Forums Latest Members

Thoughts on this Seamaster 166.010 cal. 564 chronometer cert.

  1. scv55 Jan 6, 2018

    Posts
    334
    Likes
    1,703
    I have my eyes locked onto this Seamaster 166.010. I would be trading my Geneve +/- cash. My grandfather used to have one very similar to this (according to my dad), but unfortunately it met its demise many many years ago after he attempted to clean paint off of it by soaking the watch in paint thinner...all thats left is the story of him buying a silver, non numerical Seamaster in Holland in the 1950's while he worked for Aristotle Onassis on oil tankers. sigh.

    Anyways...

    Your thoughts? They are asking just under 2k..it does look pristine. No pictures of the movement, but Ill ask for them before I pull the trigger.

    The other picture is of my Geneve.
     
    Screen Shot 2018-01-06 at 2.46.34 PM.png Screen Shot 2018-01-06 at 2.46.25 PM.png IMG_8189.jpg Screen Shot 2018-01-06 at 2.55.34 PM.png
    blacka01, fskywalker and ConElPueblo like this.
  2. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Jan 6, 2018

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,232
    2K what?
     
  3. fjf Jan 6, 2018

    Posts
    766
    Likes
    743
    Dimitris likes this.
  4. scv55 Jan 6, 2018

    Posts
    334
    Likes
    1,703
    USD
     
  5. scv55 Jan 6, 2018

    Posts
    334
    Likes
    1,703
    Personally I wouldn't mind if the case was polished, and the crystal was replaced. As long as the dial hasn't been repainted/recoated. The dial is really what I'd like to remain original, followed by the hands, case etc. (and of course the movement!)
     
  6. fjf Jan 6, 2018

    Posts
    766
    Likes
    743
    I wouldnt pay 2K, but that's just me. There are no pics of the movement.
     
    efauser likes this.
  7. scv55 Jan 6, 2018

    Posts
    334
    Likes
    1,703
    What is more reasonable? 1,500? I am going to ask for movement photos after they decide what my Geneve will fetch. Speaking of which, anyone on here have an idea what the Geneve may get for trade-in?
     
  8. Shabbaz Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    4,898
    Likes
    17,858
    I think the chronometer version is the 168.024 (cal 564) but because the caseback of the 166.010 (cal 565) is interchangable with the 168.024 omega used the 166.010 for the 168.024. You also see both of the modelnumbers in the caseback. I have a couple of these as well.
     
    20180106_124655.jpg Screenshot_20180105-155154.jpg 20171121_140528.jpg Screenshot_20171118-222013.png
  9. Shabbaz Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    4,898
    Likes
    17,858
    Movement:
     
    Screenshot_20171118-222018.png
  10. Shabbaz Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    4,898
    Likes
    17,858
    166.010 with caliber 565:
     
    Screenshot_20180107-131118.jpg Screenshot_20180107-131157.jpg Screenshot_20180107-131352.jpg
  11. scv55 Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    334
    Likes
    1,703
    Those are very nice. Because the one I am looking at purchasing appears to have virtually no patina on the dial, does anyone believe that its been refurbished? Or is the original condition explain the relatively high asking price?
     
  12. Shabbaz Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    4,898
    Likes
    17,858
    Who's selling? If it's a dealer with a shop that explains the high price.
     
  13. Shabbaz Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    4,898
    Likes
    17,858
    I think the dial is original but it's best to see pictures in normal daylight.
     
  14. scv55 Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    334
    Likes
    1,703
    Yes it is a reputable dealer that a family member has used in the past
     
  15. scv55 Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    334
    Likes
    1,703
    Ill ask if anything isn't original
     
  16. Shabbaz Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    4,898
    Likes
    17,858
    You pay always a premium when buying from a dealer.
     
    DanT likes this.
  17. scv55 Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    334
    Likes
    1,703
  18. scv55 Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    334
    Likes
    1,703
  19. Gordon Heavyfoot Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    463
    Likes
    391
  20. scv55 Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    334
    Likes
    1,703
    This one isn't chronometer certified and has a 562 movement instead of the 564. Also no bracelet (or even leather aftermarket strap) and appears to be in much worse shape..also I don't know when/who serviced it last. IMO not a fair comparison.

    That being said, is the OP Seamaster worth 4X's the price? Good question, and I appreciate your help. I found two other chronometer certified Seamasters that are very similar being asked for more money.

    I'm pretty new to this so any help is appreciated!