- Posts
- 7,080
- Likes
- 22,971
M'Bob
·Listed as a ref. 6305?
What’s wrong with this picture?
- Posts
- 963
- Likes
- 1,251
sleepyastronaut
·Heavy handed polishing? Smooth bezel? Missing cyclops?
- Posts
- 733
- Likes
- 1,457
WatchCor
·Hour markers?
- Posts
- 2,443
- Likes
- 4,231
wsfarrell
·I've seen them without the cyclops, but not with a smooth bezel.
- Posts
- 532
- Likes
- 2,315
Linesiders
··Stripers, not snook.Quick googleFu shows some with smooth bezels - but normal to see turned bezels of some sort.
- Posts
- 5,054
- Likes
- 15,573
eugeneandresson
·There is no 'penetrating oil'?
- Posts
- 7,080
- Likes
- 22,971
M'Bob
·Typically, ref 6305 has a reeded/fluted bezel; if this bezel is original, it would more likely be found on a ref. 6304. So my guess is the bezel might be aftermarket.
- Posts
- 3,825
- Likes
- 6,508
Vercingetorix
··Spam RiskIt’s a Rolex?
- Posts
- 963
- Likes
- 1,251
sleepyastronaut
·Hour markers?
I thought the hour markers looked unusual, too, but there's more than one 6305 for sale on chrono24 with these constellation-looking indices.
- Posts
- 4,894
- Likes
- 68,854
CPRwatch
·It’s not on my wrist
Similar threads
- Posts
- 4
- Views
- 395
- Posts
- 39
- Views
- 4K
- Posts
- 6
- Views
- 2K
- Posts
- 8
- Views
- 2K
- Posts
- 21
- Views
- 3K
