opinion

 

This Omega is from the late 40’s

Both these pocket watch dials (Rockford and Elgin)are pre 1930 I believe and have IIII instead of IV.

 

Deleted