WSRUW: What Seiko Are You Wearing Today?

Posts
471
Likes
2,286
This bracelet looks great on the watch. Better than the NATO i have it on. Thanks for sharing 😀. Now I could figure out how to get the world timer to show another country time 😀

Your example is much nicer than mine - would look great!
 
Posts
2,219
Likes
4,946
Unfortunately not mine, but was struck by how modern this 6138-3002 looks when I finished it. Big watch too being a jumbo. Must get around to sorting my UFO one day...

Cheers, Chris
 
Posts
2,327
Likes
2,541
Unfortunately not mine, but was struck by how modern this 6138-3002 looks when I finished it. Big watch too being a jumbo. Must get around to sorting my UFO one day...

Cheers, Chris

Mesh bands do add a mechanistic vibe, sort of Metropolis like. The tubular ends compliment the rounded ends of the lugs and straight edge of the case.

I put one, a cheap but well made Chinese copy, on one of my Quartz watches but found it irritated my wrist after awhile. My Midlands had a mesh band when I got it but I put a copy of a Spiedel expansion band on it at first opportunity.
Still like the looks of them even If i can't wear them.
 
Posts
2,219
Likes
4,946
I wear a few watches with mesh bracelets and I quite like them - don't really irritate me, fortunately. I popped this ROWI mesh on as it arrived without anything and dead...


This will get him going while he thinks about what he wants and, they are not expensive. I like the look but possibly something a bit heavier might work better. Anyone know what was on these originally?

Cheers, Chris
 
Posts
824
Likes
8,230
Seiko # 3. The spaceship has landed- direct from Miyazaki!!! Seiko Speedtimer
6139-7020 off the ‘Bay for $500. Love the warm champagne dial and the whole layout period. The orange and yellow hands really play up the sporty genre too.
 
Posts
824
Likes
8,230
The one thing that’s throwing me off - is this: If this JDM dial version of the Seiko 613-600x came out after, say 1975 - wouldn’t the movement be a 6139B
( versus the 6139A inside ) ???
 
Posts
18,058
Likes
27,374
The one thing that’s throwing me off - is this: If this JDM dial version of the Seiko 613-600x came out after, say 1975 - wouldn’t the movement be a 6139B
( versus the 6139A inside ) ???
The date code on the watch shows Feb of 71
http://www.watchsleuth.com/seikodatefinder/?mvmt=6139&case=7020&serial=125351

Feb of 71 would be a resist dial and case, the first of the non-notched case, and one of the last 6139a movements.

It reads as OK to me, minus the dial. I am using this as a guide for it

https://thespringbar.com/blogs/guides/the-seiko-6139-600x-collectors-guide


It does seem to read via that website that the dial is post 75. But that might take more research it is a suwa dial though which might help you drill it down more. It is possible that this one has a later dial on it. My guess is that the low price you paid for it, is a sign that the Seiko collectors identified the later dial as not being original to the piece.. either way you got a good deal IMHO, and you can hunt for the correct dial.
 
Posts
824
Likes
8,230
The date code on the watch shows Feb of 71
http://www.watchsleuth.com/seikodatefinder/?mvmt=6139&case=7020&serial=125351

Feb of 71 would be a resist dial and case, the first of the non-notched case, and one of the last 6139a movements.

It reads as OK to me, minus the dial. I am using this as a guide for it

https://thespringbar.com/blogs/guides/the-seiko-6139-600x-collectors-guide


It does seem to read via that website that the dial is post 75. But that might take more research it is a suwa dial though which might help you drill it down more. It is possible that this one has a later dial on it. My guess is that the low price you paid for it, is a sign that the Seiko collectors identified the later dial as not being original to the piece.. either way you got a good deal IMHO, and you can hunt for the correct dial.

Foo2, awesome job! Thank you in spades. I wish I knew this going in. Sorta a newbie tax I guess. I had read that Col. Pogue/ Springbar article too ( after the buy).... but I was sidetracked on the movement aspect. —Not the dial .ouch!
( as you ably pointed out and dated to Feb. 1971). So it’s the most probable that it’s the dial that’s off . I’m not terribly upset ( but wished I knew prior) ... If I ever sell it, I’ll def disclose that. My fault for not ascertaining properly.
 
Posts
906
Likes
1,454
Foo2, awesome job! Thank you in spades. I wish I knew this going in. Sorta a newbie tax I guess. I had read that Col. Pogue/ Springbar article too ( after the buy).... but I was sidetracked on the movement aspect. —Not the dial .ouch!
( as you ably pointed out and dated to Feb. 1971). So it’s the most probable that it’s the dial that’s off . I’m not terribly upset ( but wished I knew prior) ... If I ever sell it, I’ll def disclose that. My fault for not ascertaining properly.
Oh well, it still looks amazing in spites of the flaws.
 
Posts
649
Likes
2,090
I wear a few watches with mesh bracelets and I quite like them - don't really irritate me, fortunately. I popped this ROWI mesh on as it arrived without anything and dead...


This will get him going while he thinks about what he wants and, they are not expensive. I like the look but possibly something a bit heavier might work better. Anyone know what was on these originally?

Cheers, Chris

It should be a fishbone design like this (credit to TheWatchSpotBlog):

 
Posts
2,219
Likes
4,946
It should be a fishbone design like this (credit to TheWatchSpotBlog):

Many thanks @adi4 - that certainly looks impressive. Not sure why I couldn't find that information so your help is much appreciated. I think the mesh will be coming off as I just ordered one of these (I know this model is not listed but it has 19mm lugs and my risk is small).

Will post a picture when it is back together and am sure my customer will be thrilled.👍

Cheers, Chris
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Posts
824
Likes
8,230
The date code on the watch shows Feb of 71
http://www.watchsleuth.com/seikodatefinder/?mvmt=6139&case=7020&serial=125351

Feb of 71 would be a resist dial and case, the first of the non-notched case, and one of the last 6139a movements.

It reads as OK to me, minus the dial. I am using this as a guide for it

https://thespringbar.com/blogs/guides/the-seiko-6139-600x-collectors-guide


It does seem to read via that website that the dial is post 75. But that might take more research it is a suwa dial though which might help you drill it down more. It is possible that this one has a later dial on it. My guess is that the low price you paid for it, is a sign that the Seiko collectors identified the later dial as not being original to the piece.. either way you got a good deal IMHO, and you can hunt for the correct dial.

From what I’m seeing ( so far ) on the SCWF ( Seiko citizens watch forum ) and a few sites where watchmakers were either expertly restoring a similar 6139-7020 or selling one- it seems that this dial variant “7040T”; the champagne dial on my JDM Speedtimer is legit. Looks like the notched case and the 6139A movement and case date of Feb 71 all line up.. There’s also a comprehensive listing ( with pics of course)of the myriad models of the 6139-x on a Spanish site
“ foroderejoles.es” which clearly depicts mine.. feeling better - but will still dig around.
 
Posts
18,058
Likes
27,374
Sunday Cocktails
Both are sexy. The black is gorgeous!!
 
Posts
2,326
Likes
7,545
Its more of dark brown.

Ty sir.

Do you prefer having the “presage” on the dial?
 
Posts
18,058
Likes
27,374
Its more of dark brown.

Ty sir.

Do you prefer having the “presage” on the dial?
6 one way half dozen the other. Anyone that cares about presage knows they are the same quality. I think it’s cleaner without but it’s also nice to have it on the dial. Does that make sense?