Which Forstner Flat Link for a 1861?

Posts
30
Likes
12
Need help deciding which Forstner Flatlink bracelet to get. I have a 1861 SMP. Can’t decide between the brushed/polished and the fully brushed version. What did you get and why?
 
Posts
654
Likes
1,031
They were supposed to introduce a Flat link update.
I'd check for that update.
About polished/brushed, I'd say polished, because it's easy to brush in case you don't like it.
 
Posts
963
Likes
1,250
I was going to go with the fully brushed Uncle Seiko, to minimize visible scuffs, until I found a unused brushed/polished Forstner for sale second hand. Here's a few pics of it with Uncle end links on my KSK:

 
Posts
30
Likes
12
They were supposed to introduce a Flat link update.
I'd check for that update.
About polished/brushed, I'd say polished, because it's easy to brush in case you don't like it.

I think there is already an updated version out if I interpret this Fratello article right:
https://www.fratellowatches.com/forstner-flat-link-bracelet-speedmaster-2021/#gref
With the changes, including the single screw heads and removal of the lug stoppers, this new Flat Link is even better.

Although, one slight criticism remains for the bunching up of the links near the end. I shared this feedback in my last review and have experienced this with the new bracelet too. It is nowhere near as noticeable as the previous version, so Forstner has made some improvements.
 
Posts
97
Likes
79
I chose the all brushed. I think it looks better and actually highlights the polished case details.

I like the Forstner bracelet for the screw links and the stretchy bit of the bracelet.

I do not like the solid end link - the curved shape looks odd between the lugs and the position of the spring bar hole causes the top bracelet links to bunch up and sit in a strange way.
Also the finishing of the solid end link is poor and needs a quick file and polish of the tabs to avoid scratching the case. (hindsight 🙁)
I use the Uncle Seiko hollow end link instead - it has a flatter appearance and allows the bracelet to hang off the spring bar correctly.

I was also disappointed with the Forstner clasp - I use an Omega 1182/173 clasp instead.

The updated version may have solved some of my issues though.

All in all I love the all brushed Flat Link look and alternate it with the Uncle Seiko 1171. I am seriously considering a 1479 style Bracelet in Brushed/Polished now though!
 
Posts
63
Likes
63
The existing flatlink has indeed been updated since the original release. Improvements are changed screw system for sizing, clasp has been updated to be longer with a shorter inner folding part similar to the one on the Forstner 1450 as well.

They are planning on launching a modern more substantial flatlink with a milled clasp in the very near future according to their Instagram. It actually looks pretty awesome. Hoping the milled out clasp will be available for purchase separately but it’s supposed to be compatible with the original flatlink.

Per suggestion above you may want to hold off to see what the new one looks like before pulling the trigger.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CQ13-TDrIIS/?utm_medium=copy_link
Edited:
 
Posts
5,048
Likes
15,518
They are cheap enough to get both and decide on the fly…then change your mind again after some time…and again…etc 😀
 
Posts
795
Likes
1,156
Which Forstner Flat Link for a 1861?

Easy.
Uncle Seiko's flat-link. ..
No tiny screws even if I have make do with no stretch links, something many wish US would do.

.. but there's also Uncle Seiko's 1479 bracelet to consider too.
 
Posts
30
Likes
12
The existing flatlink has indeed been updated since the original release. Improvements are changed screw system for sizing, clasp has been updated to be longer with a shorter inner folding part similar to the one on the Forstner 1450 as well.

They are planning on launching a modern more substantial flatlink with a milled clasp in the very near future according to their Instagram. It actually looks pretty awesome. Hoping the milled out clasp will be available for purchase separately but it’s supposed to be compatible with the original flatlink.

Per suggestion above you may want to hold off to see what the new one looks like before pulling the trigger.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CQ13-TDrIIS/?utm_medium=copy_link
So there’s version 3 in the making. Didn’t know that. Will hold off for now then. Too bad - I was pretty hyped up to pull the trigger though.
 
