Community Stories

Ya can't be more of a newbie than me

cadjak
Posts
1
Likes
2
I was given this Omega yesterday. It came from my mother-in-law. I know nothing about watches. If this is a "real" Omega, I may be reluctant to even wear it, since I work around machinery. I was told that the crystal had been replaced and the watch serviced before she gave it to me. What can you tell me about the age and exactly which kind of Omega this might be?
CM200917-220325005.jpg CM200917-220631011.jpg
Thanks
 
Dan S
Posts
24,596
Likes
54,624
It's real all right. It's a Seamaster as noted on the dial, and a very nice gift, especially since it was serviced. There are some experts on the forum who may be able to recognize the reference number just from looking at the case. As for age, I am going to guess 1960-ish. The best way to get the information is to look at the numbers inside the watch (serial number and reference number), but this type of case needs an expert to open.
 
DaveK
Posts
5,076
Likes
15,698
Nice gift! Wear it, but as you say, just not to work. These old pieces are also best kept away from water, definitely no swimming or rain.
 
UncleBuck
Posts
3,591
Likes
8,206
Small medallion Seamaster with straight thin lugs, ref. 2846 or 2848 from 1960ish?
Dial has been cleaned perhaps, explaining the faded Seamaster and Automatic font parts. (Omega is applied)

The caseback inside nomenclature would tell much more. We don't know "nuffin" without seeing inside.

Great gift and iconic watch in my book. A sympathetic service with a new or cleaned crystal and it will outlive us!
 
Dan S
Posts
24,596
Likes
54,624
UncleBuck UncleBuck
Dial has been cleaned perhaps, explaining the faded Seamaster and Automatic font parts. (Omega is applied)

Some of that could just be crystal damage. Hard to tell from that photo.
 
Maskelyne
Posts
365
Likes
453
I asses the dial as just fine. All lume seems to be in place and all scripts as well. The crystal is damaged/scratched not the dial as I see it.

Enhanced picture...

Omega.jpg
 
Rochete
Posts
1,232
Likes
5,682
Beautiful. Wear it with gusto only not to work or the beach.
 
UncleBuck
Posts
3,591
Likes
8,206
KingCrouchy KingCrouchy
Looks like a Ref.14770
Disagree, 14770 lugs differ.
Regardless, let's see the guts of this beauty and get this crystal resolved!
 
JwRosenthal
Posts
16,305
Likes
45,005
'61 Seamaster Deville (PreDeville) which means to the OP, the first year of production of the front-loader cased Seamasters, they didn't print "DeVille" on the dial. Should have a 562 movement.
 
gbesq
Posts
9,897
Likes
56,013
JwRosenthal JwRosenthal
'61 Seamaster Deville (PreDeville) which means to the OP, the first year of production of the front-loader cased Seamasters, they didn't print "DeVille" on the dial. Should have a 562 movement.
I agree.
 
ed123
Posts
21
Likes
19
Can I just say as a newbie creeping on other people's threads, its pretty impressive to see people able to dissect the make and model (history?) of an object just from 2 pics. I'm not a subject matter expert on anything except my interest in this kind of watch.. So. Nice.
 
Sign up or log in to reply...

Similar threads

G

This can't be a Real Seamaster can it?

graftdesign Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
Luxostore
Luxostore
Posts
27
Views
3K
brzab

Confessions of a newbie watchaholic and new member

brzab Open Discussion
roach7
roach7
Posts
4
Views
1K