Why no bids on this 3570.50?

Posts
18,202
Likes
27,530
18/17 jewel changeover is disproved according to MWO.

My point is there is a small subset of the last of the tritium from the 2 years after the model number change before luminova dials that might have the 1861. Otherwise according to MWO those watches are identical to the last of the previous pic code. Most apparently ran the 861. Other then being 2 years with tritium on that pic code there is nothing special about them as they are identical to the preceding watch just with a different code.

Tritium 3570 should be priced with the earlier tritium 3590's.
 
Posts
1,872
Likes
1,402
18/17 jewel changeover is disproved according to MWO.

My point is there is a small subset of the last of the tritium from the 2 years after the model number change before luminova dials that might have the 1861. Otherwise according to MWO those watches are identical to the last of the previous pic code. Most apparently ran the 861. Other then being 2 years with tritium on that pic code there is nothing special about them as they are identical to the preceding watch just with a different code.

Tritium 3570 should be priced with the earlier tritium 3590's.

I never said the changeover happened along with the 3590 to 3570 moniker change as there are plenty of 3590s with the 18th jewel present, just that by the time the 3570 came to be the 18th jewel was already present.

That being said the only real price difference b/w the two should come down to the bracelet, whereas all 3570s came with a model superior to the 1479. But since some late model 3590s came with the 1499 bracelet it's basically a moot point.