Posts
63
Likes
63
Well the new one will be more of a modern substantial bracelet. If you wanted a more vintage vibe/feel the existing is still worth considering.

Those who want the more vintage feel similar to the original omega flatlinks may still choose to go with the current one instead of the modern one even after it’s released.
Edited:
 
Posts
97
Likes
79
@Lex_Lugga The new milled clasp from Forstner looks great - I will be getting one of those when available.

@FFabian I would wait for the new Forstner, looks like release is imminent. In the meantime could try one of the other models available? . . 1171 . . 1479 . .
 
Posts
30
Likes
12
Well the new one will be more of a modern substantial bracelet. If you wanted a more vintage vibe/feel the existing is still worth considering.

Those who want the more vintage feel similar to the original omega flatlinks may still choose to go with the current one instead of the modern one even after it’s released.
I want a good looking, functional alternative to the somewhat clunky 1861 OEM bracelet or the new, pricy and difficult to source 3861 OEM bracelet.

Fratello seems smitten with the Forstner bracelets as they publish a Forstner article every few days it seems 😉
So I thought why not give a try. Only thing that bother me is that the exclusive EU distributor is in the UK FFS.

My initial impetus for starting this thread was a question of style (polished or not) because I have a hard time deciding such things. But good that I asked - will now wait for the new bracelet.

I am seriously considering a 1479 style Bracelet in Brushed/Polished now though!

Yeah I really like the look the 1479 US bracelet. Kind of similar but different to the OEM bracelet ... and tapers to the clasp.
Edited:
 
Posts
6,541
Likes
26,514
I want a good looking, functional alternative to the somewhat clunky 1861 OEM bracelet or the new, pricy and difficult to source 3861 OEM bracelet.
It is pricey but not difficult to source. I called up my boutique and they had both the brushed and brushed/polished in stock. Shipped it to me with free 2-day shipping.


I might be in a minority but I did not like the Forstners flat link or US. They are nice but felt too cheap and flimsy. I can see how others say they “have a vintage feel” but I much prefer my vintage Omega bracelets, which don’t feel that cheap. I ended selling both the Forstners and US bracelets.
Edited:
 
Posts
133
Likes
87
It is pricey but not difficult to source. I called up my boutique and they had both the brushed and brushed/polished in stock. Shipped it to me with free 2-day shipping.

Seconded.

I reached out via the chat function on Omega's US website, and they had a boutique call me since there isn't one nearby. I think I snagged mine back in May? It wasn't an issue at all.
 
Posts
30
Likes
12
Seconded.

I reached out via the chat function on Omega's US website, and they had a boutique call me since there isn't one nearby. I think I snagged mine back in May? It wasn't an issue at all.
How much did you pay?
 
Posts
133
Likes
87
How much did you pay?

US$680, plus tax. For me, it was US$727.60 total. Shipping was free, and it made it from Florida to Boston in 2 days.
 
Posts
6,541
Likes
26,514
US$680, plus tax. For me, it was US$727.60 total. Shipping was free, and it made it from Florida to Boston in 2 days.
Yup, this is how much I paid as well
 
Posts
639
Likes
626
The existing flatlink has indeed been updated since the original release. Improvements are changed screw system for sizing, clasp has been updated to be longer with a shorter inner folding part similar to the one on the Forstner 1450 as well.

They are planning on launching a modern more substantial flatlink with a milled clasp in the very near future according to their Instagram. It actually looks pretty awesome. Hoping the milled out clasp will be available for purchase separately but it’s supposed to be compatible with the original flatlink.

Per suggestion above you may want to hold off to see what the new one looks like before pulling the trigger.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CQ13-TDrIIS/?utm_medium=copy_link

Oh my. That's a game changer. I like the Forstner bracelets and own a couple, but I'm not a big fan of the old school stamped clasp unless it's going on a truly vintage watch,