Some of these you post are actually hard to spot what is wrong.
Maybe we need a ”good redials” thread, a good redial does probably damage the market more than obvious bad redials that anyone can spot.
My totally untrained eye can't tell that these are re-dials.
This Is a tricky one...
No lume on the dial but it states ' T SWISS T '
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/193517672450
This seller has a history of some pretty atrocious examples, but somehow people keep paying good money for them 😕
Not only is the dial a total work of fiction, the watch itself is too of course with movement and case totally out of sync.
So far so ebay, but what I don't like about this especially is the air of legitimacy the seller tries to present.
The wall of text about the movement is like a distraction technique and the sort of thing that might catch out noobs, meanwhile there's no mention that the hands are inauthentic or the fact it's not even a Seamaster. Maybe he was too busy with that luminous orange highlighter pen 😉
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/193517672450
This seller has a history of some pretty atrocious examples, but somehow people keep paying good money for them 😕
Not only is the dial a total work of fiction, the watch itself is too of course with movement and case totally out of sync.
So far so ebay, but what I don't like about this especially is the air of legitimacy the seller tries to present.
The wall of text about the movement is like a distraction technique and the sort of thing that might catch out noobs, meanwhile there's no mention that the hands are inauthentic or the fact it's not even a Seamaster. Maybe he was too busy with that luminous orange highlighter pen 😉